Jeremy Huiskamp wrote:
>> suexec: disabled; invalid wrapper /usr/sbin/suexec
>
> Did you read suexec(8)?
I expect you mean this?
"Because this program is only used internally by httpd(8),
there are no other ways to directly invoke suexec."
No. I was looking at mod_perl and have
On 1-Sep-08, at 3:17 AM, Lars Noodin wrote:
Jeremy Huiskamp wrote:
suexec: disabled; invalid wrapper /usr/sbin/suexec
Did you read suexec(8)?
I expect you mean this?
"Because this program is only used internally by httpd(8),
there are no other ways to directly invoke suexec.
Jeremy Huiskamp wrote:
> No, I meant this:
> "In order to work correctly, the suexec binary should be owned by
> ``root''
> and have the SETUID execution bit set. OpenBSD currently does not in-
> stall suexec with the SETUID bit set, so a change of file mode is neces-
> sary to enable it..."
Tha
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 10:17:34AM +0300, Lars Nood??n wrote:
> Jeremy Huiskamp wrote:
> >> suexec: disabled; invalid wrapper /usr/sbin/suexec
> >
> > Did you read suexec(8)?
>
> I expect you mean this?
>
> "Because this program is only used internally by httpd(8),
> there are no oth
* Lars Noodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-01 10:05]:
> Jeremy Huiskamp wrote:
>
> > No, I meant this:
> > "In order to work correctly, the suexec binary should be owned by
> > ``root''
> > and have the SETUID execution bit set. OpenBSD currently does not in-
> > stall suexec with the SETUID bit
Afternoon misc,
I recently added an extra loopback interface to an OpenBSD host running
OpenOSPFd as a way of assigning specific IP addresses to the host in a
way that didn't tie them to a specific physical interface.
I'm using the addresses for NAT and also announcing them as a route into
a
jared r r spiegel wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 11:02:18PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
Now someone would like to add a device which (like some other devices
connecting to this machine) is not on a fixed address so it needs to
use the "to any" rule. Though it supports AES in phase 2, only DE
Hi!
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 05:01:20PM -0400, Jeremy Huiskamp wrote:
>Did you read suexec(8)?
Wouldn't one also need to copy over the suexec binary to the chroot for
chrooted httpds, nowadays? That isn't mentioned in the suexec(8) manual
page.
Kind regards,
Hannah.
When can 4.4 be pre-ordered?
Thanks,
Brad
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Pre-Order-4.4-tp19253902p19253902.html
Sent from the openbsd user - misc mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
new_guy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When can 4.4 be pre-ordered?
Wait for the commit message :)
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/
"Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network
On 2008-09-01, Russell Howe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How does ospfd choose the address to send from? I thought it might be
> something to do with the multicast route, but that's set to be on 'lo0',
> whereas my new loopback interface is lo1.
Packets are sent out of interface X with the sourc
On 2008-08-31, Martin Gignac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. Why do pftop and systat report rule #4 as a kind of "pass all" rule
> when it's actually an 'anchor "ftp-proxy/*" all' rule? Is this normal
> and expected?
looks like this isn't implemented yet.
> 2. Is it a bug for systat to report the
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 02:39:07PM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> new_guy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > When can 4.4 be pre-ordered?
>
> Wait for the commit message :)
It's always announced on this mailing list and on undeadly.org as well.
--
Darrin Chandler| Phoenix BSD Us
> When can 4.4 be pre-ordered?
Soon.
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 10:43:26AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
| > When can 4.4 be pre-ordered?
|
| Soon.
\o/
Sleepless nights watching [EMAIL PROTECTED] start now...
Paul 'WEiRD' de Weerd
--
>[<++>-]<+++.>+++[<-->-]<.>+++[<+
+++>-]<.>++[<>-]<+.
Hi,
I'm running openbsd 4.0 (yeh old I know but it's a vital system that
I'm replacing but it processes data that makes a lot of money).
I'm getting these errors in dmesg. Should I be freaked out that the
disk is failing or is it something else? I have tar backups but I want
to make totall
Hi,
I want to load balance an ftp server, so I thought about setting up relayd
in front of it. but due to the nature of the ftp protocol, using separate
connection for control and data, therefore I expect some trouble.
I found some sites, mentioning that ftp will not work with relayd, but
other
Khalid Schofield wrote:
Hi,
I'm running openbsd 4.0 (yeh old I know but it's a vital system that I'm
replacing but it processes data that makes a lot of money).
I'm getting these errors in dmesg. Should I be freaked out that the disk
is failing or is it something else? I have tar backups but
On Sep 1, 2008, at 11:44 AM, Khalid Schofield wrote:
Hi,
I'm running openbsd 4.0 (yeh old I know but it's a vital system that
I'm replacing but it processes data that makes a lot of money).
Better replace the disk tomorrow, then. Or, implement the software on
a new system, and take the hit
The upgrade43 guide does not mention that /etc/ftpusers shouldmust be
changed.
> The upgrade43 guide does not mention that /etc/ftpusers shouldmust be
> changed.
Isn't it indicated here?:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade43.html#etcUpgrade
-Martin
* Paul de Weerd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080901 12:57]:
> On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 10:43:26AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> | > When can 4.4 be pre-ordered?
> |
> | Soon.
>
> \o/
>
> Sleepless nights watching [EMAIL PROTECTED] start now...
>
for the coveted title "First 4.4 CD Set Purchaser". Migh
--- Jim Razmus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Paul de Weerd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080901 12:57]:
> > On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 10:43:26AM -0600, Theo de
> Raadt wrote:
> > | > When can 4.4 be pre-ordered?
> > |
I think that misc@ will be the first in announce the
news.
Please be patient.!
Regards
2.00 GHz cpu with unknown speedstep is reported to have 2200 MHz as
highest speed. Feature or defect? :-) Does this deserve a PR posting or
is it ongoing work?
$ apm -L && sysctl hw.cpuspeed
hw.cpuspeed=1200
$ apm -H && sysctl hw.cpuspeed
hw.cpuspeed=2200
OpenBSD 4.4-current (GENERIC) #1574:
24 matches
Mail list logo
