Re: Western Digital - Advanced Format

2013-06-01 Thread Kenneth R Westerback
On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 07:38:50AM +0100, MD wrote: > Recently obtained WD7500-BPKT (750g) hard drive that apparently > possesses Advanced Format technology. > On Intel D525MW board through ACPI. > > On installation of 5.3-release, offered FFS (not FFS2) - ok ;-) > > First partition auto-aligned

Re: Western Digital - Advanced Format

2013-06-01 Thread MD
On 01/06/13 12:56, Kenneth R Westerback wrote: On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 07:38:50AM +0100, MD wrote: Recently obtained WD7500-BPKT (750g) hard drive that apparently Will Advanced Format Just Work(TM)? You do not show the dmesg so it's impossible to tell what the kernel thinks the drive is c

Re: OSPF ABR/ASBR issue

2013-06-01 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 02:30:09PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote: > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:51:24PM +0200, Stijn wrote: > > Hi misc, > > > > I've been playing with OSPF on OpenBSD and Cisco and there's > > something I can't get my head around. I hope someone is able to > > point my in the right di

005_in6.patch

2013-06-01 Thread J. Scott Heppler
The latest patch for 5.3 has incomplete instructions "/usr/src" has previously been "cd /usr/src" and the patch did not find the file on my i386 install. -- J. Scott Heppler

ral(4) or ath(4)

2013-06-01 Thread Lars Nooden
Are there any big reasons not to choose ral(4) over ath(4) for a host ap? I've been trying out three wireless cards on -current as host access points. So far it seems that ral(4) works better, but is quite weak on the overall range in mode 11g as compared to 11a. One message earlier on misc

Re: softdep flag lost when updating mountpoint

2013-06-01 Thread Patrik Lundin
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 06:45:18AM +0200, Patrik Lundin wrote: > > I am currently testing this patch, I will report back once I have > some results. > So have have tried to stress test the patch, and while it seems to superficially work it doesnt really seem stable. I have written a rather silly

I can't find what is wrong with these PF rules

2013-06-01 Thread John Tate
I am trying to set up a simple nat on OpenBSD 5.3, I copied from another config that is working. ext_if="em0" int_if="em1" ipv6="2607:f2f8:aa18::2" ipv4="208.79.92.130" local_net="192.168.1.0/24" cyrus="192.168.1.2" cyrus_ports = "{ 2022 }" tcp_serv = "{ ftp, ssh, http, https, 1, , 808

Re: I can't find what is wrong with these PF rules

2013-06-01 Thread John Tate
I forgot to sysctl net.inet.ip.forwarding=1 lol. On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 8:36 AM, John Tate wrote: > I am trying to set up a simple nat on OpenBSD 5.3, I copied from another > config that is working. > > ext_if="em0" > int_if="em1" > ipv6="2607:f2f8:aa18::2" > ipv4="208.79.92.130" > > local_net=