Hey,guys:
In NetBSD its have adjustkernel perl script can custom your kernel
configuration file,how about OpenBSD?
I custom my OpenBSD kernel configuration and rebuild it,but in the
dmesg I found
OpenBSD 4.2 (GENERIC) #375: Tue Aug 28 10:38:44 MDT 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/com
Hello. My friend thinks that being a shell provider for IRC bots and
bouncers is very good business. How do I convince him it's not?
Sorry for going off-topic and cross-post, but I don't know who else to ask.
Thanks,
NRS http://nrk.no/p3/program/national_rap_show/
Alright, thanks for the information, that explains a lot.
So there is no easy way to run -current right now?
2008/9/13 Joe Gidi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I got the same(?) problem with the amd64. Or at least the libs is wrong
> > version up or down, not sure which way.
> >
> > I have tried ftp.ope
On 15:37 Sun 14 Sep, Ling Xiaoheng wrote:
> Hey,guys:
>
> In NetBSD its have adjustkernel perl script can custom your kernel
> configuration file,how about OpenBSD?
> I custom my OpenBSD kernel configuration and rebuild it,but in the
> dmesg I found
>
> OpenBSD 4.2 (GENERIC) #375: Tue Aug 28 10:3
Ling Xiaoheng schrieb:
Hey,guys:
In NetBSD its have adjustkernel perl script can custom your kernel
configuration file,how about OpenBSD?
I custom my OpenBSD kernel configuration and rebuild it,but in the
dmesg I found
OpenBSD 4.2 (GENERIC) #375: Tue Aug 28 10:38:44 MDT 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/
On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 03:37:04PM +0800, Ling Xiaoheng wrote:
> Hey,guys:
>
> In NetBSD its have adjustkernel perl script can custom your kernel
> configuration file,how about OpenBSD?
> I custom my OpenBSD kernel configuration and rebuild it,but in the
> dmesg I found
>
> OpenBSD 4.2 (GENERIC)
Hi,
I have network server running on OpenBSD 4.3. Kernel was patched and
recompiled with changed amount of queue for hfsc and cbq to 768.
This machine has 3 interface, two external and one internal.
On each interface i have hfsc queing active. On server i have DHCPD server,
DNS (bind), PF+queing,
On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 9:34 AM, Art Vandelay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello. My friend thinks that being a shell provider for IRC bots and
> bouncers is very good business. How do I convince him it's not?
>
> Sorry for going off-topic and cross-post, but I don't know who else to ask.
>
> Than
On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 02:57:19PM +0200, marcin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have network server running on OpenBSD 4.3. Kernel was patched and
> recompiled with changed amount of queue for hfsc and cbq to 768.
> This machine has 3 interface, two external and one internal.
> On each interface i have hfsc qu
Honestly speaking, I would say its easy money.
Thanks
Subhro
On 9/14/08, Art Vandelay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 9:34 AM, Art Vandelay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hello. My friend thinks that being a shell provider for IRC bots and
>> bouncers is very good business
actually i agree here, running a shell server for 10 USD a head per month,
is a good idea
especially for your freinds who need to learn, just do the math, 100 users
at 10 USD a month and guess what
your making money, though its the getting users to use and abide by good
usage policies is the other
The way I see it, providing the shells is relatively easy, but keeping
your line free of DDoS and other niceties it brings is not worth the
effort, especially if your users use IRC and bitch about every second of
downtime. Suddenly $10 isn't so much, and it's a lot more than the cheap
shell provide
On Saturday 13 September 2008, johan beisser wrote:
> On Sep 13, 2008, at 5:49 AM, steve szmidt wrote:
> > Yes, the US had it for a while but a recent ruling has reversed
> > that.
>
> Really? I never heard of it ever being passed in the first place.
>
> If it's the case I'm thinking of, the key co
On 2008-09-14, J.C. Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the UK, it seems there's such a law.
>
> Page 1: http://networks.silicon.com/mobile/0,39024665,39282266,00.htm
> Page 2:
> http://networks.silicon.com/silicon/networks/mobile/0,39024665,39282266-2,00.htm
>
> "The team cracks low-grade enc
On Sunday 14 September 2008, Ling Xiaoheng wrote:
> Hey,guys:
>
> In NetBSD its have adjustkernel perl script can custom your kernel
> configuration file,how about OpenBSD?
> I custom my OpenBSD kernel configuration and rebuild it,but in the
> dmesg I found
>
> OpenBSD 4.2 (GENERIC) #375: Tue Aug 2
On Sunday 14 September 2008, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2008-09-14, J.C. Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In the UK, it seems there's such a law.
> >
> > Page 1:
> > http://networks.silicon.com/mobile/0,39024665,39282266,00.htm Page
> > 2:
> > http://networks.silicon.com/silicon/networks/mo
Following up to an old post of mine :
It seems the recent(ish, ~2 weeks ago) commits to zyd(4) have fixed
the issue described below. At least, I'm currently downloading the
latest snapshot install.iso and it's working just fine, no more errors
like below. Thanks, Damien !
Cheers,
Paul 'WEiRD' de
I've had the "acpitz0: _AL1[0] not a object ref" problem with my HP
Compaq 6710B too, with -current it seems to be fixed
/Markus
OpenBSD 4.4-current (GENERIC.MP) #29: Sun Sep 14 18:59:41 CEST 2008
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
real mem = 2125410304 (2026MB)
av
On Saturday 13 September 2008, johan beisser wrote:
> On Sep 13, 2008, at 5:49 AM, steve szmidt wrote:
> > Yes, the US had it for a while but a recent ruling has reversed that.
>
> Really? I never heard of it ever being passed in the first place.
>
> If it's the case I'm thinking of, the key couldn
> The GENERIC kernel should be sufficient for most all systems
> and situations.
I think it's his decision. If he'll do drivers patches and even do
new drivers, if he will use custom mk.conf, and maybe even
custom cvs tree why not use custom kernel config too.
By the way if he'll get problems w
On Sunday 14 September 2008 20:16:17 Ivan Arsenyev wrote:
> > The GENERIC kernel should be sufficient for most all systems
> > and situations.
>
> I think it's his decision. If he'll do drivers patches and even do
> new drivers, if he will use custom mk.conf, and maybe even
> custom cvs tree why
Hi all,
I've noticed two interesting (but minor) issues with timekeeping on my
sparc64 machine. First, it doesn't seem to keep time across reboots
and second I've recently seen two large jumps in clock drift.
Of course, the first issue is easily solved with an ntpd -s, but it
seems to me that a c
You have been invited to connect as friends with Chris Weiss
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Please accept or reject this invitation by clicking below:
http://www.bebo.com/in/7794072606a756460097b135
..
Please do not reply directly to this e
Dear List,
In the past 2 days i didn't recieve the daily insecurity output. According
to the maillog the daily script didn't even try to send it. I suspect that
somehow the /etc/security script isn't running. Do you know where should i
look for to solve this problem?
->
Soundoutput Probs
misc
<-- Thread -->
<-- Date -->
Soundoutput Probs
zm0
Sun, 14 Sep 2008 16:08:22 -0700