On 2012-11-28, Chris Smith wrote:
> Having some issues with a client system attempting to use a product called
> MoveItFreely to connect to server via FTPS (FTP with TLS). The firewall is
> running a snapshot from April, 3 2011 of version 4.9.
>
> I have added a pass rule for the additional (to po
Scenario: I'm using relayd as transparent proxy
and block some sites in work time, so I have two configs:
# cat /etc/relayd.conf
prefork 5
http protocol httpfilter {
tcp { nodelay, sack, socket buffer 65536, backlog 1000 }
return error
request header filter "*youtube.com*"
2012/11/28, Tito Mari Francis Escaño :
> More than just using GCC, since my idea is to also consider LLVM and PCC.
> Thanks for the advise. Looking forward for other options, especially what
> the OpenBSD dev team does to ensure every file complies with the coding
> standard.
LLVM also has -ansi -
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> If the control connection is encrypted as with ftp+tls, then ftp-proxy
> *cannot* work, as it cannot read the commands. So, if this is with NAT,
> you can't rely on ftp-proxy to fix things up, you will need ftp+tls
> software where you can
Dear group,
I was trying to install OBSD 5.2 on a Fujitsu-Siemens PRIMERGY RX200 S2
(dual CPU) and I get following errors:
mpi0: timeout
mpi0: phys disk Async at 0 MHz width 8bit offset 0 QAS 0 DT 0 IU 0
em1 at pci3 dev 6 function 0 "Intel PRO/100MT (82546GB)" rev 0x03: apic
2012/11/28 Tony Berth :
> I aslo saw that the bsd.rd kernel was used during the boot process. Meaning
> that the smp mode is not used?
No. http://openbsd.org/faq/faq4.html#bsd.rd
--
Michał Markowski
On 2012-11-28 14:33, Chris Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Stuart Henderson
> wrote:
>> If the control connection is encrypted as with ftp+tls, then ftp-proxy
>> *cannot* work, as it cannot read the commands. So, if this is with NAT,
>> you can't rely on ftp-proxy to fix things up
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
wrote:
> Since you say this works with a standard home router, have you checked
> if maybe the server software uses nat pmp or something similar for port
> redirection?
I tested it with an Asus RT-AC66U with its UPnP feature disabled and
it wo
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Tony Berth wrote:
> Dear group,
>
> I was trying to install OBSD 5.2 on a Fujitsu-Siemens PRIMERGY RX200 S2
> (dual CPU) and I get following errors:
By any chance ability to try current?
>
>
> mpi0: timeout
> mpi0: phys disk Async at 0 MHz wi
On 2012-11-28, Friedrich Locke wrote:
> Some time ago, if i can remenber, i saw on this list a message about a
> program we install into a box and then it accepts connection from a group
> of hosts and redirects it. The ideia was that if i want to connect to from
> host a to host b, the connection
lilit-aibolit(lilit-aibo...@mail.ru) on 2012.11.28 15:58:42 +0200:
> Scenario: I'm using relayd as transparent proxy
> and block some sites in work time, so I have two configs:
>
> # cat /etc/relayd.conf
> prefork 5
> http protocol httpfilter {
> tcp { nodelay, sack, socket buffer 65536, b
On 28/11/2012, at 11:31, "C. Bensend" wrote:
> Small price to pay, though - ARP is fantastic and I've had nothing
> but good experiences with them.
+1.
Also, a suggestion: if a VPS provider doesn't explicitly offer the OS you want,
ask - even if they don't list the OS at all.
When I setup my V
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 at 14:18:56 -0800, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
> Don't necessarily look at the OpenBSD version numbers that are
> offered, or whether OpenBSD is specifically supported; at least with
> KVM and Xen HVM, it's almost always possible to get console-based
> access and install which
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:47:13AM -0500, Research wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was wondering if anyone had any experience with reputable cloud providers
> that currently offer OpenBSD 5.2.
>
> I was able to find out some information based on the OpenBSD Journal posting
> from Sunday, February 13, 201
Hi,
I'm using 5.2 and trying to use 2 mirrored disks as RAID1, but also encrypt
them.
I can use softraid to either raid1 _OR_ encrypt, but not both.
I've RTFM'd and UTFSE to no avail. I'm not sure it's doable
Did I miss a magic incantation somewhere?
Thanks in advance.
Cheers!
-- Greg
--
V
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/6/2012 4:15 PM, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 10:34:22PM +0200, Laurent CARON wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm hit by a rather nasty OpenBGPd 'bug' causing sessions to
>> flap (basically go down/up/...).
>>
>> One of the prefixes is: 81.
On 11/29/2012 01:04 AM, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
lilit-aibolit(lilit-aibo...@mail.ru) on 2012.11.28 15:58:42 +0200:
Scenario: I'm using relayd as transparent proxy
and block some sites in work time, so I have two configs:
# cat /etc/relayd.conf
prefork 5
http protocol httpfilter {
tcp {
17 matches
Mail list logo
