Re: CARP hash vuln

2010-12-21 Thread David Coppa
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Fernando Quintero wrote: > some comment? > > http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2010/Dec/200 I'm not able to provide a solution, but this is of course a bug that needs to be fixed. I think claudio@ or henning@ are the right persons to ping... Ciao, David

Re: 64 bit cvsup pkg?

2010-12-21 Thread Rune Lynge
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Indunil Jayasooriya wrote: > I installed OpenBSD 64 bit. I want to update it by using cvsup.But, I am not > able to find a *cvsup* 64 bit pkg . cvsup is ONLY_FOR_ARCHS = i386, but there is csup, see . Rune

Re: CARP hash vuln

2010-12-21 Thread Marco Pfatschbacher
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 09:34:01AM +0100, David Coppa wrote: > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Fernando Quintero > wrote: > > some comment? > > > > http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2010/Dec/200 > > I'm not able to provide a solution, but this is of course a bug that > needs to be fixed. If you look

Re: PF and States

2010-12-21 Thread Gabriel Linder
On 12/20/10 15:52, Kevin Wilcox wrote: On 19 December 2010 07:16, Henning Brauer wrote: you're way off ;) I had 2 million during a DDoS. things got a bit slow but everything worked. Henning - out of curiosity, what were the specs on that hardware? It may be interesting to know of any specifi

Re: dhcpd troubleshooting

2010-12-21 Thread Damon McMahon
On 20 December 2010 23:28, Kenneth R Westerback wrote: > On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 09:23:34PM +1030, Damon McMahon wrote: >> On 19 December 2010 23:28, Kenneth R Westerback wrote: >> > On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 10:29:56PM +1030, Damon McMahon wrote: >> >> Greetings, >> >> >> >> I have a troublesome D

Re: dhcpd troubleshooting

2010-12-21 Thread Kenneth R Westerback
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 09:43:17PM +1030, Damon McMahon wrote: > On 20 December 2010 23:28, Kenneth R Westerback > wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 09:23:34PM +1030, Damon McMahon wrote: > >> On 19 December 2010 23:28, Kenneth R Westerback > >> wrote: > >> > On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 10:29:56PM

correspondance et mariage

2010-12-21 Thread amsi correspondance (via Multiply)
This is a MIME-encoded message that elise07652 sent through Multiply. To read it, you need a HTML-capable mail client.

Re: PF and States

2010-12-21 Thread Henning Brauer
* Kevin Wilcox [2010-12-20 16:01]: > On 19 December 2010 07:16, Henning Brauer wrote: > > * Ryan McBride [2010-12-03 09:52]: > >> More than 100,000. I havn't tested lately (planning to do so soo), but I > >> would expect somewhere closer to 500,000. > > you're way off ;) > > I had 2 million duri

Re: 64 bit cvsup pkg?

2010-12-21 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2010-12-21, Rune Lynge wrote: > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Indunil Jayasooriya > wrote: >> I installed OpenBSD 64 bit. I want to update it by using cvsup.But, I am not >> able to find a *cvsup* 64 bit pkg . > > cvsup is ONLY_FOR_ARCHS = i386, but there is csup, see >

Re: add new disk

2010-12-21 Thread Orestes Leal R.
This was the procedure I follow in 4.3 sucessfully, the same I did in 4.8 and doesn't work: -bash-3.2# fdisk -i sd1 - -- ATTENTION - UPDATING MASTER BOOT RECORD -- --

Re: add new disk

2010-12-21 Thread Orestes Leal R.
Otto, this is not 4.8 it's 4.3, so this is a error now and not a warning, what I must changte in the comnand line to make it work with 4.8? LeaL This is not 4.8. This warning has been "upgraded" to an error now. Read my previous reply and follow the advise in it. -Otto /dev/sd1a:

Re: add new disk

2010-12-21 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 08:09:58AM -0600, Orestes Leal R. wrote: > This was the procedure I follow in 4.3 sucessfully, the same I did > in 4.8 and doesn't work: > > -bash-3.2# fdisk -i sd1 > > - > -- ATTENTION - UPDATING MAS

Re: add new disk

2010-12-21 Thread Tomas Bodzar
Do you need it in Braille? Couple of people said to you what to do. Use raw device and not block device. Is it so hard to read man page for newfs to see that in DESCRIPTION part? On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Orestes Leal R. wrote: > Otto, this is not 4.8 it's 4.3, so this is a error now and

Re: add new disk

2010-12-21 Thread Kenneth R Westerback
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 08:25:35AM -0600, Orestes Leal R. wrote: > Otto, this is not 4.8 it's 4.3, so this is a error now and not a warning, > what I must changte in the comnand line to make it work with 4.8? > > LeaL newfs /dev/rsd1a Ken > > > > > >This is not 4.8. This warning has been

Re: add new disk

2010-12-21 Thread Orestes Leal R.
No, I don't, I'm at work and here don't have a 4.8 box, only 4.6, By raw you mean use /dev/sd0 instead /dev/sd0a for example? Do you need it in Braille? Couple of people said to you what to do. Use raw device and not block device. Is it so hard to read man page for newfs to see that in DESCRI

Re: add new disk

2010-12-21 Thread roberth
On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 08:25:35 -0600 "Orestes Leal R." wrote: > Otto, this is not 4.8 it's 4.3, so this is a error now and not a > warning, what I must changte in the comnand line to make it work with > 4.8? *sigh* you have been told what is wrong before, but lets end this. "newfs /dev/sd1a" was

Re: add new disk

2010-12-21 Thread Raimo Niskanen
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 08:48:14AM -0600, Orestes Leal R. wrote: > No, I don't, I'm at work and here don't have a 4.8 box, only 4.6, > By raw you mean use /dev/sd0 instead /dev/sd0a for example? http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=newfs Search for 'raw' or read the second paragraph in th

Re: add new disk

2010-12-21 Thread Orestes Leal R.
Thanks robert, that's a simple explanation, thanks, LeaL *sigh* you have been told what is wrong before, but lets end this. "newfs /dev/sd1a" was wrong but was handled gracefully. and it is still wrong but now it bombs out. newfs works on raw devices. raw devices start with 'r'. the right comm

Re: add new disk

2010-12-21 Thread William Boshuck
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 02:59:12PM +0100, roberth wrote: > On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 08:25:35 -0600 > "Orestes Leal R." wrote: > > > Otto, this is not 4.8 it's 4.3, so this is a error now and not a > > warning, what I must changte in the comnand line to make it work with > > 4.8? > > *sigh* > you have

4.6 box periodic 100% cpu on vmware

2010-12-21 Thread Matthew Sullenberger
I've been playing with OpenBSD for a little while now, and really love it when I need to throw together a quick firewall, web server, dhcp server, etc. I've got on firewall that I've been using for a little while now, OpenBSD 4.6, running on a VMWare ESXi box. It normally performs fine, and it is d

Re: 4.6 box periodic 100% cpu on vmware

2010-12-21 Thread Ahlsen-Girard, Edward F CTR USAF AFSOC AFSOC/A6OK
Matthew Sullenberger wrote at 2010-12-21 18:22:48: > > I've been playing with OpenBSD for a little while now, and really love it > when I need to throw together a quick firewall, web server, dhcp server, > etc. I've got on firewall that I've been using for a little while now, > OpenBSD 4.6, runnin

Re: 4.6 box periodic 100% cpu on vmware

2010-12-21 Thread R0me0 ***
Without run obsd, occurs the same thing ? 2010/12/21 Matthew Sullenberger > I've been playing with OpenBSD for a little while now, and really love it > when I need to throw together a quick firewall, web server, dhcp server, > etc. I've got on firewall that I've been using for a little while n

Re: [OT] Mail Archive Management

2010-12-21 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2010-12-20, Joachim Schipper wrote: > Similarly, IMAP has a SEARCH extension. Most IMAP servers will keep > indices for you, but getting the mail client to issue the proper > commands (instead of searching locally) may take some doc-reading. In Mutt, use = instead of ~ to search server-side. e

Especial Regalos de navidad!

2010-12-21 Thread ARMYTECH Hardware
[IMAGE]*Los precio estan expresados en pesos argentinos e incluye IVA. En caso de no querer recibir mas este correo por favor presione AQUI .

randomize spamd-setup time in cron?

2010-12-21 Thread frantisek holop
hi there, i was wondering if it's a good idea to randomize the time of the spamd-setup cronjob. are there some numbers how big traffic are we generating with this? is this an issue? -f -- think carefully before wishing, it might just come true.

Re: pfsync defer, ipv6 delay problem

2010-12-21 Thread Stuart Henderson
Try and get the difference between netstat -sp pfsync with a single ipv6 connection. Does it correspond with any of the packets/states discarded? On 2010-12-17, Marco Fretz wrote: > Hi, > > I have a problem with ipv6 connections and firewalls with enabled > pfsync defer. IPv4 inital packets are

Re: pfsync nic problem.

2010-12-21 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2010-12-19, Alessandro Baggi wrote: > Hi list. I've a little question about pfsync. Supposing to have two > firewall, with 3 nic, one for lan, one for wan and one for DMZ, and > supposing a similar scenario: > > firewall 1 firewall 2 > > WAN: re0WAN: xl0

Re: IP bridge was briefly working now is not, OpenBSD 4.8, amd64, bridge from PC wifi to Beagleboard

2010-12-21 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2010-12-20, brett wrote: > On the OpenBSD PC I created a bridge: > > # ifconfig nfe0 inet 192.168.10.12 netmask 255.255.255.0 > # ifconfig bridge0 create > In /etc/hostname.nfe0 is the single word: up > In /etc/hostname.otus0 is the single word: up > In /etc/bridgename.bridge0 is: add nfe0 add

Re: IP bridge was briefly working now is not, OpenBSD 4.8, amd64, bridge from PC wifi to Beagleboard

2010-12-21 Thread brett mm
On 22 December 2010 10:26, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2010-12-20, brett wrote: >> On the OpenBSD PC I created a bridge: >> >> # ifconfig nfe0 inet 192.168.10.12 netmask 255.255.255.0 >> # ifconfig bridge0 create >> In /etc/hostname.nfe0 is the single word: up >> In /etc/hostname.otus0 is the si

avis de suspension de votre compte !

2010-12-21 Thread centre-credit-carte
[IMAGE][IMAGE][IMAGE] Chhre client de Visa Carte Nous avons ricemment ditermini que diffirents ordinateurs connectis ` votre compte Verified by visa, Mot de passe et les ichecs multiples itaient prisents avant la connexion. Nous avons maintenant besoin de vous pour confirmer les informations de v

Re: 4.6 box periodic 100% cpu on vmware

2010-12-21 Thread Tomas Bodzar
Let's skip that bad idea to have virtual FW for now. OpenBSD improved support for virtualization (especially VMware platforms) between 4.6 and 4.8 a lot. There is in kernel implementation of VMware tools and in current you have even package for support of X, clipboard and other stuff. On Tue, Dec