Peter_APIIT wrote:
>
>
> I try it first.
>
>
I have solved the problem by issue this command fsck -y.
Thanks for your help.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/File-System-Corrupted-Due-to-didn%27t-Umount-cause-by-power-failure-tp16323986p16348397.html
Sent from the o
Peter_APIIT wrote:
>
> Hello all expert network administrator, i truly new to openbsd.
>
> I have some dhcp problem.
>
> http://forums.bsdnexus.com/viewtopic.php?id=1858
>
I try it with windows box, it say limited connectivity but Fedora 7 can get
ip address.
Moreover, my wireless cannot up
On Wednesday 26 March 2008 12:08:35 Alexander Hall wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>> It appears that the wireless driver your Thinkpad requires
> >>>
> wpi0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 "Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG"
> >>>
> >>> is not supported in OpenBSD/amd64. See
> >>>
> >>> http://www.o
I asked a perfectly valid question about whether or not that error I'm
getting is due to that function call being GNU only and therefor being
missing from the OpenBSD libc, now can someone answer that?
I do NOT want to to tarnish all OpenBSD users with this brush I used
below with my response to G
Hi all,
I need a RAID-1 (mirroring) for production environment.
?Should I use RAIDFrame or softraid?
The reliability is the main request feature.
--
Thanks,
Jordi Espasa Clofent
Si ce message ne s'affiche pas correctement, vous pouvez le visualiser
en suivant ce lien. [IMAGE]
En vertu de la loi n78-17 du 6 janvier 1978, vous disposez d'un droit
d'acchs et de rectification des donnes vous concernant ainsi qu'un droit
d'opposition que vous pouvez faire valoir tout moment.
Hi,
I'm currently using softraid(4) on my 4.2-stable(*) I386 machine and
yesterday I ran into a problem: after a system freeze (most probably
caused by a malfunctioning onboard SATA controller) softraid found
corrupted metadata on one of my two disks in the RAID1 array I assembled
(sorry, I don't
--- Jacob Meuser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 03:55:20PM -0400, Juan Miscaro wrote:
>
> > Seems like something a lot of people get bitten by. How does one
> stay
> > informed on this snapshot libc/packages synchronization issue?
>
> subscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to see
Juan Miscaro writes:
> --- Jacob Meuser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 03:55:20PM -0400, Juan Miscaro wrote:
>>
>> > Seems like something a lot of people get bitten by. How does one
>> stay
>> > informed on this snapshot libc/packages synchronization issue?
>>
>> subscr
Hello misc,
as I found out the kernel does not use the variable comdefaultrate,
which is set via the BOOTARG_CONSDEV struct passed to the kernel, but
the comconsrate variable while initializing the serial console. This is
initialized to B9600 via , that explains the output I
am seeing. So IMH
Hi all,
I known OpenBSD support Emulex FC HBA card, but can i use multipath I/O ?
sli - Emulex LightPulse Fibre Channel SCSI interface
isp - QLogic based SCSI or Fibre Channel SCSI interface
Thanks
---
Dongsheng
# lspci | grep Fibre
07:00.0 Fibre Channel: Emulex Corporation Zephyr Lig
Ok, managed to get back on the box for a little more troubleshooting!
Interesting part is that there's no traffic on the carp pseudo interface
although the machine certainly knows about it as it responds to the arp. I
tried setting an ip address on the vlan30 interface but there was no change
in t
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 03:16:54PM +0200, Ross Cameron wrote:
> Hi there all,...
>
> I used to maintain a small semi-embedded GNU/Linux system at my
> previous employer and I really enjoyed that.
> But now I'd like to try my had at building a dedicated OSPF/BGP
> route/firewall appliance based on
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 11:49:01AM +0100, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I need a RAID-1 (mirroring) for production environment.
>
> ?Should I use RAIDFrame or softraid?
>
> The reliability is the main request feature.
AFAIK, not all features of softraid are finished yet. However, it
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 2:47 AM, Ross Cameron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 12:20 AM, Girish Venkatachalam
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > It is only because linux kernel is so "modular" (laugh) that people
> want to
> > build their own kernel. And to tell you hones
--- Nick Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Juan Miscaro wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > The online upgrade documentation [1] is fairly vehement about its
> > recommendation regarding the use of the install kernel when
> upgrading.
> > I was wondering why? What dangers await someone going down the
Rafael Morales wrote:
Please someone help me I have deleted my /etc dir (rm
-rf /etc), is there any way to recover it, or there is
a way to recover my data stored in /home ???
restore(8)
Adding misc that somehow fell off...
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 08:51:18AM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> Assuming the drives weren't hurt you can reassemble the RAID 1 with the
> -C force option. Do something along the lines of:
>
> bioctl -c 1 -C force -l /dev/sd2a,/dev/sd3a softraid0
>
> That
On 2008-03-28, Deanna Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Juan Miscaro writes:
>
>> --- Jacob Meuser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 03:55:20PM -0400, Juan Miscaro wrote:
>>>
>>> > Seems like something a lot of people get bitten by. How does one
>>> stay
>>> > informed
Recently I have taken notice in a growing number of articles concerning memory
sniffing threats. Today's post at The Register they talk about the DaisyDukes
memory sniffer. What disturbed me the most was seeing SSH mentioned. Is this
truly a threat if I am running OpenBSD?
http://www.theregist
Recently I have taken notice in a growing number of articles concerning memory
sniffing threats. Today's post at The Register they talk about the DaisyDukes
memory sniffer. Is this truly a threat if I am running OpenBSD?
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/03/28/memory_sniffer_unveiled/
http://cit
Michael Seney wrote:
Recently I have taken notice in a growing number of articles
concerning memory sniffing threats. Today's post at The Register they
talk about the DaisyDukes memory sniffer. Is this truly a threat if I
am running OpenBSD?
Your message at 9:00 wasn't enough, so you sent anoth
At least, disallow hacker to physical touch your OpenBSD box.
You be free of threat.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/OpenBSD-Memory-Sniffer-Protection-tp16365938p16366134.html
Sent from the openbsd user - misc mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thanks. This will help OpenBSD to diagnose the problem.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/amd64--current-kernel-hang-tp16324333p16366188.html
Sent from the openbsd user - misc mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Martin Toft wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 11:49:01AM +0100, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote:
Hi all,
I need a RAID-1 (mirroring) for production environment.
?Should I use RAIDFrame or softraid?
The reliability is the main request feature.
AFAIK, not all features of softraid are finished yet. Ho
25 matches
Mail list logo