On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 5:32 AM, Patrick Lamaiziere
wrote:
> Le Mon, 20 Jan 2014 18:59:02 -0200,
> Eduardo Meyer a écrit :
>
> > hello,
> >
> > I am doing some basic testings on the above mentioned scenario and I
> > am stuck on some limits which I consider to be very low: I cannot get
> > more t
Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
> > How can i find out this numbers? From power block sticker?
>
> I use a (good) power meter. Don't buy the cheapest one.
>From time to time, c't magazine reviews the cheap wattmeters available
on the German (~ European) market. Their latest test, in the
I am running obsd 5.4 as my NAT router. I decided to setup a second obsd
box and run carp between the two for the external NATed interface (facing
the ISP). After I setup everything and switched pf to NAT using the address
on the carp interface, I'm seeing about 12Mbps - 13Mbps on the download, I
h
I have two Firewalls running OBSD 5.4 x64 that are both live and working
fine except that they are unable to ping each others IP address or the
gateway address while PF is enabled. If I quickly disable PF on the
FW-D=Backup then I am able to ping everything from that machine. I've
gone over eve
keith wrote:
I have two Firewalls running OBSD 5.4 x64 that are both live and working
fine except that they are unable to ping each others IP address or the
gateway address while PF is enabled. If I quickly disable PF on the
FW-D=Backup then I am able to ping everything from that machine. I've
go
Ted,
Thank you so much for responding. I understand all of the words you
used. However, this definitely goes beyond what I have done yet. I will need
for the apache server to instigate the request. I imagine I would want a vast
majority of the scripting to be run via CGI as normal c
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 07:31:14PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
>
> > > How can i find out this numbers? From power block sticker?
> >
> > I use a (good) power meter. Don't buy the cheapest one.
>
> From time to time, c't magazine reviews the cheap
Also, in case it might help, here's the dmesg output and appropriate
hostname.* files from the primary (master):
dmesg:
OpenBSD 5.4 (GENERIC.MP) #41: Tue Jul 30 15:30:02 MDT 2013
dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
real mem = 2119761920 (2021MB)
avail mem = 20
On 2014-01-15, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2014-01-14, Richard Procter wrote:
>>
>> I've a question about the new checksum changes. [...]
>> My understanding is that checksums are now always recalculated when
>> a header is altered, never updated.
>>
>> Is that right and if so has this affect
* Richard Procter [2014-01-22 06:44]:
> > That is exactly what slides 30-33 talk about. PF now checks
> > the incoming packets before it rewrites the checksum, so it can
> > reject them if they are broken.
> Right -- so NAT now replaces the existing transport checksum
> with one newly computed fro
Hi all,
I'm using pf as my firewall and authpf as my authenticating gateway.I think
it works well. But I have two problem about it:
1. I want to limit per ip(user) bandwidth using ALTQ. I google it and
haven't found any command or conf in pf.conf which can do it. My solution
is create queue per i
You PF rules are needed too for this.
On 22 jan 2014, at 00:51, Gabriel Kuri wrote:
> I am running obsd 5.4 as my NAT router. I decided to setup a second obsd
> box and run carp between the two for the external NATed interface (facing
> the ISP). After I setup everything and switched pf to NAT u
12 matches
Mail list logo
