Re: low httpd performance. Apache 2.2 as default? never? *sighs

2010-05-03 Thread Dexter Tomisson
On 3 May 2010 03:31, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO wrote: > >I will print this mail and laugh everyday with it. :) > This is especially for you, Victor. Print that too please, and laugh everyday :): ab -n 1 -c 10 127.0.0.1/1.tar.gz Apache 1.3.29 Requests per second:149.23 [#/sec] (mean) A

Re: Firebird SQL

2010-05-03 Thread Janne Johansson
Every time a configure script fails, you read what actually did fail in the config.log it produces. Every time. 2010/4/30 R0me0 *** > Hello there, > > I4m trying to compile firebird 2.0.5 from source on openbsd 4.4 > > I Have the follow error: > > # ./configure > checking whether make sets $(MAK

Re: low httpd performance. Apache 2.2 as default? never? *sighs

2010-05-03 Thread Tomas Bodzar
Hups # apache2 -v Server version: Apache/2.2.8 (Ubuntu) Server built: Mar 9 2010 20:45:36 Requests per second:125.07 [#/sec] (mean) # apache2 -v Server version: Apache/2.2.11 (Ubuntu) Server built: Nov 13 2009 22:06:57 Requests per second:10108.85 [#/sec] (mean) Are you using your

Re: low httpd performance. Apache 2.2 as default? never? *sighs

2010-05-03 Thread Lars Nooden
On Mon, 3 May 2010, Dexter Tomisson wrote: ab -n 1 -c 10 127.0.0.1/1.tar.gz Apache 1.3.29 Requests per second:149.23 [#/sec] (mean) Apache 2.2.2 Requests per second:375.02 [#/sec] (mean) Apache2 is significantly more complex: ktrace -f /tmp/a2-ktrace.log -di /usr/local/sbin/httpd

Re: low httpd performance. Apache 2.2 as default? never? *sighs

2010-05-03 Thread Jure Pečar
On Mon, 3 May 2010 10:10:01 +0300 Dexter Tomisson wrote: > This is especially for you, Victor. Print that too please, and laugh > everyday :): > > ab -n 1 -c 10 127.0.0.1/1.tar.gz > > Apache 1.3.29 > Requests per second:149.23 [#/sec] (mean) > > Apache 2.2.2 > Requests per second:3

A propos de votre NewsLetter

2010-05-03 Thread Magalie
NewsLetter

Re: No ACPI battery/ac status readings on a ASUS UL30A laptop.

2010-05-03 Thread Torbjørn H . Orskaug
2010/4/29 Torbjxrn H. Orskaug : > 2010/4/29 Peter Hessler : >> what happens if you remove and reinsert the power cord, does it do the >> same thing? >> > > Yep. > Just a quick update on this. I recompiled my kernel with ACPI_DEBUG enabled and I can see that after physically removing and reinsertin

Re: partitions

2010-05-03 Thread Chris Bennett
On 05/02/10 21:20, Matthew Dempsky wrote: On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Chris Bennett wrote: Well, /usr/ports is updated, but never needs to be erased unless really messed up by user error That's true of /usr/src too though, right? Here is a guess: Perhaps this is true for xenocara also

Re: low httpd performance. Apache 2.2 as default? never? *sighs

2010-05-03 Thread Tomas Bodzar
Just for update. OpenSolaris in VM Server Software:Apache/2.2.14 Requests per second:396.00 [#/sec] (mean) Server Software:Apache/1.3.41 Requests per second:1284.49 [#/sec] (mean) Comparing it with previous results from Ubuntu and your results it seems to be very "useful"

Re: low httpd performance. Apache 2.2 as default? never? *sighs

2010-05-03 Thread Jacob Yocom-Piatt
why doesn't openbsd do X? the license is not acceptable | benchmarking tools don't tell the full story | you do not understand the security implications of what you suggest in your case it's all 3 of the above. get a clue and do your homework before you post stupid stuff.

Re: low httpd performance. Apache 2.2 as default? never? *sighs

2010-05-03 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2010-05-03, Dexter Tomisson wrote: > On 3 May 2010 03:31, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO wrote: > >> >I will print this mail and laugh everyday with it. :) >> > > > This is especially for you, Victor. Print that too please, and laugh > everyday :): > > ab -n 1 -c 10 127.0.0.1/1.tar.gz > > Apache

Re: Firebird SQL

2010-05-03 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2010-04-30, R0me0 *** wrote: > Hello there, > > I4m trying to compile firebird 2.0.5 from source on openbsd 4.4 > > I Have the follow error: > > # ./configure > checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes > checking build system type... i386-unknown-openbsd4.4 > checking host system type... i386-

Re: OpenBSD disk scheduler

2010-05-03 Thread Ted Unangst
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 12:09 AM, Luis Useche wrote: > Reading some archives, I found people saying that OpenBSD has no disk > scheduler. My first question is: is this true? If so, what is the reason? Is > it technical or there are no resources for this? OpenBSD has a disk scheduler, of course, bu

Re: low httpd performance. Apache 2.2 as default? never? *sighs

2010-05-03 Thread Kevin Chadwick
With apache 1.3 being simpler I would imagine it has more scope for speed than apache 2. Which is faster, would be interesting but testing has to be thought out well, depending on what you are hoping to prove. ab can be used for some comparison tests but wouldn't reflect performance for live traff

Re: addendum: 4.7 causes different problem Re: spurious "need to frag" messages

2010-05-03 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Wed, 17.03.2010 at 17:48:21 +0100, Toni Mueller wrote: > On Mon, 15.03.2010 at 19:10:12 +0100, Toni Mueller > wrote: > > # pfctl -s a |grep mss > > # ifconfig|grep mtu|grep -v 1500 > > lo0: flags=8049 mtu 33152 > > enc0: flags=41 mtu 1536 > > pflog0: flags=141 mtu 33152 > > # > > > > A

Kernel panic on shutdown -p -- ACPI problem?

2010-05-03 Thread Stefan Unterweger
Hello! I've recently "rediscovered" a computer that I'd been using as a Linux fileserver a few years ago. Since it's hardware is considerably better than the even older machine I'm using now as an OpenBSD fileserver, I tried if I could make it run. In principle, everything works fine, to some ext

56 tipos de listas segmentadas com 7.257.860 e-mails

2010-05-03 Thread Venda MUITO pela Internet
Caso nco esteja visualizando esse e-mail, veja na versco online 56 Tipos de listas diferentes contendo mais de 7.257.860 e-mails. Divulgue os seus produtos e Servigos pela Internet de modo FACIL e ECONTMICO. TODAS AS LISTAS EM ATE 12 X NO CARTAO ! Conhega os nossos produtos e as nossas Promogues

OpenBSD release party Amsterdam

2010-05-03 Thread Floor Terra
May 19 OpenBSD 4.7 will be released, may 20 there will be a release party in Amsterdam. The plan is the same as usual: 18:00 gathering in front of De Deugniet, we will find some food in the neighborhood that has lots of places where we can eat. >From 20:00 on we will gather into De Deugniet itsel

Re: low httpd performance. Apache 2.2 as default? never? *sighs

2010-05-03 Thread VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO
> OpenBSD does more when running each process for security reasons and so > is arguably slower than Linux, but also does less by default and so is > faster than most distros. It's still blisteringly fast, especially where > it counts and if I had to choose one OS to use it would be OpenBSD. > I in

Re: low httpd performance. Apache 2.2 as default? never? *sighs

2010-05-03 Thread Scott McEachern
On 05/02/10 20:31, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO wrote: OpenBSD's stock httpd is very slow and outdated. It is about 6 years old. Almost an abandonware. I will print this mail and laugh everyday with it. :) Ya, me too. It'll sit beside your laughable emails where you argued that the GP

Re: low httpd performance. Apache 2.2 as default? never? *sighs

2010-05-03 Thread Marco Peereboom
wow what a useful comparison. On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 10:04:45PM -0300, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO wrote: > > OpenBSD does more when running each process for security reasons and so > > is arguably slower than Linux, but also does less by default and so is > > faster than most distros. It's still bl

CD's are here

2010-05-03 Thread Denny White
Yes, we have some new cd's, We have some new cd's today, ole! ;) Prior silly exuberance probably has no meaning to the younger generation. Maybe some other old farts like me will recall the song it's a parodying. ;) Complete package arrived unscathed. Even a cool sticker on the outside of the pac