Re: OpenBSD 5.3 npppd pppoe segmantation fault

2013-04-20 Thread YASUOKA Masahiko
Hi, On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 01:00:14 +0900 trick star wrote: > hi, I have problem in the OpenBSD -snapshots 5.3 npppd pppoe setting! > server's npppd was down for segmantation fault. when client to attache > the server. > before -current version was fine. but new -snapshots is suck. > if anyone could

Why does OpenBSD use CVS?

2013-04-20 Thread Alokat MacMoneysack
Hi, first, I don't want to start a flame war about why is CVS better or not better than X - it's just a question. If you say, we use it because it just works - it's okay. :) So why does OpenBSD still uses CVS and don't migrate to SVN or something like git as other OSS projekts do? Regards, fr

Re: Why does OpenBSD use CVS?

2013-04-20 Thread James Griffin
Sat 20.Apr'13 at 9:43:24 +0200, Alokat MacMoneysack > Hi, > > first, I don't want to start a flame war about why is CVS better or not > better than X - it's just a question. > > If you say, we use it because it just works - it's okay. :) > > So why does OpenBSD

Re: Why does OpenBSD use CVS?

2013-04-20 Thread Alokat MacMoneysack
I find it a little bit difficult to see the commits from the developers. Because I have to check out the single files and not a single commit. James Griffin wrote: >Sat 20.Apr'13 at 9:43:24 +0200, Alokat >MacMoneysack >> Hi, >> >> first, I don't want to start a

Re: Why does OpenBSD use CVS?

2013-04-20 Thread NU-g.lister
I work in a place where we used CVS. Recently due to various issues (commits per file, pserver too slow, branching) we switched to Git. Now after some months with Git there are some people, me as well but to lesser extent (I had an early start), who are having issues due to branches they want to

Re: Why does OpenBSD use CVS?

2013-04-20 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Alokat MacMoneysack wrote: > I find it a little bit difficult to see the commits from the developers. > Because I have to check out the single files and not a single commit. You might find the cvsps package useful. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de

Re: Why does OpenBSD use CVS?

2013-04-20 Thread Franco Fichtner
On Apr 20, 2013, at 1:02 PM, na...@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) wrote: > Alokat MacMoneysack wrote: > >> I find it a little bit difficult to see the commits from the developers. >> Because I have to check out the single files and not a single commit. > > You might find the cvsps package

Re: Disappointing ISC BIND performance on OpenBSD 5.3 snapshot

2013-04-20 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2013-04-19, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote: > root@dmeg-dns1 ~ # /usr/local/sbin/named -V > BIND 9.9.2-P2 built with > '--enable-shared' '--enable-threads' You could try rebuilding the port without --enable-threads and see if i

NAT with one interface

2013-04-20 Thread fekete
According to the pf FAQ page for network address translation: "An OpenBSD system doing NAT will have at least two network adapters, one to the Internet, the other to your internal network." I have a VPS with two IP addresses, one for the Internet and one for a VLAN. I have another VPS just on the

Re: Why does OpenBSD use CVS?

2013-04-20 Thread Lana Black
On 09:43 Sat 20 Apr , Alokat MacMoneysack wrote: > Hi, > > first, I don't want to start a flame war about why is CVS better or not > better than X - it's just a question. > > If you say, we use it because it just works - it's okay. :) > > So why does OpenBSD still uses CVS and don't migrate

Re: USB Wireless Adapter with hostap

2013-04-20 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2013-04-18, Vijay Sankar wrote: > I am trying to replace an Apple Extreme base station with an OpenBSD > router and tried quite a few Linksys/Cisco, D-Link etc., wireless USB > adapters but none of them seem to support hostap mode. Everything I > tried uses run, urtw, or urtwn and the sto

Re: Why does OpenBSD use CVS?

2013-04-20 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2013-04-20, Alokat MacMoneysack wrote: > Hi, > > first, I don't want to start a flame war about why is CVS better or not > better than X - it's just a question. > > If you say, we use it because it just works - it's okay. :) > > So why does OpenBSD still uses CVS and don't migrate to SVN or so

Re: Why does OpenBSD use CVS?

2013-04-20 Thread Kenneth R Westerback
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 01:06:44PM +0200, Franco Fichtner wrote: > On Apr 20, 2013, at 1:02 PM, na...@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) wrote: > > > Alokat MacMoneysack wrote: > > > >> I find it a little bit difficult to see the commits from the developers. > >> Because I have to check out the

Re: NAT with one interface

2013-04-20 Thread Nikola Gyurov
You can. Best regards, Nikola Gyurov On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 3:58 PM, wrote: > According to the pf FAQ page for network address translation: "An OpenBSD > system doing NAT will have at least two network adapters, one to the > Internet, the other to your internal network." > > I have a VPS with

Re: NAT with one interface

2013-04-20 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2013-04-20, fek...@tormail.org wrote: > According to the pf FAQ page for network address translation: "An OpenBSD > system doing NAT will have at least two network adapters, one to the > Internet, the other to your internal network." > > I have a VPS with two IP addresses, one for the Internet

Re: NAT with one interface

2013-04-20 Thread Ted Unangst
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 00:47, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > I've changed the FAQ to say "interfaces" rather than "adapters" to > make it more obvious that there's no problem doing this with vlans. Strictly speaking, you don't even need vlans. You can NAT off a single interface with two IPs.

Re: Why does OpenBSD use CVS?

2013-04-20 Thread Nick Holland
On 04/20/13 03:42, Alokat MacMoneysack wrote: > Hi, > > first, I don't want to start a flame war about why is CVS better or > not better than X - it's just a question. > > If you say, we use it because it just works - it's okay. :) Good, 'cause it does. :) > So why does OpenBSD still uses CVS a