On Nov 29, 2012, at 11:35 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>> Because they can just hack it on top of their crusty old ftp server
>> software, whereas using sftp would need much bigger changes?
>
> SSL/TLS makes everything more secure
And DPI-based products are slow to fix their issues caused by th
On 30.11.2012 06:29, zgeggy2k wrote:
> Yes, I tried stacking them one after the other (first raiding, then
> crypto'ing) - didn't work.
Try that :
wd0a & wd1a are RAID partitions.
bioctl -c 1 -l wd0a,wd1a softraid0
Create a RAID partition on the new raid device sd0.
bioctl -c C -r 8192 -l /dev/
On 2012-11-29, Chris Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Chris Smith
> wrote:
>> Looks like skipping ftp-proxy for that target address works. Thanks!
>
> Is there any way to make this work automagically for ftps?
> Right now I'm doing this:
>
> anchor "ft
* Friedrich Locke [2012-11-13 00:05]:
> i am planning to write a simple web server. My initial ideia for this
> server is that it will only serve static content.
> So, i would like to have the best possible performance.
you are reinevnting the wheel, to put it nicely.
> I don't feel like going f
Jiri B [ji...@devio.us] wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 04:13:47PM -0200, Friedrich Locke wrote:
> >
> > So what would a BSD cloud be different in the context of cloud (not openbsd
> > features) ?
>
> You can of course try to "port" KVM to OpenBSD, hehe.
OpenBSD supports Sun's LDom hypervisor h
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Not exactly, but you might be able to do something with this, *before*
> your ftp-proxy rule:
>
> pass out quick proto tcp to 0.0.0.0/0 port 8821 rdr-to 0.0.0.0/0 port 21
> bitmask
>
> Then if you tell your ftp client to connect to port 8
6 matches
Mail list logo
