On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 10:45:01PM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> I've lost 3 due to washing...
I've revived many with a toothbrush and alcohol.
It's not the water, but all of the stuff that deposits on the thing.
Still, just take the backups...
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 10:45:01PM -0500, sl...@peereboom.us wrote:
>
> I've lost 3 due to washing...
So, stop washing your clothes ;-)
> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 05:28:06PM -0700, Greg Thomas wrote:
> >On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 7:11 AM, Marco Peereboom
> >wrote:
> >
> > USB sticks
Gregory Edigarov writes:
> Where is that 'hardware switch'?
on my SL500 it's a little slider switch on the front, to the left and
down from where you fumble your trackpad
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of
image001.jpg]
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 11:57:31AM +0200, Marcus Larsson wrote:
> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 01:52:37PM +0200, Marcus Larsson wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > I have a server acting as a router and firewall running 4.6-stable
> > from Apr 24 with an Intel quad port NIC.
> >
> > In short I have problems wi
Hello,
Is anyone using OpenSMTPD in production already? If the answer is
yes..which numbers are handling by OPenSMTPD? (email average by day,
etc...)
Regards,
Alvaro
--
Alvaro Mantilla Gimenez
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 06:49:54AM -0600, Alvaro Mantilla Gimenez wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is anyone using OpenSMTPD in production already? If the answer is
> yes..which numbers are handling by OPenSMTPD? (email average by day,
> etc...)
>
> Regards,
>
> Alvaro
>
don't. there are heavy changes
* Daniel Melameth [2010-05-22 03:58]:
> I've considered migrating my macro-based interface names to interface
> groups, but, it appears, altq does not grok interface groups--and pfctl
> spits back a pfctl: SIOCGIFMTU: Device not configured when I try. Am I
> missing something here? pf.conf's BNF
Good afternoon gents,
I am building up a server with basically a solid state drive for the OS
and a 1 TB hard drive for the datas.
In order to maximize the life time of the SSD, I will avoir mounting
slides that sustain continuous or sparsed write access.
Could you briefly let me know the do's a
Yeah; ignore dos and donts the ssd, if of any quality, will do fine.
On May 22, 2010, at 10:03 AM, jean-francois
wrote:
Good afternoon gents,
I am building up a server with basically a solid state drive for the
OS
and a 1 TB hard drive for the datas.
In order to maximize the life time
At one point, I saw *somewhere* a sample ruleset for pf using the new
4.7 syntax. However, neither I nor my usage of google seems to be
able to dig up that web page again.
Could someone post a quick link to the ruleset, so that I can start
understanding the new syntax?
thanks.
On Sat, 22 May 2010 17:03:12 +0200
jean-francois wrote:
> Good afternoon gents,
>
> I am building up a server with basically a solid state drive for the
> OS and a 1 TB hard drive for the datas.
>
> In order to maximize the life time of the SSD, I will avoir mounting
> slides that sustain conti
"Mike M" writes:
> At one point, I saw *somewhere* a sample ruleset for pf using the new
> 4.7 syntax. However, neither I nor my usage of google seems to be
> able to dig up that web page again.
a little odd that the pf faq has not been updated, it must be an
oversigth. But anyway, the slides
On Sat, 22 May 2010 17:03:12 +0200
jean-francois wrote:
> In order to maximize the life time of the SSD, I will avoir mounting
> slides that sustain continuous or sparsed write access.
Oh and here, dont try to be clever or worry too much, just use it like
rotating rust drives.
On 5/22/2010 at 7:03 PM pe...@bsdly.net wrote:
|"Mike M" writes:
|
|> At one point, I saw *somewhere* a sample ruleset for pf using the
new
|> 4.7 syntax. However, neither I nor my usage of google seems to be
|> able to dig up that web page again.
|
|a little odd that the pf faq has not been up
I have a pair of freshly installed OpenBSD 4.7/amd64-RELEASE systems.
They're running redundant failover pairs with fw1 being the master.
It seems I've got a problem getting pfsync to properly pass a full
bulk update over, so longer term sessions time out when the MASTER
takes over for the BACKUP
* Peter N. M. Hansteen [2010-05-22 19:08]:
> a little odd that the pf faq has not been updated
huh? it has been updated, the same day 4.7 has been released
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Servic
Henning Brauer writes:
> * Peter N. M. Hansteen [2010-05-22 19:08]:
>> a little odd that the pf faq has not been updated
>
> huh? it has been updated, the same day 4.7 has been released
It looks like they missed a spot in the examples at
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/example1.html then. The ot
On 5/22/2010 at 7:26 PM Henning Brauer wrote:
|* Peter N. M. Hansteen [2010-05-22 19:08]:
|> a little odd that the pf faq has not been updated
|
|huh? it has been updated, the same day 4.7 has been released
|
=
I see the pre-4.7 info here:
http://openbsd.org/faq/pf/example1.html#
* Mike M [2010-05-22 19:45]:
> On 5/22/2010 at 7:26 PM Henning Brauer wrote:
>
> |* Peter N. M. Hansteen [2010-05-22 19:08]:
> |> a little odd that the pf faq has not been updated
> |
> |huh? it has been updated, the same day 4.7 has been released
> |
> =
>
>
> I see the pre-4.7 i
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Mike M wrote:
> On 5/22/2010 at 7:26 PM Henning Brauer wrote:
>
> |* Peter N. M. Hansteen [2010-05-22 19:08]:
> |> a little odd that the pf faq has not been updated
> |
> |huh? it has been updated, the same day 4.7 has been released
> |
> =
>
>
> I s
On 5/22/2010 at 7:56 PM Henning Brauer wrote:
|* Mike M [2010-05-22 19:45]:
|> On 5/22/2010 at 7:26 PM Henning Brauer wrote:
|>
|> |* Peter N. M. Hansteen [2010-05-22 19:08]:
|> |> a little odd that the pf faq has not been updated
|> |
|> |huh? it has been updated, the same day 4.7 has been rel
Newsletter CentralTECH
http://www.editorialpoulbert.com.ar/Newsletter/nuevas-carreras/ingles/ingles.html
/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /
Nuevas Carreras de Ingles
* Ingles Tecnico *
Examen: TOEFL - Test of English as a Foreign Language
*Ingles Para Todos *
Examen
On May 22 17:03:12, jean-francois wrote:
> Good afternoon gents,
>
> I am building up a server with basically a solid state drive for the OS
> and a 1 TB hard drive for the datas.
>
> In order to maximize the life time of the SSD, I will avoir mounting
> slides that sustain continuous or sparsed
Hello,
May I use with peace of mind the softraid device of OpenBSD 4.7 in
'small production' (personal servers for home use actually) ?
I had understood that as of 4.5 and before the softraid was still under
lot of development, so my question.
Thanks & Regards
Jean-FranC'ois
On 5/22/2010 12:21 PM, Marco Peereboom wrote:
Yeah; ignore dos and donts the ssd, if of any quality, will do fine.
That has been my experience with SSDs on OpenBSD and Linux. I've been
using an inexpensive Kingston SSD for about six months now, it works
great. Here is an older dmesg from it:
On Sat, 22 May 2010 21:12:00 +0200
jean-francois wrote:
> Hello,
>
> May I use with peace of mind the softraid device of OpenBSD 4.7 in
> 'small production' (personal servers for home use actually) ?
>
> I had understood that as of 4.5 and before the softraid was still
> under lot of developmen
Am 21.05.2010 um 01:53 schrieb Tomoyuki Sakurai:
You need additional two OSPF routers for L3 redundancy (claudio@
explained why in a paper).
Thanks for the hint, Tomoyuki.
I have now ospfd running on both firewalls, which was one necessary
stop towards success.
Axel
---
axel@chaos1.de PGP
Am 21.05.2010 um 12:55 schrieb Axel Rau:
Am 20.05.2010 um 22:07 schrieb Reyk Floeter:
I will try the following with unmanaged switches, no RST:
On fbsd:
fbsd# ifconfig em0 up
fbsd# ifconfig em1 up
fbsd# ifconfig lagg0 create
fbsd# ifconfig lagg0 laggproto failover laggport em0 laggport em1
Le samedi 22 mai 2010 C 21:38 +0200, Robert a C)crit :
> On Sat, 22 May 2010 21:12:00 +0200
> jean-francois wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > May I use with peace of mind the softraid device of OpenBSD 4.7 in
> > 'small production' (personal servers for home use actually) ?
> >
> > I had understood
2010/5/21 J.C. Roberts :
> On Thu, 20 May 2010 23:17:25 +0200 patrick kristensen
> wrote:
>> 2010/5/17 J.C. Roberts :
>> > On Fri, 14 May 2010 17:11:16 +0200 patrick kristensen
>> > wrote:
>> >> Hi
>> >>
>> >> I have 4.6-RELEASE on a lenovo x200s system with Ericsson F3507g
>> >> Mobile Broadband
I have the idea that to make DHCP work over IPSec on my VPN gateway, I have
to make dhcpd listen on lo0, and then have dhcrelay listen on enc0 and relay
to lo0. (dhcpd runs on same machine)
It seems from the dhcrelay man page that this is possible and that the -o
switch is even enabled by defa
-Original Message-
From: Martin PelikC!n [mailto:martin.peli...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 8:19 AM
To: dontek
Cc: Misc OpenBSD
Subject: Re: OpenBSD 4.7 as VPN Gateway for Road Warriors, Preferred
Configuration
> Hi
> did you actually read any piece of documentation about the top
-Original Message-
From: Wouter Slegers [mailto:wou...@yourcreativesolutions.nl]
Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2010 5:23 AM
To: dontek
Subject: Re: OpenBSD 4.7 as VPN Gateway for Road Warriors, Preferred
Configuration
>> In my situation with multiple Road Warriors, is one way more correct than
V_ker jai v_koi,
Sar e}wolai ma ]wete ]ma |loqvo tqi^leqo cel\to cak^mg, gqel_a jai v~tisg
stir jaqdi]r jai tir xuw]r sar.
Avieq~ste k_ca deuteq|kepta jai apoka}ste to pam]loqvo jai paqajimgtij|
b_mteo : http://www.akis-angelakis.com/greek/FreeStuff.aspx?Productid=352
Le vikijo}r waiqetislo}r,
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Vijay Sankar wrote:
> Jeremy Evans wrote:
>>
>> After I upgraded to OpenBSD 4.7, my dual head configuration stopped
>> working on my Radeon HD 2600 PRO. This has been working for about a
>> year and a half with no problems since I got the video card.
>>
>> I tried
On Sat, 22 May 2010 22:08:57 +0200 patrick kristensen
wrote:
> Thanks for taking the time to answer and your fast replies.
>
Actually, ppp and TDMA/CDMA are nice break from the other headaches I've
been trying to solve. ;)
First of all, you either haven't mentioned the name of your service
provi
PACK E-MAIL PREMIUM
La Mayor Base de Datos de E-Mails jamas Recopilada
Actualizada al 30 de Septiembre de 2009!!!
Pedidos: (011)(15) 6263-7899
www.elgenuino.zobyhost.com
Transmita su idea, haga conocer su oferta, su negocio o envme su Curriculum a
nada mas y nada menos que a
For the sake of both redundancy and tinkering, I'd like to get a CARP
setup running at home. I have two firewalls yet only one Internet
source. All my local subnets will have statically configured IPs on
both the CARP interface and the underlying interfaces. I briefly tried
to get CARP running on m
39 matches
Mail list logo
