© 2012 Conference Corporativo S.C. Asista a los 46 Mejores Cursos en
México de la Serie: ENTREGA-RECEPCIÓN
LIBRO BLANCO Y MEMORIAS DOCUMENTALES Incluye Temas Críticos Sobre:
Cierre de Gestión, Observaciones y Responsabilidades
Cursos, Contenidos y Metodologías Desarrollados en Alianza con las
On 29 July 2012 02:48, Eric Oyen wrote:
> the old steel perkiness brailler
For the record: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perkins_Brailler
oh yeah. thermoform paper. the problem is that any heat tended to permanently
deform it. it did produce some nice sharp braille.
I am not material expert but i think it is possible to make thermoform
"paper" that could be thermoformed multiple times. once when printing then
ironing out. Even i
commands.
It should probably be an TERM=thumb then in an ideal world..
:)
such a device, possibly redesigned in modern way+electronic that would
automatically control it and you get braille tty.
On Sun, 29 Jul 2012, ropers wrote:
On 29 July 2012 02:48, Eric Oyen wrote:
the old steel perkiness brailler
For the record: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perkins_Brailler
Hi Eric,
Eric Oyen wrote on Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 07:57:59AM -0700:
> its too bad there is no way to convert back from html.
That wouldn't be impossible to write; but it would be an awful
lot of work, probably at least two weeks of work for somebody
very familiar with the mandoc(1) internals like
Hi,
Anthony J. Bentley wrote on Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 07:15:07PM -0600:
> Eric Oyen writes:
>> h. that may be another method of viewing a man page, converting
>> it to a text based PDF. that is something to consider.
> mandoc supports PDF output as well.
> For example, with the following com
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 07:25:35PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> Eric Oyen wrote on Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 07:57:59AM -0700:
>
> > its too bad there is no way to convert back from html.
>
> That wouldn't be impossible to write; but it would be an awful
> lot of work, probably at leas
ok. considering the design, I had originally thought it was from the late 19th
century. my bad!.
still, the thing was definitely over engineered. I can't honestly say the same
thing about the newer, lighter plastic models. what I find disturbing is this:
the newer plastic manual brailler is prone
well, the simple ASCII text isn't the problem. its the interface over which I
am viewing it (ssh using vt200). every time I navigate up or down in a man
file, the session redraws the screen and that forces the screen reader to read
from the first line or simply read the last line (whichis the "--mo
> I have a BrailleX ELBA-40 here (40 column braille display). unfortunately, it
> does not work because of a battery failure.
Considering you have found out how cheap the electronics are I expect I
cannot help for some undisclosed reason or that it's actually some
sort of hard to find power failur
On 7/19/12 11:15 AM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 08:45:30PM +0200, [B&G-Consulting] Elmar Bschorer
>> wrote:
>>> What do you mean with "ss20"?
>> Actually a good question. At least for those old enough to remember the
>> Soviet era SS-20 intermediate-range ballistic nucelar mis
Eric Oyen wrote:
btw, an
actual braille embosser (a monster braille printer) costs about $10K.
Hmm, sounds like an entrepreneurial opportunity making a cheaper unit. What's
the input? Unicode?
--
Jack Woehr # "We commonly say we have no time when,
Box 51, Golden CO 80402 # o
that I am not sure of. these embossers are used at places like the American
Printing House for the Blind. considering how much material is printed in
braille monthly, their maintenance is a bit expensive. these are not your
small printer for home use. they are industrial sized units that print more
ËÓ×ØÈÅ ÐÀÑÑÛËÊÈ ÏÎ ÓÊÐÀÈÍÅ
Âàì - ïî÷òîâàÿ ïîñûëêà
Ïðåäëàãàåòñÿ ðàññûëêà
Ìû êëèåíòîâ ïðèâåäåì
Ðàäîñòü ôèðìàì ïðèíåñåì
Ñòîèìîñòü ïî Óêðàèíå 800 ãðí, 3.9 ìëí ïîëó÷àòåëåé
Ñòîèìîñòü ïî Êèåâó 700 ãðí, 1.7 ìëí ïîëó÷àòåëåé
Ñòîèìîñòü ïî îáëàñòÿì Óêðàèíû - 400 ãðí
E-mail: mailair2...@aol.com , ICQ: ×9Ç-17
On 07/29/12 16:18, Rob Payne wrote:
On 7/19/12 11:15 AM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 08:45:30PM +0200, [B&G-Consulting] Elmar Bschorer wrote:
What do you mean with "ss20"?
Actually a good question. At least for those old enough to remember the
Soviet era SS-20 intermediate-ran
Eric Oyen wrote:
120 pound bond paper is rather hard on the print heads they use (and
its the only stuff that will reasonably hold braille).
Bond paper is traditional. Haven't they figured out a way to emboss thin sheets
of polymer yet?
--
Jack Woehr # "We commonly say we have
they have. however, thermoform paper is actually more expensive than standard
paper stock. also, the "thermo" brailler (embosser) isn't cheap either.
now, there are small form factor varieties that will work on 3x5 sized sheets.
those run about $500 and are good for labeling prescription bottles,
18 matches
Mail list logo
