On Jul 27, 2009, at 12:54 PM, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
You can also write a small C program to do that.
I wish I had the knowledge to do this. I think this would be a
valuable addition to the OpenBSD base system. Thanks to both
suggestions. I just copied pcitweak from 4.3 with the libraries b
another option would be to take the pcitweak source code and create a
port/package out of that. Saves the hassle of writing the program.
2009/7/30, Bryan Vyhmeister :
> On Jul 27, 2009, at 12:54 PM, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
>
>> You can also write a small C program to do that.
>
> I wish I had the kn
Hi Claudio and Insan,
Thank you very much for clarified it.
I have another question.
Can I force the core to select only one border router as default and
switch to the other in case it fails?
Is there a point doing so, or I am better the way it is now?
Thank you,
Ivo
Insan Praja SW wrote:
H
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:36:15AM +0300, Ivo Chutkin wrote:
> Hi Claudio and Insan,
>
> Thank you very much for clarified it.
> I have another question.
> Can I force the core to select only one border router as default and
> switch to the other in case it fails?
> Is there a point doing so, or I
On Jul 30 04:19:31, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 07:55:01PM +0200, jean-francois wrote:
> > It's rather an old card.
>
> well, you have an Audigy2 card. the first generation SB Live! cards
> mostly work well. I've tried a few different board models. Audigy
> cards have a known
Hello,
I've just implemented the patch 007 for 4.5, and found out that the .a
libs are chmod 0600, while all other .a libs are chmod 0444. Although
the Makefiles evaluated to this (amongst others):
install -c -o root -g bin -m 600 libperl.a /usr/lib
install -c -o root -g bin -m 600 libperl_pic
Hi,
On Tue, 30.06.2009 at 11:15:21 +0200, u...@o3si.de wrote:
> I try to use an OpenBSD firewall with two ADSL links connected (dynamic
> addresses!) to the internet. Now I want to establish two IPSec tunnels over
> each link to a central VPN gateway (OpenBSD too).
>
> Is it possible to load bal
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 04:12:56PM +0200, frantisek holop wrote:
> hmm, on Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 09:56:29AM -0400, Dan Harnett said that
> > On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 06:06:16AM +0200, frantisek holop wrote:
> > >
> > > amaaq$ sudo fstat /adata
> > > USER CMD PID FD MOUNTINUM
>> it was even async, which makes me curious about the install slowness.
>> Could the card or the exact mount options be the cause of that?
Well, you already noticed the main difference; one is async, the
other uses softdep. That should suggest a simple test you can make;
untarring on a running s
[IMAGE]
Bu e-posta size BultenYonetim.com'dan onaylı olarak gvnderilmiÅtir.
B|ltenYonetim'den e-posta almak istemiyorsanız des...@bultenyonetim.com
'a boÅ bir mail gvnderebilirsiniz.
Rahatsizlik verdigimiz igin vz|r dileriz.
B|lten Yvnetimi bir Netport hizmetidir.
0 Omart Manisaân}n kvkl| m
30.07.09, 13:55, "Marcello Cruz" :
> Dear all,
> Is there a way to use LDAP in a rule to allow or deny based on the user
> instead of the IP Address?
> The idea is to permit the traffic from an inside user to access, for example,
> a VoIP resource on the Internet.
Based on user...
I use for this
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:25:23AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> > I suppose you use an CF-card with about x133 speed. I had the same problem.
> > After using a card with at least x233 speed I didn't have that problem when
> > untaring anymore.
>
> The speed rating by itself isn't very usefu
Thanks a lot, I'll give it a try
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Stefan Wollny wrote:
>> -UrsprC> Von:
>> Gesendet: 30.07.09 01:47:16
>> An: misc@openbsd.org
>> Betreff: Thinkpad x200 wireless hang (5.1 firmware)
>
>
>> Hello,
>> does anyone have problems with wireless?
>> The problem is it connects f
2009/7/29 irix :
> Hello Misc,
>
> This feature is not sheduling pure. At altq You can try to achieve, but altq
is not designed for this (in altq will get all outbound traffic, but we do not
need).
> This whole idea is to avoid queues and do not discard packets, but
> simply ask the party t
> -Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-
> Von:
> Gesendet: 30.07.09 01:47:16
> An: misc@openbsd.org
> Betreff: Thinkpad x200 wireless hang (5.1 firmware)
> Hello,
> does anyone have problems with wireless?
> The problem is it connects fine, but then after a couple of minutes the
> connection hangs a
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Stefan Wollny wrote:
> With OpenBSD 4.4 wpi0 and run0 worked flawless - with 4.5 wireless is a PITA!
> Connectivity drops sometimes after half an hour, sometimes after seconds...
> :-( Restarting the system doesn't really help (after all: it's not Windows so
> this
Hello Misc,
It was a great number of disputes about shaping the incoming flow. This
function is a solution to this dispute,
she realizes that may be implemented according to RFC.
And need it for example if you have a single ftp server and you want it to one
of the ip on it to fill the data did
hmm, on Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 12:20:51PM +0200, Jurjen Oskam said that
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 04:12:56PM +0200, frantisek holop wrote:
>
> > hmm, on Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 09:56:29AM -0400, Dan Harnett said that
> > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 06:06:16AM +0200, frantisek holop wrote:
> > > >
> > >
On Jul 30 14:29:06, Tobias Walkowiak wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:25:23AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >
> > > I suppose you use an CF-card with about x133 speed. I had the same
> > > problem.
> > > After using a card with at least x233 speed I didn't have that problem
> > > when
> >
On Jul 30 11:25:23, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >> it was even async, which makes me curious about the install slowness.
> >> Could the card or the exact mount options be the cause of that?
>
> Well, you already noticed the main difference; one is async, the
> other uses softdep. That should sugges
caso nco visualize correctamente este e-mail, clique aqui
Consulte aqui outros produtos a
PREGOS FANTASTICOS:
Encomende ja online, por telefone ou por e-mail
www.loja21.pt|214 151 490 |ap...@loja21.pt
Morada: Rua Professor Reinaldo dos Santos, N:13, 9:Esq.
1500-5
Hello.
About 4 years ago I installed this combo on an obsd 3.6 box, and it
has worked quite well for me. I really like the obsd way of things.
Now I'm ready to undertake this again, but rather than just blindly
recreate what I had before, I wanted to check how this is handled in
this day
* irix [2009-07-30 17:14]:
> It was a great number of disputes about shaping the incoming flow.
> This function is a solution to this dispute
no, it is no solution, just talk by someone who won't do any work
there anyway. i have not even read it for real, but glancing over
already showed a seriou
Hi Misc,
I have an OpenBSD 4.5 amd64 as a VPN server (OpenVPN) connected to Internet
on em0 through the gateway 192.168.1.1.
VPN Users connect from the outside and get a tun0 interface with an address
on 10.8.0.0/24.
I want VPN users to access Internet through my VPN server, so I have the
proper
--- Chris [Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 12:01:43PM -0400]: ---
> Hello.
>
> About 4 years ago I installed this combo on an obsd 3.6 box, and it has
> worked quite well for me. I really like the obsd way of things. Now I'm
> ready to undertake this again, but rather than just blindly recreate what
> I
2009/7/30 irix :
> Hello Misc,
>
> It was a great number of disputes about shaping the incoming flow. This
function is a solution to this dispute,
> she realizes that may be implemented according to RFC.
Well, sort of. Assuming for a second that this was magically
implemented exactly as you see i
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:06:48AM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
> On Jul 30 04:19:31, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 07:55:01PM +0200, jean-francois wrote:
> > > It's rather an old card.
> >
> > well, you have an Audigy2 card. the first generation SB Live! cards
> > mostly work well.
Robert wrote:
Short followup:
Theo has commited an identical diff to -current.
Looking at the cvs tags for update.c rev 1.7,
this patch applies to 4.6, 4.5, 4.4 and 4.3.
I noticed that there's a patch for 4.4 , 4.5 and 4.6 on the FTP-servers,
but a checkout of the -stable tree still gives me
On 2009-07-30, Jan Stary wrote:
> is 128M, that's why I use xserv45.tgz and not base45.tgz;
> and it should have been tar xzpf I guess - does it make
> a difference? And it shloud be done in single user - but
> the machine is almost idle, really.)
xserv has a small number of large files, whereas
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Maurice Janssen wrote:
> I noticed that there's a patch for 4.4 , 4.5 and 4.6 on the FTP-servers,
but
> a checkout of the -stable tree still gives me the unpatched revision.
> Shouldn't this fix be in CVS with a OPENBSD_4_x tag?
Appears these commits were made a
I need a decent HPPA for hacking on OpenBSD. It would be great if
someone from the community could donate or buy me a J6700 or J6750
(J6750 is better). I live in the greater New York City area. Contact
me off-list for details.
Thanks,
-Kurt
As I understand it, spamdb works by using the fact that a large portion
of spam email is sent only once, so putting a delay by temporarily
rejecting incoming emails from unknown addresses can dump a lot of the
spam with that one rejection. Good email will always go through
eventually. Some spam
> I need a decent HPPA for hacking on OpenBSD. It would be great if
> someone from the community could donate or buy me a J6700 or J6750
> (J6750 is better). I live in the greater New York City area. Contact
> me off-list for details.
Various other models do also work (as you can see on openbsd.or
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 01:42:44PM -0300, Marcello Cruz wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Is there a way to use LDAP in a rule to allow or deny based on the user
> instead of the IP Address?
Okay, I'm going to be literal here...
ypldap to map LDAP to NIS.
Configure the box to allow users to be resolved by
Hi,
I recently installed 4.5 from the CD, and while adding user "amar", I
set the primary group to wheel. But now when I try to do a "su -", I
am kicked out for not being in group wheel. Though FAQ 10.1 says that
one has to be manually added to group wheel if su - is needed, does it
mean that folk
> I recently installed 4.5 from the CD, and while adding user "amar", I
> set the primary group to wheel. But now when I try to do a "su -", I
> am kicked out for not being in group wheel. Though FAQ 10.1 says that
> one has to be manually added to group wheel if su - is needed, does it
> mean that
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Theo de Raadt
wrote:
>> I recently installed 4.5 from the CD, and while adding user "amar", I
>> set the primary group to wheel. But now when I try to do a "su -", I
>> am kicked out for not being in group wheel. Though FAQ 10.1 says that
>> one has to be manually
37 matches
Mail list logo
