Just see news.groups.proposals:
" REQUEST FOR DISCUSSION (RFD)
moderated group comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.announce
This is a formal Request for Discussion (RFD) to remove moderated
newsgroup comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.announce."
---
Is really no one interessted on t
sc...@web.de writes:
I preffer newsgroups than mailing lists filling my mailbox.
I am in this mailing list only because also "comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.misc"
is dying. Perhaps the next openbsd newsgroup to be deleted.
Is realy no one interested on the newsgroups?
What's wrong with gmane.org and the
Ci sono luoghi sconosciuti nel mondo, dove trovi sempre un uomo, la sua
storia, i suoi oggetti..
Ci sono capanne, villaggi sperduti e mulattiere nascoste, dove la
millenaria tradizione,artigianale ed artistica, produce ancora oggetti
unici e meravigliosi.
Articoli di ogni genere e fattura, ch
On 2011-11-19, John Tate wrote:
> Is this information helpful...
>
> john@rothbard ~$ ulimit -a
> core file size (blocks, -c) unlimited
> data seg size (kbytes, -d) 524288
> file size (blocks, -f) unlimited
> max locked memory (kbytes, -l) 1354329
> max memor
web.de> writes:
> Is really no one interessted on the group?
Everyone knows that OpenBSD is dying and you should too.
On 2011-11-23, sc...@web.de wrote:
> I preffer newsgroups than mailing lists filling my mailbox.
> I am in this mailing list only because also "comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.misc"
> is dying. Perhaps the next openbsd newsgroup to be deleted.
I find that gmane.os.openbsd.misc / gmane.os.openbsd.announce
On 2011-11-22, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> i haven't tried dnscache for at leat 5 years, i'm sure things have improved
> there.
ha, ha ha. The last release was 10 years ago. I see some uses for the other
components of djbdns (although there are better alternatives in most cases)
but dnscache has al
>> BIND lumps these two functions together, with the effect of confusing
>> people, but they are really two separate tasks...
It allows you to lump these two functions together (not sure if this is
still true about BIND 10), but it is still recommended to split them.
> Unless I'm misreading you,
On 2011-11-20, quartz wrote:
>>supports DiffServ or 802.1q
>> priority tags.
>
> by any chance, is there a utility that comes with 4.9 release or through
> the ports tree that can use to test this easily?
In 4.9 you can use numeric tos values with ping -T or nc -T.
In 5.0 you can use numeric val
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011, sc...@web.de wrote:
> From: sc...@web.de
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 10:32:04
> Subject: comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.announce
...
> I preffer newsgroups than mailing lists filling my mailbox.
Note you can read this mailing list as a newsgroup or read it on the
Thank you for the information about gmane and its *local* newsserver.
I suppose you are aware that this is not a substitute of USENET,
although it works well and has nothing wrong. It is an archive,
it is not USENET, no one writes thing to be archived inmediately,
it is not the place for posting.
Andreas Vvgele wrote:
"Usenet *is* dying: http://usenet.dex.de/de.ALL.html";
Perhaps, but is that a reason to kill it? There is no better
alternative to USENET for that, what USENET is meant to do.
There is only WWW-chaos.
Your statistics only show that it is not as frequented as 2001,
but -- i
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 12:54:32PM +, sc...@web.de wrote:
>
> [...] blabla [...]
>
> I cannot see any reason not to forward OpenBSD anouncements to
> comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.announce.
>
Feel free
--
Gilles Chehade
http://www.poolp.org@poolpOrg
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 10:44:38 + (UTC)
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >> BIND lumps these two functions together, with the effect of
> >> confusing people, but they are really two separate tasks...
>
> It allows you to lump these two functions together (not sure if this
> is still true about BIND 1
wrote:
> I cannot see any reason not to forward OpenBSD anouncements to
> comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.announce.
And yet it appears you have not done so.
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
wrote:
> This is a formal Request for Discussion (RFD) to remove moderated
> newsgroup comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.announce."
>
> ---
>
> Is really no one interessted on the group?
Apparently not. I was quite surprised when two years ago one Florian
Rehnisch, who I had never heard o
Christian Weisgerber wrote:
I have a very brocken internet connection, sometimes through WLAN,
sometimes through UMTS. I am using OpenBSD because the drivers
seems to work better than in FreeBSD, since few months ago, and
I dont know for how much time I am using OpenBSD in my main Computer.
The
I will keep that in mind! =D
On 22 November 2011 20:58, richo wrote:
> On 22/11/11 17:27 -0200, Alexandre Ulfeldt wrote:
>
>> by the way...can everybody see my reply?!?
>>
>
> No.
>
>
> --
> richo || Today's excuse:
>
> Telecommunications is downshifting.
> http://blog.psych0tik.net
>
--
*Al
On 22/11/11 19:27, Russell Garrison wrote:
I had some experience with this and found another thread where the
best thing to do for your routing is to have only one /(32-n) mask and
then all /32 for any given subnet and rdomain combination on a system.
I have set up my system accordingly and my ad
On Nov 23 12:54:32, sc...@web.de wrote:
> I cannot see any reason not to forward OpenBSD anouncements to
> comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.announce.
So why didn't you forward them?
Hi,
I'm under OpenBSD 5.0, and I would like to compile a kernel without INET6.
# cd /usr/src
# wget ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/5.0/sys.tar.gz
# tar zxvf sys.tar.gz
I edited /usr/src/sys/conf/GENERIC, and disabled INET6 (line 59, #INET6)
# cd /usr/src/sys/arch/`arch -s`/conf
# config GEN
On Nov 23 15:49:42, Julien Crapovich wrote:
> I'm under OpenBSD 5.0, and I would like to compile a kernel without INET6.
Howls of derisive laughter, Bruce!
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 15:49:42 +
Julien Crapovich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm under OpenBSD 5.0, and I would like to compile a kernel without
> INET6.
>
> # cd /usr/src
> # wget ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/5.0/sys.tar.gz
> # tar zxvf sys.tar.gz
>
> I edited /usr/src/sys/conf/GENERIC, and disa
Ah, there is already a thread ...
Sorry for being a bad moderator, but maybe better than none...
@naddy, I used OpenBSD only vary occasional in the basic install,
so never had a question or sth to tribuate.
Gmane, very good, I'm using zhis right now.
{security-,}annou...@lists.openbsd.de --> cu
> Gmane, very good, I'm using zhis right now.
No posts in gmane.os.openbsd.announce since Nov 2010 (48-release).
Hmmm,
flori
* Pascal Stumpf [2011-11-20 01:25]:
> I think what Marc meant is that whatis.db/mandoc.db should be in the
> same directory as their corresponding manpages.
i think you're reading that into his words, his point (rightly) was a
file per dir (wherever that file actually lives) vs one global file.
* Jussi Peltola [2011-11-20 04:09]:
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 08:58:46PM -0500, quartz wrote:
> > is there a way to set up altq+priq on an internet connection with highly
> > variable/unknown bandwidth?
> >
> > I'd like to create a simple one layer queue system that prioritizes empty
> > ACKs ove
On 2011-11-23, sc...@web.de wrote:
> Thank you for the information about gmane and its *local* newsserver.
>
> I suppose you are aware that this is not a substitute of USENET,
> although it works well and has nothing wrong. It is an archive,
> it is not USENET, no one writes thing to be archived i
diffs might be accepted, but basically: you broke it, you fix it.
On 2011-11-23, Julien Crapovich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm under OpenBSD 5.0, and I would like to compile a kernel without INET6.
>
> # cd /usr/src
> # wget ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/5.0/sys.tar.gz
> # tar zxvf sys.tar.gz
>
> I e
On 2011-11-23, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
> so when unbound is going to hit the base?
when someone who is capable of and interested in integrating it has the time
to do the work.
It appears to me that the OpenBSD SNMP daemon: /usr/sbin/snmpd should create
it's own socket file: /var/run/snmpd.sock upon startup. There seems to be an
error which occurs at startup:
# /usr/sbin/snmpd -d
startup
fatal: snmpe: failed to bind SNMP UDP socket
check_child: lost child: snmp engine ex
I'm attempting to setup a transparent bridge on an OpenBSD 5.0 VM
running under ESXi 5.0.
There is one vmnic with two Virtual Machine Port Groups one for each
side of the bridge set to a different VLAN ID.
The port groups are set to accept promiscuous traffic.
Under OpenBSD the interfaces ar
On Nov 23, 2011, at 19:45, Josh Grosse wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 04:41:09PM -0500, Brian Hechinger wrote:
>
>> Anyone know where I should be looking here to figure out why this
>> isn't working?
>
> Brian, I don't know if you've received other advice yet, but the key here is
> to -post- co
290205
[IMAGE]
Pms de Mixico prestigiada firma de Capacitacisn presenta:
Planeacisn Maestra de la Produccisn
5 de Diciembre, Guadalajara, Jalisco. Experto consultor Lic. Ariel
Valero.
Obtenga las herramientas necesarias para alcanzar un sptimo desempeqo en
su funcisn.
Empresa Registrada ante
Am 24.11.2011 05:16, schrieb Brian Hechinger:
> On Nov 23, 2011, at 19:45, Josh Grosse wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 04:41:09PM -0500, Brian Hechinger wrote:
>>
>>> Anyone know where I should be looking here to figure out why this
>>> isn't working?
>>
>> Brian, I don't know if you've recei
35 matches
Mail list logo
