On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 02:06:51 +0400
Alexander Polakov wrote:
> I am probably misunderstanding something, but are DUID's supposed to
> be used in place of device filenames in fstab? I suppose they are,
> so this looks strange to me:
>
> % sudo mount f777cc5bbeded528.a
> mount: can't find fstab ent
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 05:36:50 +0200
Tomas Bodzar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> will try ktrace and log output of Citrix too. Yesterday when I saw
> that crash word in output of last I thought that maybe I can enter
> ddb. Will test that today and you can expect outputs. Anyway no need
> to worry about it righ
On 04/11/11 23:48, Alexander Hall wrote:
> On 04/11/11 23:34, Matt S wrote:
>> Hello Everyone:
>>
>> I am using 4.8 RELEASE. Given the following pf.conf, would anyone be able
>> to
>> tell me why gre0 is not being skipped?
>>
>> set skip on lo
>> set skip on gre0
>> set skip on enc0
>
> You nee
Hi anyone got any insight on this?
I keep getting flooded with messages from sensorsd.
Thanks.
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 06:23:18PM +0100, Rodolfo Gouveia wrote:
> Hi all.
> I got this on a server with OpenBSD 4.7 and a ciss0:
> sensorsd[10636]: ciss0.drive0: pfail, WARN
> sensorsd[10636
On 09.04.2011 13:40, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2011-04-08, Ludo Smissaert wrote:
azalia0 at pci1 dev 0 function 1 "ATI Radeon HD 4000 HD Audio" rev 0x00:
apic 2 int 17 (irq 10)
azalia0: no supported codecs
azalia0: initialization failure, detaching
build a newer kernel from after this commit
On 09:20 Tue 12 Apr , jirib wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 02:06:51 +0400
> Alexander Polakov wrote:
>
> > I am probably misunderstanding something, but are DUID's supposed to
> > be used in place of device filenames in fstab? I suppose they are,
> > so this looks strange to me:
> >
> > % sudo mou
On Apr 12 12:59:16, Alexander Polakov wrote:
> * Jan Stary [110412 08:47]:
> > What version of OpenBSD are you using?
>
> I'm using 4.9-current snapshot updated yesterday.
>
> > On Apr 12 02:06:51, Alexander Polakov wrote:
> > > I am probably misunderstanding something, but are DUID's supposed t
On 2011-04-12, jirib wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 02:06:51 +0400
> Alexander Polakov wrote:
>
>> I am probably misunderstanding something, but are DUID's supposed to
>> be used in place of device filenames in fstab? I suppose they are,
>> so this looks strange to me:
>>
>> % sudo mount f777cc5bb
On 2011 Apr 12 (Tue) at 09:20:27 +0200 (+0200), jirib wrote:
:On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 02:06:51 +0400
:Alexander Polakov wrote:
:
:> I am probably misunderstanding something, but are DUID's supposed to
:> be used in place of device filenames in fstab? I suppose they are,
:> so this looks strange to me:
On 2011-04-12, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2011-04-12, jirib wrote:
>> On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 02:06:51 +0400
>> Alexander Polakov wrote:
>>
>>> I am probably misunderstanding something, but are DUID's supposed to
>>> be used in place of device filenames in fstab? I suppose they are,
>>> so this lo
* Sergey Bronnikov [110412 14:29]:
> On 09:20 Tue 12 Apr , jirib wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 02:06:51 +0400
> > Alexander Polakov wrote:
> >
> > > I am probably misunderstanding something, but are DUID's supposed to
> > > be used in place of device filenames in fstab? I suppose they are,
> >
this looks like the right thing, OK from me.
Anyone else want to comment? krw or jsing?
On 2011 Apr 12 (Tue) at 02:06:51 +0400 (+0400), Alexander Polakov wrote:
:I am probably misunderstanding something, but are DUID's supposed to be
:used in place of device filenames in fstab? I suppose they a
* Stuart Henderson [110412 15:48]:
> On 2011-04-12, jirib wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 02:06:51 +0400
> > Alexander Polakov wrote:
> >
> >> I am probably misunderstanding something, but are DUID's supposed to
> >> be used in place of device filenames in fstab? I suppose they are,
> >> so this
On 12.04.2011 14:52, Owain Ainsworth wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:24:05AM +0200, Ludo Smissaert wrote:
azalia0: no supported codecs
That is fine, expected even.
We don't support azailia on the audio interfaces on graphics cards
yet. This is only needed for HDMI audio, which you won't be
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Alexander Polakov wrote:
> Tip: you can use DUID in a script. Ever thought about mounting disks by
> DUID in /etc/hotplug/attach?
+1
ciao,
David
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:24:05AM +0200, Ludo Smissaert wrote:
> On 09.04.2011 13:40, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >On 2011-04-08, Ludo Smissaert wrote:
> >>azalia0 at pci1 dev 0 function 1 "ATI Radeon HD 4000 HD Audio" rev 0x00:
> >>apic 2 int 17 (irq 10)
> >>azalia0: no supported codecs
> >>azalia
Si no puede ver esta imagen, haga clic en el siguiente link para ver la
versiC3n online
http://www.panamacorreo.com/mail/display.php?M=176375&C=45ce1208ba75b76cbc4c66d66bf5a405&S=23&L=1&N=22
Copyright 2011 - Todos los Derechos Reservados
Este es un mensaje directo y legal, enviado a su ema
Hello
One of our IPSec gateways is multihomed, for this gateway i was trying
to setup
IPSec in transport mode over the secondary internet interface. Using the
following
configuration.
--- snip ---
ike esp transport from $LOCAL_PEER to $REMOTE_PEER \
psk 0xdeadbeef
--- snip ---
LOCAL_PEER
On Tuesday 12 April 2011, Alexander Polakov wrote:
> I am probably misunderstanding something, but are DUID's supposed to be
> used in place of device filenames in fstab? I suppose they are,
> so this looks strange to me:
>
> % sudo mount f777cc5bbeded528.a
> mount: can't find fstab entry for f777c
On 2011-04-12, Alexander Polakov wrote:
> * Stuart Henderson [110412 15:48]:
>> On 2011-04-12, jirib wrote:
>> > On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 02:06:51 +0400
>> > Alexander Polakov wrote:
>> >
>> >> I am probably misunderstanding something, but are DUID's supposed to
>> >> be used in place of device file
Looks to me like your hard drive went to predictive failure, then
failed. Maybe check for firmware updates on the drives and controllers,
but it's probably already too late for the failed drive.
On 4/12/2011 4:59 AM, Rodolfo Gouveia wrote:
Hi anyone got any insight on this?
I keep getting flo
Hello @misc:
I am up against a stumper. I have a Site-to-Site IPSEC VPN working
beautifully.
However, I would like the remote site to route all of its traffic through the
VPN. After googling, I seemed to come up with a suggestion to do a route
change
-net 0.0.0.0/0 which didn't work well.
22 matches
Mail list logo