on 01/07/2010 12:04 AM Adriaan wrote the following:
> 2010/1/6 Thanasis :
>> When we get a message like the following, is there a way to see _what_
>> was in that job?
>>
>> Your "at" job on
>> "/var/cron/atjobs/1262799360.c"
>> produced the following output:
>> /bin/ksh: [3]: no closing quote
>
>
on 01/07/2010 12:27 AM Joachim Schipper wrote the following:
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 11:04:41PM +0100, Adriaan wrote:
>> 2010/1/6 Thanasis :
>>> When we get a message like the following, is there a way to see _what_
>>> was in that job?
>>>
>>> Your "at" job on
>>> "/var/cron/atjobs/1262799360.c
You are invited to "Je sur comptable a la banque BCB je vais virie $6.million a
la etranger".
By your host Ashraf Cotu:
Date: Thursday January 7, 2010
Time: 10:00 am - 11:00 am (GMT +00:00)
Location: cher ami Salut, je suis MONSIEUR. ASHRAF CO
Windows XP, vista, and 7 happily will print to a lpd printer. In the windows
world this is called a port, and, lpd is one of the options.
It's 12 pages of idiot blather, but, you can see the XP setup (or maybe 2000
setup) here:
ftp://ftp.dlink.com/Printserver/dp300U/QIG/DP300U_QIG_100.zip
V
In article ,
jay.kr...@cornell.edu says...
> We use Hudson to manage builds.
> It uses Java.
> It looks like there's nothing viable here for OpenBSD other than x86 and
> AMD64?
> I already have OpenBSD/x86 working.
> I have Linux/ppc, maybe Linux/sparc working.
> There's a "zero assembly" project
In article ,
jay.kr...@cornell.edu says...
> Anyone working on this?
I think the most definitive answer is found at:
http://wikis.sun.com/display/OpenJDK/BSDPort
...and the answer, unfortunately, appears to be "not really".
-Adam
Adam Thompson wrote:
In article ,
jay.kr...@cornell.edu says...
Anyone working on this?
I think the most definitive answer is found at:
http://wikis.sun.com/display/OpenJDK/BSDPort
...and the answer, unfortunately, appears to be "not really".
-Adam
And they thoughtfully include
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 22:13:24 -0800 Gerald Chudyk
wrote:
> > Who'd have thought thirty years ago we'd all be sittin' here
> > alt-tabin' between xterms with a windowmanager of our choice!
> >
> > In them days we was glad to have little rectangular pieces of paper
> > (wet paper!) and would move the
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Jay K wrote:
> We use Hudson to manage builds.
> It uses Java.
> It looks like there's nothing viable here for OpenBSD other than x86 and
> AMD64?
The jdk 1.3 port supported several other CPU architectures, but it's
quite outdated now.
Hi,
could someone give me a hint about what is going on with my broadband
module and fingerprint reader. Thing is that when I'm booting amd64
kernel I have:
ugen0 at uhub3 port 1 "AuthenTec Fingerprint Sensor" rev 2.00/17.03 addr 2
and when I'm booting i386 kernel I have:
ugen0 at uhub0 port
Was it ever indated?
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 10:16:10AM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Jay K wrote:
> > We use Hudson to manage builds.
> > It uses Java.
> > It looks like there's nothing viable here for OpenBSD other than x86 and
> > AMD64?
>
> The jdk 1.3 port supp
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 12:33 AM, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
> A lot of answers eg. here
> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&w=2&r=1&s=developer+laptop&q=b and
> info from this page http://www.openbsd.org/want.html : Laptops. These
> die often enough that our developers need about 2-3 replacements a
> year
Hi There,
We have OpenBSD routers running OpenBGPD at the edge of our network
and behind that we use Juniper Firewalls running JunOS which need to
be patched due to:
http://ptresearch.blogspot.com/2010/01/juniper-junos-remote-kernel-crash-flaw.html
Since we have so many Junipers it will take a wh
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 11:57:58PM +0800, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 12:33 AM, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
> > A lot of answers eg. here
> > http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&w=2&r=1&s=developer+laptop&q=b and
> > info from this page http://www.openbsd.org/want.html : Laptops. These
>
It was removed because it was out of date and didn't contain anything
really useful. Laptops basically work just fine with OpenBSD minus some
moody ones.
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 11:57:58PM +0800, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 12:33 AM, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
> > A lot of answers
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 12:23 PM, James Records
wrote:
>
> It looks like their (Junipers) policy is to only tell customers with
> support contracts what the specific option is that causes this.
Only big customers apparently - Some people had several hours advance
notice, some had several days adv
Justin,
The article doesn't say which option causes this, so its hard to tell, once
you do find this info though, you might be able to do something with the
pf.os file by crafting a custom entry (as far as I can tell this is the only
way to match based on the tcp option field), but I've never mess
In the absence of any feedback, I would say that I have two feature
requests for spamd (Bob, are you out there?):
1) Detect '500 5.5.1 Command unrecognized' loops, and when found,
start to gap response times with an increasing delay.
2) When a client does not wait for spamd's 220 opening
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 7:23 AM, wrote:
> Windows XP, vista, and 7 happily will print to a lpd printer. In the
> windows world this is called a port, and, lpd is one of the options.
>
> It's 12 pages of idiot blather, but, you can see the XP setup (or maybe
2000
> setup) here:
>
> ftp://ftp.dlink
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> It was removed because it was out of date and didn't contain anything
> really useful. Laptops basically work just fine with OpenBSD minus some
> moody ones.
MacBook? MacBook Air? PowerBook? Supported at all?
2010/1/8 Marco Peereboom :
> It was removed because it was out of date and didn't contain anything
> really useful. Laptops basically work just fine with OpenBSD minus some
> moody ones.
My oldish dell 6000 laptop runs just perfect on openbsd. Couple of
years back, suspend wouldn't work on it i t
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Matthias Kilian wrote:
>> MacBook? MacBook Air? PowerBook? Supported at all?
>
> PowerBook? Sure. But I don't see how this is related to i386-laptop.html.
>
Oops. Meant MacBook Pro. Sorry.
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 04:10:34PM -0500, nixlists wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> > It was removed because it was out of date and didn't contain anything
> > really useful. Laptops basically work just fine with OpenBSD minus some
> > moody ones.
>
> MacBook? M
2010/1/7 nixlists :
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Marco Peereboom
wrote:
>> It was removed because it was out of date and didn't contain anything
>> really useful. Laptops basically work just fine with OpenBSD minus some
>> moody ones.
>
> MacBook? MacBook Air? PowerBook? Supported at all?
>
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 07:39:09PM -0200, Christiano Farina Haesbaert wrote:
> 2010/1/7 nixlists :
> > On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Marco Peereboom
> wrote:
> >> It was removed because it was out of date and didn't contain anything
> >> really useful. Laptops basically work just fine with Ope
2010/1/8 Christiano Farina Haesbaert :
[...]
> I sold it and bought a lenovo x61s, couldn't be happier.
I got myself an x61 too. It runs Linux 2.6 though. Wooops! did I just
say Linux? :-)
--
Regards
Ishwor Gurung
Key id:0xa98db35e
Key fingerprint:FBEF 0D69 6DE1 C72B A5A8 35FE 5A9B F3BB 4E5E 17B
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 1:57 AM, Marco Peereboom wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 11:57:58PM +0800, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 12:33 AM, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
>> > A lot of answers eg. here
>> > http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&w=2&r=1&s=developer+laptop&q=b and
>> > info fr
On Jan 7, 2010, at 10:23 AM, James Records wrote:
> Justin,
>
> The article doesn't say which option causes this, so its hard to tell, once
> you do find this info though
It's not like it's that difficult. Did you see the post on ptresearch? Just
test sending the 256 possible packets at a lab m
On Fri, 8 Jan 2010 09:15:44 +0800, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim wrote:
>On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 1:57 AM, Marco Peereboom wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 11:57:58PM +0800, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 12:33 AM, Tomas Bodzar
>>> wrote:
>>> > A lot of answers eg. here
>>> > http://ma
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim wrote:
> thanks. I understand the problem with maintaining a list like that,
> but personally, i prefer a list with a note explaining the situation,
> than no list at all. Some stuff would be laptop-specific as well (as
> opposed to "i386-general").
Escuela Sistimica Argentina presenta:
Clase-Taller
Fobias y Panico.
Supervisisn de casos clmnicos.
==
Miircoles 13 de enero de 18.00 a 19.30 y de 19.30 a 21.00 hs.
--
Two servers I upgraded to 4.6 stable from 4.6 release are now causing
intermittent seg faults. They are running PHP/MySQL (installed from
packages). One on which I did the same upgrade but which runs a mod_perl
project does not appear to be having the same issue. Has anyone seen
this and know if t
Looks like you could block port 22 to all of those devices. Then
perhaps you can allow 22 from one management device and use that as a
hop to get into the Junipers.
Just a thought.
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Justin Credible
wrote:
> Hi There,
>
> We have OpenBSD routers running OpenBGPD
Nevermind. I hadn't read it thoroughly enough.
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 9:07 PM, Bryan Irvine wrote:
> Looks like you could block port 22 to all of those devices. Then
> perhaps you can allow 22 from one management device and use that as a
> hop to get into the Junipers.
>
> Just a thought.
>
>
>
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Devin Ceartas wrote:
> Two servers I upgraded to 4.6 stable from 4.6 release are now causing
> intermittent seg faults. They are running PHP/MySQL (installed from
> packages). One on which I did the same upgrade but which runs a mod_perl
> project does not appear to
In article <20100104163847.gc1...@fuckup.hcl-club.lu>, j...@hcl-club.lu
says...
>
> Hi!
> It happens to me all the time that I want to spawn a new xterm in the
> same directory that I am currently in, for example when I want to open a
> file with vim but keep a shell in the same directory.
>
> x
In article , brandan.row...@cityofthornton.net
says...
> Hi,
> I'm looking for a reliable T1 card to use with 4.6. There's a lot of
> stuff out there indicating Sangoma, but It is not longer supported.
> We're trying to replace a Cisco router with openBSD. The card needs to
> be supported and re
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 04:50:48PM -0500, nixmli...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> MacBook? MacBook Air? PowerBook? Supported at all?
> >
> > PowerBook? Sure. But I don't see how this is related to i386-laptop.html.
> >
>
> Oops. Meant MacBook Pro. Sorry.
Yes, it works.
--
Olivier Cherrier - Symacx.com
38 matches
Mail list logo
