On 11/13/12 08:57, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 11:09 PM, Walter Neto wrote:
Hello guys,
I have two internet connections, and I want to make load balancing and
failover service, I had read about pf load balancing and multi-path route,
what is the difference between them.
Which
On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 12:19 +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
>
> autocrap is part of the problem, not the solution. Their documentation
> concerning version numbering, and all the fuzz they add around it don't
> help at all. The "old" style (major.minor) is fairly simple to understand
> and to use, actuall
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
An: OpenBSD-misc list ;
Von:Imre Oolberg
Gesendet: Di 13.11.2012 09:05
Betreff:Re: Internet Connection - Load Balancing and Failover
> On 11/13/12 08:57, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 11:09 PM, Walter Neto wrote:
> >> Hell
On 12 Nov 2012, at 21:37 , Robin Björklin wrote:
> Am I bat crap crazy for thinking it could be good to merge the four largest
> BSD variants out there, take the best bits and pieces out of each and create
> a Unified BSD?
You'd end up creating a fifth.
.tsooJ
--
The first testicular guard
Hello,
I don't think that trunk is appropriate for this scenario.
It is use for OSI level 2 (Ethernet) fail over and/or load balancing but won't
be able to load balance traffic between two internet connection, witch involve
TCP/IP load balancing.
Tomas Bodzar a écrit :
>On Mon, Nov 12, 201
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012/11/13 7:14 AM, Mike. wrote:
> If your goal is to please as many people as possible, then
> compromise is the way to go.
>
> If your goal is to produce outstanding software then, well, you're
> gonna have to piss off a few people.
Could not a
Where i wrote listen i really meant accept.
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Friedrich Locke
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> i am planning to write a simple web server. My initial ideia for this
> server is that it will only serve static content.
> So, i would like to have the best possible performance.
>
> - Then came the Unix wars, where AT&T sued BSDI (a commercial variant
> that no longer exists) over perceived copyright infringement. The
> free BSDs weren't really directly involved, but the suit would have
> been just as relevant, and people were worried.
>
> This was the time that Li
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 11:09 PM, Walter Neto wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> I have two internet connections, and I want to make load balancing and
> failover service, I had read about pf load balancing and multi-path route,
> what is the difference between them.
>
> Which is the better to use in my sce
Hi,
Just a question about fbtab(5) and X11.
In the distributed /etc/fbtab (under i386, -current) the file contains:
# $OpenBSD: fbtab.head,v 1.2 1999/05/05 06:56:34 deraadt Exp $
# login(1) reads this file to determine which devices should be chown'd to
# the new user. Format is:
# login-t
I just can't resist the urge to point to this comic strip, which an
other FreeBSD users posted regarding : "hey let's create a FreeBSD
desktop, like Ubuntu did with Unity"
http://xkcd.com/927/
--
--
Joar Jegleim
Homepage: http://cosmicb.no
Linkedin: http://no.linkedin.com/in/j
2012/11/12 Antoine Jacoutot
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 09:40:51PM +0100, Jean-François SIMON wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I am sorry, I can't work out finding gdm or running Gnome with OpenBSD
> 5.2,
> > could someone please send a link or some informations ?
> > I used to have it working before,
No offense Ignatios Souvatzis but your reference to Minix being a 7th BSD
distro is like saying FreeBSD (or any of the other major BSDs) is another
Linux because of its inter-compatibility for certain user-land components
and various shared code. Minix has a minimal amount of NetBSD code and most
o
On 2012-11-13 11:45, Ignatios Souvatzis wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:08:08AM +0100, Joost van de Griek wrote:
On 12 Nov 2012, at 21:37 , Robin Björklin wrote:
Am I bat crap crazy for thinking it could be good to merge the four largest BSD
variants out there, take the best bits and piec
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:08:08AM +0100, Joost van de Griek wrote:
> On 12 Nov 2012, at 21:37 , Robin Björklin wrote:
>
> > Am I bat crap crazy for thinking it could be good to merge the four largest
> > BSD variants out there, take the best bits and pieces out of each and
> > create a Unifie
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 01:04:27PM +0100, Lars Engels wrote:
> MirBSD / MirOS is dead:
>
> http://www.freshbsd.org/search?project=mirbsd
>
> Last commit: 2011-08-29 23:00:00
I'm no Mir* co-worker, so take this with a grain of salt. But on
general principles:
a) I question the date itself - th
Yes, your bat crap crazy :-)
All of these variants inherit from the same unified BSD 4.4 base code as far
as I know. So years ago there were reasons that groups wanted to spilt off
and focus on specific goals. Some of these goals are mutually exclusive.
These BSD variants are not really competing
After some more researching, I found interesting idea for 8 years
old laptop: realtek rtl8191su inside d-link dwa-131 adapter.
http://www.undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20101216231634
My thinkering is that usb adapter uses less power than pcmcia.
The driver is rsu. Laptop is HP nx9020 with 2
On 13 November 2012 07:04, Lars Engels wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:45:11AM +0100, Ignatios Souvatzis wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:08:08AM +0100, Joost van de Griek wrote:
>> > On 12 Nov 2012, at 21:37 , Robin Björklin
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Am I bat crap crazy for thinking it c
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:45 AM, Ignatios Souvatzis
wrote:
> At least a sixth, IIRC. You left out MirBSD from your distribution list.
> Also, you could argue that Minix, with its NetBSD compatibility,
> is a seventh and MacOS-X, with its partially (Free-/Net-)BSD compatible
> userland, an eighth.
On 11/13/12 08:39, Pierre Marchal wrote:
Hello,
I don't think that trunk is appropriate for this scenario.
It is use for OSI level 2 (Ethernet) fail over and/or load balancing but won't
be able to load balance traffic between two internet connection, witch involve
TCP/IP load balancing.
You
The "Unified BSD" idea is as crazy as the decision to split this
discussion on multiple lists. I've quit reading this, but I got the
Nick's insights, nice and touching as always.
Hi,
i remenber when installing (after building it from
/usr/ports/database/opendap) openldap the scripts in patch directory create
user _openldap and the group too.
Now i cannot see any reference to the user/group openldap server process
will run as ?
Isn't it necessary anymore ? I mean, doesn't
I know the basic history of all the BSDs and the reasons for divergence, but
I've always tended to think of them as different focus areas of a single
project. The best ideas tend to get shared around, where applicable, but each
retains its unique focus and niche within the greater whole. We don't n
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:45:11AM +0100, Ignatios Souvatzis wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:08:08AM +0100, Joost van de Griek wrote:
> > On 12 Nov 2012, at 21:37 , Robin Björklin wrote:
> >
> > > Am I bat crap crazy for thinking it could be good to merge the four
> > > largest BSD variants
I'm trying to find the cleanest solution for correct routing of internal LAN
servers to the external IP's of other servers in the same LAN.
I have read the OpenBSD FAQ here
(http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/rdr.html#reflect ) and mostly understand the
problems associated with doing this via some
Hi,
I've read the other replies and there's no need to install any port. Like
mentioned before, just use relayd(8) from base with the "router" option in
relayd.conf(5) in combination with multipath routing (sysctl
net.inet.ip.multipath=1). You can also use pf with "route-to" or "rtable"
as a class
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Robin Björklin
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> First and foremost I'd like to present myself, I'm a young and naive junior
> sys admin that think people should be able to compromise and see the bigger
> picture and the good of the cause.
>
> Now over to the reason for my post.
>
On 2012-11-13, James Chase wrote:
> Also, is there some catch all that could be created with rules like this?
> Currently we are using this on specific services when we want to be able to
> use the fqdn on a local server without adding the internal ip resolution to
> /etc/hosts:
>
> rdr pass on {$
Hi,
Reference:
> From: Johnny Billquist
> Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 13:34:56 +0100
> Message-id: <50a23e70.8010...@update.uu.se>
Johnny Billquist wrote:
> On 2012-11-13 11:45, Ignatios Souvatzis wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:08:08AM +0100, Joost van de Griek wrote:
> >>
On 2012-11-13 18:51, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Hi,
Reference:
From: Johnny Billquist
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 13:34:56 +0100
Message-id: <50a23e70.8010...@update.uu.se>
Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2012-11-13 11:45, Ignatios Souvatzis wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:08:0
** Moved from sparc@ to misc@; reply-to's set **
On 2012/11/13 23:59, Kaya Saman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to migrate the dhcp configuration from within a Cisco
> router to OpenBSD. So far everything has gone really smoothly and
> basic things are working fine.
>
> What I'm currently quite stu
yes, you are young, naïve, and 'bat crazy'/idealistic (never could find
the difference between these two ;) ...
but you are also quite lazy -- had you taken the time to research the
history behind the forks and the current stated goals and objectives of
each of these OS's, you would see why onl
PLATFORM: Yeelong 2F 8089D
OS: OpenBSD 5.2 stable
PROBLEM: Noppoo Mini Choc 84 USB keyboard do not work correctly on my system.
For exampIe, when I type "Enter", but get "5" displayed on
the screen.
When I plug in my Noppoo Mini Choc 84 USB keyboard, the dme
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 6:19 AM, yunplusplus wrote:
> PLATFORM: Yeelong 2F 8089D
> OS: OpenBSD 5.2 stable
> PROBLEM: Noppoo Mini Choc 84 USB keyboard do not work correctly on my
> system.
> For exampIe, when I type "Enter", but get "5" displayed
> on the scre
"James Chase"
If I fully understand your situation a lot of what you do depends on
whether you intend to resolve names and whether you can use subnets.
In my situation I have a number of servers and internal clients on
different subnets with one external public IP address.
pf obviously becomes tr
With today's i386 snapshot (Nov 14th) and the previous (Nov 11th),
the booting bsd goes straight to ddb> prompt saying
panic: no BIOS memory map supplied
This is on a Thinkpad T40.
Is anyone else seeing this?
On Nov 14 08:35:37, h...@stare.cz wrote:
> With today's i386 snapshot (Nov 14th) and the previous (Nov 11th),
> the booting bsd goes straight to ddb> prompt saying
>
> panic: no BIOS memory map supplied
>
> This is on a Thinkpad T40.
> Is anyone else seeing this?
Forgot to add: here is an
Hi,
we have a HP Proliant Server Gen8, where we want to run OpenBSD on it.
The card mentioned has to go into the FlexibleLOM port on the server, therefore
there is not that much choice of a card.
As far as I have seen, this card is not listed in any of the drivers, but I
found that
link here:
ht
39 matches
Mail list logo
