opensmtpd tempfails every mail (even local)

2014-04-07 Thread Gregory Edigarov
Helio, configs are just reduced to the famous listen on lo0 table aliases db:/etc/mail/aliases.db table secret db:/etc/mail/secret.db accept for local alias deliver to mbox accept for any relay aliases rebuilt ok, # smtpd -d debug: init ssl-tree info: OpenSMTPD

Re: Install 5.4 onto netbook... almost

2014-04-07 Thread Maurice McCarthy
Another possible solution is to make a default 5.4 install to a raw qemu image in OSX or FreeBSD and dd that to a usb stick. Regards Moss

Re: opensmtpd tempfails every mail (even local)

2014-04-07 Thread Gilles Chehade
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 12:13:06PM +0300, Gregory Edigarov wrote: > Helio, > > configs are just reduced to the famous > > [...] > > system is current as of Sat Apr 5 19:05:54 EEST 2014 > Hi, Did you follow the steps at: http://www.openbsd.org/faq/current.html#20140313 -- Gilles Cheh

Re: opensmtpd tempfails every mail (even local)

2014-04-07 Thread Gregory Edigarov
On 04/07/2014 12:57 PM, Gilles Chehade wrote: On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 12:13:06PM +0300, Gregory Edigarov wrote: Helio, configs are just reduced to the famous [...] system is current as of Sat Apr 5 19:05:54 EEST 2014 Hi, Did you follow the steps at: http://www.openbsd.org/faq/curre

Re: claws-mail

2014-04-07 Thread Stefan Wollny
Am 04/07/14 00:15, schrieb Stuart Henderson: On 2014-04-06, Stefan Wollny wrote: (1) I waited - but claws-mail is still not in the set of packages though everything got update by April 5th. Webkit was still broken on i386 for that build run. The next build run will have it working. (2) I

Re: Install 5.4 onto netbook... almost

2014-04-07 Thread Brett Mahar
On Mon, 7 Apr 2014 10:35:31 +0100 Maurice McCarthy wrote: | Another possible solution is to make a default 5.4 install to a raw qemu image in OSX or FreeBSD and dd that to a usb stick. | | Regards | Moss | Maybe I missed some of the posts but instead of all these crazy convoluted methods, ju

Re: Install 5.4 onto netbook... almost

2014-04-07 Thread Tomas Bodzar
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Brett Mahar wrote: > On Mon, 7 Apr 2014 10:35:31 +0100 > Maurice McCarthy wrote: > > | Another possible solution is to make a default 5.4 install to a raw qemu > image in OSX or FreeBSD and dd that to a usb stick. > | > | Regards > | Moss > | > > Maybe I missed so

Re: Install 5.4 onto netbook... almost

2014-04-07 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2014/04/07 13:08, Norman Gray wrote: > > Stuart, hello. > > On 2014 Apr 6, at 23:39, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > ale(4) and the USB drivers are not on the single-floppy installer > > that you're using, hence the lack of network and flash devices. > > Ah, well that explains _that_ little p

Re: Only two holes in a heck of a long time, but why?

2014-04-07 Thread Chris Bennett
On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 03:38:17PM -0700, Chris Cappuccio wrote: > Chris Bennett [chrisbenn...@bennettconstruction.us] wrote: > > > > X is also built in. > > Gee, base is so insecure!! > > > > X is a security disaster > Most of the internet sites I use work just fine with lynx. vi works ok. I

Re: Install 5.4 onto netbook... almost

2014-04-07 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2014-04-07, Brett Mahar wrote: > On Mon, 7 Apr 2014 10:35:31 +0100 > Maurice McCarthy wrote: > >| Another possible solution is to make a default 5.4 install to a raw qemu >image in OSX or FreeBSD and dd that to a usb stick. >| >| Regards >| Moss >| > > Maybe I missed some of the posts but i

Re: Install 5.4 onto netbook... almost

2014-04-07 Thread Norman Gray
Stuart, hello. On 2014 Apr 6, at 23:39, Stuart Henderson wrote: > ale(4) and the USB drivers are not on the single-floppy installer > that you're using, hence the lack of network and flash devices. Ah, well that explains _that_ little problem, and neatly closes off a fruitless avenue. > Oh -

Re: Install 5.4 onto netbook... almost

2014-04-07 Thread Norman Gray
Brett, hello. On 2014 Apr 7, at 12:36, Brett Mahar wrote: > Maybe I missed some of the posts but instead of all these crazy convoluted > methods, just install to a usb drive on a regular computer (ie one with a cd > rom) then boot ramdisk (bsd.rd) on your netbook, explanations at: > > http://

Re: Install 5.4 onto netbook... almost

2014-04-07 Thread Martin Brandenburg
Norman Gray wrote: > Stuart, hello. > > On 2014 Apr 6, at 23:39, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > ale(4) and the USB drivers are not on the single-floppy installer > > that you're using, hence the lack of network and flash devices. > > Ah, well that explains _that_ little problem, and neatly clo

is -current broken?

2014-04-07 Thread soko.tica
Hello. I've upgraded -current (i386, dated april 6th, 2014), and a few things (e.g. pkg_mgr and libreoffice4.1) won't start. Is it intentionally broken, or the packages are just out of sync? Thanks in advance for your answer.

Re: is -current broken?

2014-04-07 Thread Miod Vallat
> I've upgraded -current (i386, dated april 6th, 2014), and a few things > (e.g. pkg_mgr and libreoffice4.1) won't start. > > Is it intentionally broken, or the packages are just out of sync? You did not say what state you were upgrading from. Your question can't be answered without this informat

kernel panic assistance

2014-04-07 Thread sangdrax8
I have had a kernel panic that took down my system, and I was wondering if someone can provide some insight into where I can begin with this. I had to reboot the machine to get it back up, but I did run a trace and grabbed the output from dmesg before I rebooted. If this isn't enough information,

Re: is -current broken?

2014-04-07 Thread soko.tica
I've upgraded from a previous -current, also tagged 5.5, a month or two old. But it seems it's not broken, pkg_mgr works, it just had to have the database initialized. Regarding libreoffice, I've also pkg_deleted 4.1.3.2p3v0 and pkg_add 4.1.5.3v0 and it started. I can't remember if I started runn

Re: is -current broken?

2014-04-07 Thread Philip Guenther
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 9:52 AM, soko.tica wrote: > But it seems it's not broken, pkg_mgr works, it just had to have the > database initialized. Regarding libreoffice, I've also pkg_deleted > 4.1.3.2p3v0 and pkg_add 4.1.5.3v0 and it started. "pkg_add -u", to bring all your packages up to date, is

Re: is -current broken?

2014-04-07 Thread soko.tica
Of course I run sysmerge :) pkg_add -u (immediately after sysmerge) didn't do the trick this time for this particular package (libreoffice), but pkg_delete and pkg_add thereafter did. BTW, I saw some new groups added after the upgrade: _smtpq, _nds and _unbound. Is it wrong if i say AWESOME (I'm

Re: is -current broken?

2014-04-07 Thread Josh Grosse
On 2014-04-07 13:30, soko.tica wrote: BTW, I saw some new groups added after the upgrade: _smtpq, _nds and _unbound. Is it wrong if i say AWESOME (I'm almost 50)? It's great that you noticed, however these were already described in http://www.openbsd.org/faq/current.html -- this is a document

Re: is -current broken?

2014-04-07 Thread soko.tica
I do apologize for continuing offtopic. Although jggimi is right, and one should have read first, I'm simply used to -current working FLAWLESSLY on my home desktop, as well as -stable on my small home network. :) On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 7:35 PM, Josh Grosse wrote: > On 2014-04-07 13:30, soko.t

PF rule for transparent siproxd ?

2014-04-07 Thread Christophe
Hi list, I encounter a problem while aptempting to get siproxd acting as a transparent SIP proxy and PF. OpenBSD version is 5.4 on amd64. > OpenBSD 5.4 (GENERIC) #37: Tue Jul 30 15:24:05 MDT 2013 > dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC siproxd installed from pack

Re: PF rule for transparent siproxd ?

2014-04-07 Thread Simon Perreault
I don't know the direct answer to your question, but taking a step back... Any reason you want a transparent SIP proxy rather than an explicitly-configured SIP B2BUA? The latter is usually much easier to set up and maintain. Simon -- DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viageni

Re: Only two holes in a heck of a long time, but why?

2014-04-07 Thread Kevin Chadwick
previously on this list Stuart Henderson contributed: > > If a port is considered dangerous like wireshark was it > > is removed to avoid encouraging it but users can still build it of > > course. > > There's a problem with *not* having it in ports too, if people do compile > it

Re: Only two holes in a heck of a long time, but why?

2014-04-07 Thread Kevin Chadwick
previously on this list Riccardo Mottola contributed: > Yes, sysmerge is really neat. Perhaps I should expand as to why if it has been so long without him using. sysmerge handles everything in /etc! via etc??.tgz and xetc??.tgz and lets you do quick diffs (which I shamelessly copied from for my

Re: Install 5.4 onto netbook... almost

2014-04-07 Thread Brett Mahar
On Mon, 7 Apr 2014 13:08:08 +0100 Norman Gray wrote: | Brett, hello. | | On 2014 Apr 7, at 12:36, Brett Mahar wrote: | | > Maybe I missed some of the posts but instead of all these crazy convoluted methods, just install to a usb drive on a regular computer (ie one with a cd rom) then boot ra

Re: SHA256.sig missing from install55.iso

2014-04-07 Thread Bill Hacker
Kevin Chadwick yahoo.co.uk> writes: > > previously on this list frantisek holop contributed: > > > the lack of the same file is stopping sysmerge > > from working. > > I'm sure you know but just in case, -S skips the check which you can do > manually as Theo mentioned. > Also - unless I am h

Re: kernel panic assistance

2014-04-07 Thread Philip Guenther
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 9:49 AM, sangdrax8 wrote: > I have had a kernel panic that took down my system, and I was wondering if > someone > can provide some insight into where I can begin with this. I had to reboot > the machine > to get it back up, but I did run a trace and grabbed the output fr

Re: Only two holes in a heck of a long time, but why?

2014-04-07 Thread Alexander Hall
On August 27, 2014 10:16:21 PM CEST, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > ... Kevin, FYI, your time is horribly off...

Re: Install 5.4 onto netbook... almost

2014-04-07 Thread Jan Stary
On Apr 08 09:24:09, br...@coiloptic.org wrote: > | > http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq14.html#flashmemLive > | > | That route would indeed work (I quoted both of those links in my original > | email), but both require a pre-existing OpenBSD installation in order > | to create the bootable full instal

Re: New hardware for BGPd

2014-04-07 Thread Rod Whitworth
On Thu, 3 Apr 2014 12:21:59 + (UTC), Stuart Henderson wrote: >I should be getting a supermicro A1SAi-2550F box from a system builder to >test in a week or so, which covers most of this while using less power. >4 ports onboard and a PCIe slot so you could add a quad nic (though for >my intended

Re: New hardware for BGPd

2014-04-07 Thread Rod Whitworth
On Thu, 3 Apr 2014 18:51:58 + (UTC), Doros Eracledes wrote: >We had very good results with SuperMicro machines with the X9SCi-LN4 >motherboard. It comes with 4 x Integrated Intel 82574 L Gigabit LAN Ports so >with an additional Intel Quad card we get 8 ports in total. >the CPU we get is the