On Jan 3, 2013, at 11:08 AM, Gene wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 1:31 AM, Bruno Flückiger wrote:
>>
>> My personal favorites are the boxes from this small company in Switzerland:
>>
>> http://www.pcengines.ch
>>
>> Regards,
>> Bruno
>>
>
> The ALIX hardware is incredible. I own two of the
Sean Kamath skrev 2013-01-04 09:07:
> I second the ALIX board being worthy. I don't have as many as Mr
> Shupe, but I have more than a few. Huh. That seems like a deal for one
> of the Netgate versions, but pcengines.ch has the 2d13 board for
> US$104, case for ~US$9 (but no US Power Adapter. :-().
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 08:44:33AM +0100, Random, Eyes wrote:
> I installed an OpenBSD 5.2 using "-* & +etc* & +base* & +bsd".
>
> Can someone tell my why are these:
>
> [...]
>
> important in the default install to be enabled? With this the KISS
> principle is not followed...
>
Interesting que
obviously you or someone from this list knows the answer that why are
these rarely used services needed to be enabled by default.
p.s.: are you Gilles ( http://unix.stackexchange.com/users/885/gilles )?
2013/1/4 Gilles Chehade :
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 08:44:33AM +0100, Random, Eyes wrote:
>> I
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 10:37:13AM +0100, Random, Eyes wrote:
> obviously you or someone from this list knows the answer that why are
> these rarely used services needed to be enabled by default.
>
I don't, as a matter of fact I don't rely on inetd so it's disabled on
my machines.
> p.s.: are y
El Fri, 4 Jan 2013 08:08:24 +0100
Tomas Bodzar escribió:
> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Andriy Samsonyuk
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 06:40:39PM +0100, Jes wrote:
> >> And probably no power on usb ports after resume, like my T410.
> > have not checked yet
> >
> > Do i understand it co
- Original message -
> El Fri, 4 Jan 2013 08:08:24 +0100
> Tomas Bodzar escribió:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Andriy Samsonyuk
> > wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 06:40:39PM +0100, Jes wrote:
> > > > And probably no power on usb ports after resume, like my T410.
> > > have
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 12:09:10PM +0100, Lo?c Blot wrote:
> Hello,
> since OpenBSD 5.2 i have a problem with NMAP:
>
> Starting Nmap 6.01 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2013-01-04 11:47 CET
> route_dst_generic: Failed to obtain system routes: getsysroutes_dnet:
> sysroutes_dnet_find_interfaces() failed
>
Hello,
since OpenBSD 5.2 i have a problem with NMAP:
Starting Nmap 6.01 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2013-01-04 11:47 CET
route_dst_generic: Failed to obtain system routes: getsysroutes_dnet:
sysroutes_dnet_find_interfaces() failed
If i disable PF the problem isn't present.
Do you have an idea ?
Tha
IMHO OpenBSD is pretty usable in a laptop, old or modern. Most of things
run in the right way. From my point of view only a few things are
missing now:
[...]
- no NTFS support
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=mount_ntfs&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=OpenBSD+Current&arch=i386&form
Hello,
It's a simple nmap :
Nmap -p 1688 a.b.c.d -PN
Loic Blot
Le 4 janv. 2013 à 12:14, "Peter N. M. Hansteen" a écrit :
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 12:09:10PM +0100, Lo?c Blot wrote:
>> Hello,
>> since OpenBSD 5.2 i have a problem with NMAP:
>>
>> Starting Nmap 6.01 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2013
Should this question posted on the dev mailing list?
2013/1/4 Gilles Chehade :
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 10:37:13AM +0100, Random, Eyes wrote:
>> obviously you or someone from this list knows the answer that why are
>> these rarely used services needed to be enabled by default.
>>
>
> I don't, as
Hmmm strange but with
--
Best regards,
Loïc BLOT, Engineering
UNIX Systems, Security and Networks
http://www.unix-experience.fr
Le vendredi 04 janvier 2013 à 13:04 +0100, Loïc BLOT a écrit :
> Hello,
> It's a simple nmap :
> Nmap -p 1688 a.b.c.d -PN
>
> Loic Blot
>
> Le 4 janv. 2013
Strange but with
nmap -sT -p -PN it works.
--
Best regards,
Loïc BLOT, Engineering
UNIX Systems, Security and Networks
http://www.unix-experience.fr
Le vendredi 04 janvier 2013 à 13:04 +0100, Loïc BLOT a écrit :
> Hello,
> It's a simple nmap :
> Nmap -p 1688 a.b.c.d -PN
>
> Loic B
On vendredi 04 janvier 2013 à 01:23:56, Random, Eyes wrote:
> Should this question posted on the dev mailing list?
I don't think so. What are you trying to do? Broadcasting
line noise?
wrt to your question: the fact that you have no use for these
services doesn't mean they aren't useful to deve
I've sent tenda dongle back. 'Ordered d-link
dwa-140, which is on the run man page.
Thanks all, who helped to solve the puzzle.
When the device comes, I will report how it
works (or not).
Best regards
Zoran
El Fri, 04 Jan 2013 23:03:48 +1100
Brett Mahar escribió:
>
> > IMHO OpenBSD is pretty usable in a laptop, old or modern. Most of
> > things run in the right way. From my point of view only a few
> > things are missing now:
> >
>
> [...]
>
> > - no NTFS support
>
>
> http://www.openbsd.org/cg
Hi,
There are a lot of pci "unknown product" messages in the dmesg for my
VE900 mainboard with the VIA VX900 chipset. I don't see anything
appearing in pcidevs in CVS for it yet. I have tracked down a datasheet
for it at the VIA web site here:
http://linux.via.com.tw/support/downloadFiles.ac
Users normally send diffs with applied ID's to tech@.
Else you can wait until someone else does this for you.
You might want to send your dmesg to dmesg(at)openbsd.org, then "someone else"
will take a look at it. :)
Regards,
Maxim
On 4 jan 2013, at 19:01, Mike Williams wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There
I wonder if browsers will tighten permissions and stop accepting sub CA certs
from those CAs listed on their spreadsheet as not having any subs..
Landry Breuil wrote:
>On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 01:41:27AM -0700, Landry Breuil wrote:
>> CVSROOT: /cvs
>> Module name: ports
>> Changes by: lan.
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 01:41:27AM -0700, Landry Breuil wrote:
> CVSROOT: /cvs
> Module name: ports
> Changes by: lan...@cvs.openbsd.org 2012/12/31 01:41:27
>
> Modified files:
> security/nss : Makefile distinfo
>
> Log message:
> Update to nss-3.14.1.with.ckbi.1.93, which expli
You have all failed to mention that the ALIX devices come with Swiss
chocolates in the package!
Best regards,
Dan
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 7:36 AM, James Shupe wrote:
> On 1/3/2013 8:26 PM, Aaron Mason wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 11:52 AM, James Shupe wrote:
>>> On 1/3/2013 1:08 PM, Gene wro
I just tried to use the latest amd64 snapshot to prepare for an upgrade to our
firewall. We use DHCP during initial installation to PXE boot and perform the
install at which point we configure through site52.tgz. However, during
installation and after boot DHCP reports the following error
C
On 1/4/2013 2:58 PM, Dan Shechter wrote:
> You have all failed to mention that the ALIX devices come with Swiss
> chocolates in the package!
> Best regards,
> Dan
>
Ours didn't! I was unaware of that! NETGATE?!!
--
James Shupe
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature
I have never tried trunk on OBSD, and maybe I am miss reading the
manual, but even with failover mode you should be careful from having
a link connected to a switch which it's uplinks are disconnected from
the core.
Broadcom and Intel usually provide NIC teaming drivers for
Linux/Windows which pro
On Jan 04 12:05:53, jpelt...@sfu.ca wrote:
> I just tried to use the latest amd64 snapshot to prepare for an upgrade to
> our firewall. We use DHCP during initial installation to PXE boot and
> perform the install at which point we configure through site52.tgz. However,
> during installation a
- Original Message -
| On Jan 04 12:05:53, jpelt...@sfu.ca wrote:
| > I just tried to use the latest amd64 snapshot to prepare for an
| > upgrade to our firewall. We use DHCP during initial installation
| > to PXE boot and perform the install at which point we configure
| > through site52.
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 02:10:02PM -0800, James A. Peltier wrote:
> - Original Message -
> | On Jan 04 12:05:53, jpelt...@sfu.ca wrote:
> | > I just tried to use the latest amd64 snapshot to prepare for an
> | > upgrade to our firewall. We use DHCP during initial installation
> | > to PXE
On 03/01/2013 01:34, Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
I've started bringing in the changes made in that directory to a copy of
the OpenBSD driver hosted here https://bitbucket.org/sevan/edp
I took merged all the changes to the .c & .h files from the github rep
then recompiled & installed a new driver.
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 02:53:55AM +0400, Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
> On 03/01/2013 01:34, Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
> >I've started bringing in the changes made in that directory to a copy of
> >the OpenBSD driver hosted here https://bitbucket.org/sevan/edp
>
> I took merged all the changes to the
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 03:04:32PM -0600, James Shupe wrote:
> On 1/4/2013 2:58 PM, Dan Shechter wrote:
> > You have all failed to mention that the ALIX devices come with Swiss
> > chocolates in the package!
> > Best regards,
> > Dan
> >
>
> Ours didn't! I was unaware of that! NETGATE?!!
You shou
- Original Message -
| On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 02:10:02PM -0800, James A. Peltier wrote:
| > - Original Message -
| > | On Jan 04 12:05:53, jpelt...@sfu.ca wrote:
| > | > I just tried to use the latest amd64 snapshot to prepare for an
| > | > upgrade to our firewall. We use DHCP du
Hi folks!
I have a windows desktop and would like to install a virtualization
software in order to have two virtual machine. I pretend to install OpenBSD
on both of them.
Which virtualization solution would be the best one for OpenBSD to run on ?
Thanks.
On 01/03/13 16:11, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2013-01-03, Friedrich Locke wrote:
Hi folks!
What happens if i have a trunk(loadbalance) interface setted for 2 physical
interfaces and connect each physical one on different switches?
Tnx
From the manual;
"The trunk protocols loadbala
On 1/4/2013 3:42 PM, Friedrich Locke wrote:
Hi folks!
I have a windows desktop and would like to install a virtualization
software in order to have two virtual machine. I pretend to install OpenBSD
on both of them.
Which virtualization solution would be the best one for OpenBSD to run on ?
Tha
Hi,
I think the best solutions is to test by yourself thoses solutions ;) ( I'm
kidding)
For me the solution can be virtualbox :
A single googlesearch let me known this link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qyFWeSynOjc
Best Regards
Olivier Calzi
2013/1/5 Friedrich Locke
> Hi folks!
>
> I have
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Dan Shechter wrote:
> You have all failed to mention that the ALIX devices come with Swiss
> chocolates in the package!
> Best regards,
> Dan
>
>
I've ordered direct from PCEngines before and never got that.
> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 7:36 AM, James Shupe wrote:
>>
hi,
i seem to recall reading in some RFC or maybe in
one of the stevens books that these services are
required for a "server". i look at it as being
a good internet neighbour, a bit like "can you tell
me the time please" when someone stops you on the street...
-f
--
and god said, "i'll buy a vo
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Aaron Mason wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Dan Shechter wrote:
>> You have all failed to mention that the ALIX devices come with Swiss
>> chocolates in the package!
>>
>
> I've ordered direct from PCEngines before and never got that.
Perhaps you should a
Hi,
Virtualbox is the best from my experience.Just make sure your processor
have VT enable for virtualization. Some old proc can't do virtualization
On 5 Jan 2013 07:44, "Friedrich Locke" wrote:
On Jan 4, 2013, at 5:10 PM, Johan Beisser wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Aaron Mason wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Dan Shechter wrote:
>>> You have all failed to mention that the ALIX devices come with Swiss
>>> chocolates in the package!
>>>
>>
>> I've ordered direct fr
41 matches
Mail list logo
