So i tested my config with Thunderbird/Lightning module, authentication
with htpasswd works !
The problem comes from the path (like @sthen said) i give in ical (from
imac).
And the documentation described in
http://radicale.org/user_documentation/#ical was wrong*
(therefore this last one work
If you're that worried about it, buy a CD.
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012, at 08:34 PM, Rowdy OpenBSD wrote:
> > There are significant weaknesses in any process, the majority of which
> > occur between the build infrastructure and source providers which
> > OpenBSD does a very nice job of.
>
> I'm not sure
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 11:34:48PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 10:26, Rowdy OpenBSD wrote:
>
> > OpenBSD's package system already supports package signing, and OpenSSL
> > can sign files, so there is nothing for which to submit a diff. All
> > of the code is there; it's j
Hi,
for which programming languages a binding for OpenBSD's native filesystem is
already available? Support for extended attributes is also needed.
I would be particularly interested in Ada or Lua bindings, but willing to
consider alternatives.
Thanks
Ben
> I already said there are no plans to start signing things. What more
> is there to discuss?
Two things:
1) Why not? I'd like to know the reasons. I've read the FAQ, I've
checked the archives, and I've read all of the messages in this
thread. The best answer seems to be "because we can't be
> but that requires X
That's a non sensical response that has already been answered and you
wonder why you are thought to be a troll. X doesn't need to run and
some files are required for some packages. Lots of packages are
required for some packages, something OpenBSD fights as best it can
and do
Apreciable Ejecutivo:
TIEM de México
Empresa Líder en Capacitación y Actualización de Capital Humano
Pone a su disposición este excelente curso denominado:
Inteligencia Emocional y Manejo del Estrés
10 de Septiembre en la Ciudad de México
¡Últimos Lugares!
Inscríbase 5 días antes de la fecha d
> No more response from me without bright ideas.
I guess the simplist solution would be for a builder with source tree
access to upload just the snapshot SHA256 to the source tree for
secure cvs download by users?
--
___
'Write
On Thu, 6 Sep 2012 08:34:23 +0800
Rowdy OpenBSD wrote:
> If the OpenBSD project signed its packages and distribution sets, we
> could reasonably assume that they were not compromised between being
> signed and our downloading them. Your current processes do not
> provide the same degree of assura
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 4:05 AM, Rowdy OpenBSD wrote:
> But that's inconsistent with OpenBSD's proactive approach to security.
> The OpenBSD project has put more effort into less significant
> security features than this.
This is not inconsistent. It's clearly stated in faq15[1]:
"The packages
Guía de Comprensión de Estados Financieros para Directores No Financieros
SEMINARIO ONLINE EN VIVO este 18 de Septiembre de 2012.
Descubra en este Seminario ONLINE en Vivo cómo comprender desde un punto de
vista ESTRATÉGICO, AMENO Y PRÁCTICO, los diferentes reportes financieros que
usted necesita p
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 11:09, benh...@gmx.us wrote:
> Hi,
>
> for which programming languages a binding for OpenBSD's native filesystem
> is already available? Support for extended attributes is also needed.
> I would be particularly interested in Ada or Lua bindings, but willing to
> consider al
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 18:05, Rowdy OpenBSD wrote:
>> I already said there are no plans to start signing things. What more
>> is there to discuss?
>
> Two things:
>
> 1) Why not? I'd like to know the reasons. I've read the FAQ, I've
> checked the archives, and I've read all of the messages in
Kevin Chadwick writes:
[...]
> Another issue may be that isn't gpg GNU/GPL and can't be in base.
That's only a detail regarding the whole problem, but there is
netpgp[1], for which there is no port yet.
[1] http://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/netpgp
--
Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas
GPG fingerprint: 61
Ted Unangst writes:
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 11:09, benh...@gmx.us wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> for which programming languages a binding for OpenBSD's native filesystem
>> is already available? Support for extended attributes is also needed.
>> I would be particularly interested in Ada or Lua bindings,
Hi,
I'm not aware at the moment who started this thread, but here are some insights:
o OpenBSD is a free project - besides what "free" normaly means, take
that developers don't own a dime to anybody
o The "developers" do something, out of their resources and they are
kind enough ( actually more
Dear Sirs/ madam:
I got your name and address from Internet and knew you are one of the largest
importers in garment ,shoes,handbags. which is within the scope of our business.
Take this opportunity, we introduce my factory, locate in guang zhou，the
garment and shoes city of China , mainly
On 2012-09-06 18:35, Ted Unangst wrote:
There are no extended attributes, so no support is necessary.
I am confused. I was under the impression that extended
attributes were supported in OpenBSD's native filesystems.
In fact, I came across references to them in some online
documentation, for in
On 2012-09-06 18:35, Ted Unangst wrote:
>There are no extended attributes, so no support is necessary.
I am confused. I was under the impression that extended
attributes were supported in OpenBSD's native filesystems.
In fact, I came across references to them in some online
documentation, for
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 09:00:48PM +0200, za...@gmx.com wrote:
> On 2012-09-06 18:35, Ted Unangst wrote:
> >There are no extended attributes, so no support is necessary.
>
> I am confused. I was under the impression that extended
> attributes were supported in OpenBSD's native filesystems.
> In f
za...@gmx.com writes:
> In fact, I came across references to them in some online
> documentation, for instance
> http://nixdoc.net/man-pages/openbsd/man8/extattrctl.8.html
If you go all the way to the end of that page, you see that it's taken
from OpenBSD 3.6
> Are you sure that neither FFS nor
On 2012-09-06 21:14, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 09:00:48PM +0200, za...@gmx.com wrote:
On 2012-09-06 18:35, Ted Unangst wrote:
There are no extended attributes, so no support is necessary.
I am confused. I was under the impression that extended
attributes were supported in O
At 08:38 AM 8/16/2012, Joel Carnat wrote:
Le 15 août 2012 à 16:16, L. V. Lammert a écrit :
This looked interesting so I had a look at it for a few hours.
My (2 cents) conclusions are:
- it has a pretty interface indeed ;
- it has a few configuration bugs (php modules are not enabled and it
expe
On 2012-09-06, johnw wrote:
> Sorry, my english is so bad.
> anyway, i want to say is ... below
>
>> pkg_add does support scp for downloading packages, though there aren't any
>> mirrors that use it. See pkg_add(1):
>
> Yes, why those mirrors do not support scp/sftp (package files)
> transfer? (lo
Cómo Crear Presentaciones Excepcionales en Power Point
SEMINARIO ONLINE EN VIVO este 19 de Septiembre de 2012.
La creación de una presentación en PowerPoint va más allá de utilizar de
manera efectiva el programa, es poder sacar el máximo provecho a la
herramienta para saber cómo comunicar de forma
Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas writes:
> Kevin Chadwick writes:
>
> [...]
>
> > Another issue may be that isn't gpg GNU/GPL and can't be in base.
>
> That's only a detail regarding the whole problem, but there is
> netpgp[1], for which there is no port yet.
>
> [1] http://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entr
Gilles Chehade
> We are getting closer to a stable version of OpenSMTPD
Which to my mind raises the question of how OpenSMTPD is to be
implemented alongside Sendmail in the base system.
Presumably, as per other items that are included in base but not the
default, i.e. DNS services, etcetera, ther
liuru...@vip.sohu.com
misc æ¨å¥½ï¼è¯·cha æ¶ï¼å¹¶è½¬äº¤ç¸.å
³äººå!
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type APPLICATION/DEFANGED which had a
name of ÈçºÎ×öºÃÏúÊÛ?ogb3v.12477DEFANGED-xls]
28 matches
Mail list logo
