Re: bgpctl communities bug?

2008-08-31 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 08:24:06PM -0700, Greg Skinner wrote: > Seems like given this RIB entry: > > % ./bgpctl show rib detail 10.0.0.0 > BGP routing table entry for 10.0.0.0/24 > 1.0 > Nexthop 192.168.219.19 (via 192.168.219.19) from test (192.168.0.1) > Origin IGP, metric 0, localpr

Re: odd greyscanner behaviour

2008-08-31 Thread Jose Fragoso
Meanwhile, The reason for the original problem from which this thread was generated is yet to be discussed. Any comments on that would be appreciated. Regards, Jose -- Nothing says Labor Day like 500hp of American muscle Visit OnCars.com today.

Re: dd performance question

2008-08-31 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 10:48:05PM -0700, Neko wrote: > there is no wonder its an "ensteinium dinosaur" > > piece of hardware travels a lot an sometimes ends up in > 486, p1 or p111, i had to backup this biggy in a fly, > and since the kernel was supporting it, but while the bios was > bewildere

Re: pf visualization

2008-08-31 Thread Dave Wilson
Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2008-08-29, Stephan A. Rickauer<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks, I'll have a look into it. Maybe you could send me canacar's diff, so I can test it while I'm on it. I'd definitely prefer pfflowd over softflowd. here you go; it's needed for kernels from after the n

Re: odd greyscanner behaviour

2008-08-31 Thread Ted Unangst
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 1:28 PM, Jose Fragoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Aug 28 12:55:44 wall greytrapper[25604]: Trapped 209.85.132.241: > Mailed from sender gmail.com with no MX or A > > Now, this IP address has an A record and it is from google. > > So my guess is that due to some temporary n

Re: odd greyscanner behaviour

2008-08-31 Thread Jose Fragoso
Hi, > How would it know that dns is down? Ask again and hope it works? > There's no difference between the answers you get for "this domain > doesn't exist" and "the network is broken". I can understand that. It makes a lot of sense now. One thing I could do is to increase the timeout value of

A place for a perl library in the hierarchy

2008-08-31 Thread Lars Noodén
In which directory should applications store their supporting perl libraries? /usr/local/share ? /usr/local/lib ? Specifically, I have a Perl-based CGI script with at least one (perl) library and a number of (perl) supporting scripts to be run daily, etc. If there's an established protocol, I'd

Re: A place for a perl library in the hierarchy

2008-08-31 Thread Johan Beisser
As a rule, anything not in base is installed to /usr/local. Take the time to make sure your library isn't already in ports (or a package) before installing it. I've recently taken to putting my own packages and manually compiled binaries under /opt/local. It's non-standard, but works for me. -jb

suexec: disabled; invalid wrapper /usr/sbin/suexec

2008-08-31 Thread Lars Noodén
Listing the modules in Apache/1.3.29 (4.4-current base, i386 snapshot from 29 Aug) gives a warning regarding suexec. Regards -Lars # httpd -l Compiled-in modules: http_core.c mod_env.c . . . mod_ssl.c suexec: disabled; invalid wrapper /usr/sbin/suexec

Python and PIL (no x11)

2008-08-31 Thread Gold-Pond, Paul E
Hey Folks, I'm in the process of getting a home firewall/webserver up and running. I just installed python from ports with the no_tkinter flavor to get around a requirement for x11. Worked just fine. Installing PIL (py-Imaging) I'm having problems though - it keeps complaining about not having x1

Re: Python and PIL (no x11)

2008-08-31 Thread Fred Crowson
Gold-Pond, Paul E wrote: Hey Folks, I'm in the process of getting a home firewall/webserver up and running. I just installed python from ports with the no_tkinter flavor to get around a requirement for x11. Worked just fine. Installing PIL (py-Imaging) I'm having problems though - it keeps comp

Re: Python and PIL (no x11)

2008-08-31 Thread Fred Crowson
Fred Crowson wrote: Doh wrong reference [1] http://openbsd.org/faq/upgrade42.html#libexpat but xbase does have other libraries

Re: Python and PIL (no x11)

2008-08-31 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2008-08-31, Gold-Pond, Paul E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Installing PIL (py-Imaging) I'm having problems though - it keeps complaining > about not having x11 installed. Is my only option here to install the x11 > filesets? I was hoping to avoid that if I could, but if it's my only option I > g

Re: suexec: disabled; invalid wrapper /usr/sbin/suexec

2008-08-31 Thread Jeremy Huiskamp
On 31-Aug-08, at 3:21 PM, Lars Noodin wrote: Listing the modules in Apache/1.3.29 (4.4-current base, i386 snapshot from 29 Aug) gives a warning regarding suexec. Regards -Lars # httpd -l Compiled-in modules: http_core.c mod_env.c . . . mod_ssl.c suexec: disabled; invalid wrapper /usr/sb

Re: NFS writing, v2 vs v3

2008-08-31 Thread Edd Barrett
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 1:47 PM, Jan Stary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, this is to be expected NFSv3 is faster then v2. NFSv3 can do > READDIRPLUS amnog other things, which NFSv2 cannot. Nobody uses v2 anymore. Does Theo not use amd(8), and therefore NFSv2? amd(8) does not support NFSv3. --