Stuart Henderson writes:
Hi Stuart,
Also ps(1) output seems to confirm that named process limit is the
entire memory of the machine.
root@openbsd: /var/named/tmp # ps -ax -v | head
PID STAT TIME SL RE PAGEIN VSZ RSS LIM TSIZ %CPU %MEM
COMMAND
Stuart Henderson writes:
> On 2012-04-20, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote:
>> Just discovered that under Linux bind seems to use 5 threads (2
>> processors). Under the same VM config on OpenBSD bind seems to have
>> no threads (using T under top(1)).
>
> In 5.0 and 5.1 threads are entirely done in user
On 2012/04/21 11:54, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote:
> > In -current this has changed however in OpenBSD BIND is built without
> > threads anyway.
>
> Doesn't this affect BIND's performance?
> Anyway, a stress test will tell...
Untested but in 5.1 and earlier I doubt you will see an improvement with
thr
On 2012/04/21 11:51, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote:
> Thanks for the good explanations.
> I always start bind either at system boot, or manually under the root
> user using the rc.d script. Therefore the class should be "daemon"
> according to your explanations and from what I see in
> /etc/rc.d/rc.subr.
> that is ... at least a bit fishy. the referencing rules distinguish
> between tables in the anchor and "further up".
>
I understand that. I just wanted to make sure it was not a forgeten
case. It not like it's a problem but it should be documented if it's a
limitation.
Le 20 avril 2012 20:42, M
630f653e57g'FHkyhg.
e,h+ g7f28c
eg eh
i>i"g)ff3e.d=
ff"i
h1e2g;h*ff-#fh2g *f e
0f: e="h&c
e=g93ei=e+f g>g(ce 0i.e3i e9e9 g&>hf)"g(c eg
<:f 8e e e?eh0f0i*f!fg<d8+g%(f, g$g#
he#$e/;e
f%-ff i#f
e'f23e
c
e" h$h%g
6 matches
Mail list logo
