PP4QP0P2QQP2QP9QP5! P P5P=Q P7P>P2QQ PP5QP>P=P8P:P0.
P P>P4P3P>QP>P2P;Q P4P>P:QPQQP0P2P;Q P4P>P3P>P2P>Q, P?QP5QP5P=P7P8Q P8 P8P=Q P5
P4P>P:QPP:P>P=QQP;Q QP8QQQ P?P> P2P>P?QP>QP0P<
P1P8P7P=P5QP0.
P! QP2P0P6P5P=P8P5P<, PP5QP>P=P8P:P0
P.QP8P4P8QP5QP:P8P9 P>QP4P5P;
P
Please forward to the Headteacher or School Office Manager if incorrectly
addressed | If you have trouble reading this email click here
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
APP Assessment Online
Classroom Monitor is a simple, online APP Assessment tool for primary and
secondary schools. E
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=126678113118214&w=2
Has the format of
ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/i386/index.txt
changed again? It seems to be 'ls -l' now.
On 15Mar2010 23:11, J.C. Roberts wrote:
| On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:59:01 +1100 Cameron Simpson
| wrote:
|
| > I have the apparently common problem of CD2 (amd64) from the OpenBSD
| > distro not booting on an IBM x336. And of course there's no floppy
| > and the box won't boot off a USB device at a
* 24 - 26 PPQP>P1P5P=P=P>QQP8 P"PP P PPP P P PP
P PPP#PPP P PPP PP/ P2 QP0PQP>P2,
QQP:P>P2P>P4P8QP5P;P5P9 P8 QP>QQQP4P=P8P:P>P2 QP;QP6P1 PP-P P8
P;P>P3P8QQP8P:P8, QQP8QQP>P2 P:P>PP=P>PP9 P4P5QQP5P;Q P=P>Q
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 11:34:16 +0100 Jan Stary wrote:
> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=126678113118214&w=2
>
> Has the format of
> ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/i386/index.txt
> changed again? It seems to be 'ls -l' now.
>
Hi Jan,
I think this is the second time I've seen you
I get the following messages in /var/log/daemon
Mar 17 07:41:29 b03ls15le inetd[29887]: ident/tcp: bind: Address already
in use
Mar 17 07:51:29 b03ls15le inetd[29887]: ident/tcp6: bind: Address
already in use
it is a -current a week or two old, i386
Should I care about this? What does it mea
On Mar 17 05:16:32, J.C. Roberts wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 11:34:16 +0100 Jan Stary wrote:
>
> > http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=126678113118214&w=2
> >
> > Has the format of
> > ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/i386/index.txt
> > changed again? It seems to be 'ls -l' now.
> >
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:36:25PM -0600, Ted Roby wrote:
> I believe OpenBSD supports up to 16 processors or cores?
That is architecture dependant.
it's 32 on i386 or amd64 (it is just a bit mask). 256 on sparc64 (for
the niagra boxen).
-0-
--
You can measure a programmer's perspective by noti
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 02:18:21PM +0900, Jordi Beltran Creix wrote:
> 2010/3/16 Marc Espie :
...
> > the "C++ is crap, everything that matters should be written in C"
> > mentality.
...
> clang+LLVM is barely able of bootstrapping itself while already
> generating highly optimized code for C and O
Hi,
There's no maintainer listed for anoncvs.nl.openbsd.org, so perhaps
someone can enlighten me as to the correct password to use for anoncvs access
over ssh.
I've tried anonymous, blank, anoncvs . nothing seems to work ?
* Toni Mueller [2010-03-15 12:59]:
> Not using "-R" is not too good, either, as on this particular box,
> reloading everything results in a severance of all existing
> connections.
I don't believe you.
pfctl -f /etc/pf.conf
doesn't do that.
ok, shouldn't, but I don't see where that could break.
* Toni Mueller [2010-03-15 10:52]:
> I've just run into the following problem on a 4.6 box:
>
> /etc/pf.conf (excerpt):
>
>
> table const { 10.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/12, 192.168.0.0/16 }
> block out on $extif from
>
>
> # /sbin/pfctl -F rules -R -f pf.co
* Andreas Gerdd [2010-03-16 17:14]:
> -Why is the stock Apache not getting a version update?
> It is dozens times older than the current 1.3.42 one.
> I know that its a modified-by-openbsd one with bugfixes, and so.
> But such a huge version difference makes me think,
> there might be at least som
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 03:12:50PM +, a b wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There's no maintainer listed for anoncvs.nl.openbsd.org, so perhaps
> someone can enlighten me as to the correct password to use for anoncvs access
> over ssh.
>
> I've tried anonymous, blank, anoncvs . nothing seems to work
cal
Hi,
On Mon, 15.03.2010 at 19:10:12 +0100, Toni Mueller
wrote:
> # pfctl -s a |grep mss
> # ifconfig|grep mtu|grep -v 1500
> lo0: flags=8049 mtu 33152
> enc0: flags=41 mtu 1536
> pflog0: flags=141 mtu 33152
> #
>
> And that's it...
> Sample message from tcpdump:
>
> 19:03:59.805030 1.2.3.4 > 5
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:02:19 +0100 Jan Stary wrote:
> Anyway, what really is the purpose of index.txt being there then?
> To tell the times and sizes?
To break scripts? ;)
To put it bluntly, index.txt seems pointless, or more likely, there is
some super double secret reason for it to still exis
Hi,
I've installed the latest snapshot, with kernel bsd.mp#488, on a
machine that has several IPSEC connections to handle, some fixed
(branch offices), some for road warriors. The setup per se runs well
for several years, but after this upgrade, traffic to the branch
offices stopped. I checked one
Hi,
On Wed, 17.03.2010 at 16:24:42 +0100, Henning Brauer
wrote:
> -A, -O, -R are bullshit and I'll happily remove them. soon.
that's ok with me. I thought that changing the docs was the
less-intrusive thing to do, and I have no experience with ipf, so that
certainly wasn't on my mind.
TIA!
--
Darn, I should write better messages. So here goes an important
addendum:
On Wed, 17.03.2010 at 17:55:34 +0100, Toni Mueller
wrote:
> I've installed the latest snapshot, with kernel bsd.mp#488, on a
> machine that has several IPSEC connections to handle, some fixed
> (branch offices), some for r
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 9:44 AM, J.C. Roberts
wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:02:19 +0100 Jan Stary wrote:
>
>> Anyway, what really is the purpose of index.txt being there then?
>> To tell the times and sizes?
>
> To break scripts? ;)
>
> To put it bluntly, index.txt seems pointless, or more like
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 09:44:50 -0700
"J.C. Roberts" wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:02:19 +0100 Jan Stary wrote:
>
> > Anyway, what really is the purpose of index.txt being there then?
> > To tell the times and sizes?
>
> To break scripts? ;)
>
> To put it bluntly, index.txt seems pointless, or
Toni Mueller wrote:
Darn, I should write better messages. So here goes an important
addendum:
On Wed, 17.03.2010 at 17:55:34 +0100, Toni Mueller
wrote:
I've installed the latest snapshot, with kernel bsd.mp#488, on a
machine that has several IPSEC connections to handle, some fixed
(branch off
Sounds good to me. Thanks Otto !
- Original Message
From: Otto
Moerbeek
To: a b
Cc:
misc@openbsd.org
Sent: Wed, 17 March, 2010 16:06:09
Subject: Re:
anoncvs.nl.openbsd.org password ?
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 03:12:50PM +, a
b wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There's no maintainer listed for ano
On Mar 17 10:14:36, Nick Bender wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 9:44 AM, J.C. Roberts
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:02:19 +0100 Jan Stary wrote:
> >
> >> Anyway, what really is the purpose of index.txt being there then?
> >> To tell the times and sizes?
> >
> > To break scripts? ;)
> >
> >
Help! I'm obviously overlooking something really obvious but I just
can't see it.
I'm building my first PF-based router/firewall using OpenBSD 4.6. For
now, what I
need it to do is pretty simple:
1. Allow all outbound traffic via NAT and allow all inbound responses.
2. Allow only ssh
* Toni Mueller [2010-03-17 18:02]:
> Ideas about how to debug these, are most welcome!
you forgot to read the release notes.
ok, they don't exist yet. so it is current.html instead.
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Ho
Try s/hmac-sha2-256/hmac-sha1/ until you have updated all your firewalls.
Also try seeing http://www.openbsd.org/faq/current.html#20100110 ..
Penned by Toni Mueller on 20100317 17:55.34, we have:
| Hi,
|
| I've installed the latest snapshot, with kernel bsd.mp#488, on a
| machine tha
On 2010-03-17, Jan Stary wrote:
> (It has changed back and forth in the last month.)
I tried using index.txt files for timestamps to monitor the latency
of mirror updates, but had problems with some of them flipping
between formats; I have a suspicion that some site or other
regenerates index.txt
Hello,
I know this is the OpenBSD mailing list, but I'm having an issue with
relayd on FreeBSD and was just hoping to get some direction.
I'm currently using relayd as a load balancer, and it's working fine.
Now I'm trying to add ssl accelration, and that's where I'm having an
issue.
I ca
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:55 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2010-03-17, Jan Stary wrote:
>> (It has changed back and forth in the last month.)
>
> I tried using index.txt files for timestamps to monitor the latency
> of mirror updates, but had problems with some of them flipping
> between form
In doing round-robin on two egress connections on 4.6, I am expecting all
outgoing connections from a single IP to be redirected to the same
redirection address, but this is not what's happening. In the details
below, LAN client 172.16.0.101 is being redirected out both redirection
addresses--with
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:42:26AM -0400, Mike Small wrote:
> I can think of some people who would consider that a great gatekeeper
> for the profession: everyone has to write his or her own compiler
> for all the coding they do.
With enough time on my hands, sure, why not ?
But that's a main issu
On 2010-03-17, Glenn Beadle wrote:
> I know this is the OpenBSD mailing list, but I'm having an issue with
> relayd on FreeBSD and was just hoping to get some direction.
the version in FreeBSD ports dates from December 2007, there have
been many bug fixes and other improvements to relayd since
Hello, I have this PF firewall with two ISPs connected to it and an
internal network. This firewall is balancing the traffic through both
ISPs, and it works great. Now I'm up to the task of making this
firewall react when an ISP goes down and reroute all traffic to the
other one. Both ISPs are unab
> I know this is the OpenBSD mailing list, but I'm having an issue with
> relayd on FreeBSD and was just hoping to get some direction.
Sorry.
From the FAQ, read:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/ftp.html
Regards,
Dani
El 16/03/2010 4:49, Dave Anderson escribis:
I'm configuring a notebook which will use PF to protect itself from the
environments in which I use it, and would like to have FTP 'just work'
on it -- whether it's from an exp
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 13:49:20 +0530
Siju George wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How do I configure OpenBSD PF to be like Nat32 ( http://nat32.com/ )
>
> The Idea is it has two internet connections and the second one should
> pick up if the first goes down and when the first one comes up it
> shoudl be the defau
On Mar 17 21:55:33, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2010-03-17, Jan Stary wrote:
> > (It has changed back and forth in the last month.)
>
> I tried using index.txt files for timestamps to monitor the latency
> of mirror updates, but had problems with some of them flipping
> between formats; I have a
39 matches
Mail list logo
