Just installed OpenBSD from the latest snapshot. I used the AMD64 arch.
Now the weird thing is that X is terrible slow if I boot with the bsd.mp
kernel. Basic kernel and X work fine together although the X isn't the
fastest as I use vesa driver.
Is there anything to be done to increase respons
Hi again,
I tested HDD with iozone on both linux and OpenBSD, with softdeps, disk
cache between 5 and 50%, and namei augmented ( following tha faq about hdd
performance ) And still get the same poor performance if compared with
linux.
17Mb/s linux, and openbsd 5Mb/s
Any other suggestion?
2007/7
"Damien Bergamini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But the wpi(4) driver should reassociate immediately.
And it does, most of the time. For one reason or another, at
semi-random intervals I get
Jul 23 08:06:49 thingy /bsd: wpi0: fatal firmware error
Jul 23 08:06:50 thingy /bsd: wpi0: timeout wai
On 7/22/07, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2007/07/23 01:01, Jona Joachim wrote:
> I don't know if this applies to you but recent Thinkpads block
> unknown hardware. Only hardware signed by Lenovo is allowed and
> recognized. I think there was a patch to circumvent this for the *4
On 7/22/07, Jona Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, 22 Jul 2007 01:19:05 -0700
"Don Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm running GENERIC.MP with ACPI enabled (20070719 snapshot) on a
> Thinkpad X60. I bought a GIGABYTE GN-WI05GS-RH AirCruiser G
> Mini-PCI-E card from kd85.com to repla
Timo Myyrd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there anything to be done to increase responsiveness with the
> bsd.mp kernel? I'm clueless even what could cause such slowness.
On i386 (well, my ThinkPad R60, Core duo) at least, 'enable acpi'
helps enormously.
That is, after installing, at the boo
Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
Timo Myyrd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Is there anything to be done to increase responsiveness with the
bsd.mp kernel? I'm clueless even what could cause such slowness.
On i386 (well, my ThinkPad R60, Core duo) at least, 'enable acpi'
helps enormously.
Dear all
i have network lite this
pc(b)host(b)---internet-host(a)-pc(a)
i follow tutorial from this link :
http://www.openbsdsupport.org/vpn-ipsec.html
then i try test :
1. Ping from host(b) to host(a) or host(a) to host(b) working ( reply ) .
2. Ping from pc(b) to host (a) repl
sonjaya wrote:
http://www.openbsdsupport.org/vpn-ipsec.html
This is almost 3 years old and there is so many changes, please don't
follow this on 4.1!
I most likely will remove it if we can get an updated version.
Consider this:
http://www.serverwatch.com/tutorials/article.php/3659686
or
sonjaya wrote:
http://www.openbsdsupport.org/vpn-ipsec.html
May be you could also have a look at this nice presentation that show
many changes done on OpenBSD.
You can start here to see some OpenBSD suggestions, but you can look it
all as well as it's nice. (;>
http://openbsd.org/papers/a
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 08:29:04AM +0200, Damien Bergamini wrote:
> | I am using the wpi3945 driver with the latest wpi-firmware
> | (2.4.14). When I am not using my wireless connection for some
> | time, because the laptop is staying switched on and unused for
> | some time, I do get a wireless ti
That is a different problem.
It happens when the wireless button that enables/disables the radio
has not been pushed, or if it is an ACPI-only button or if it's a
software switch that needs some vendor-specific driver to actually
enable the radio.
Damien
> i get another type of timeout in my Thi
Hi!
My new ThinkPad T61 is equipped with a wpi(4) wireless PCI Express
Mini Card...
I'd like to replace it with an Atheros device based on the AR54xx
family of a/b/g (AR5423, AR5424, ...) and a/b/g/n (AR5418, ...)
chipsets, preferrably an original one from IBM/Lenovo. For example,
there is the L
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 12:08:07PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> That is a different problem.
> It happens when the wireless button that enables/disables the radio
> has not been pushed, or if it is an ACPI-only button or if it's a
> software switch that needs some vendor-specific driver to act
thx daniel , i have follow the link and still get ping reply from
pc(a) to pc(b) , below my ipsec.conf and pf.conf
in host(a)
# cat /etc/ipsec.conf
ike esp from 192.168.0.0/24 to 192.168.2.0/24 peer host(b)
ike esp from host(a) to 192.168.2.0/24 peer host(b)
ike esp from host(a) to host(b)
#
# cat
Hi again!
I need to authenticate users in isakmpd by the subject DN of their x509
certificates. For this, I wrote isakmpd.policy as follows:
KeyNote-Version: 2
Authenticator: "POLICY"
Licensees: "DN:/C=CH/O=My Org/CN=My Org's CA Cert Subject"
Conditions: app_domain == "IPsec policy" &&
doi =
Hello list,
In my first attempt with OpenBSD, I tried installing it on an extended
partition because I had no other partition available. The partition
is /dev/hda5 under linux, or according to openbsd fdisk the first partition
after /select/-ing the fourth partition (of type extended DOS).
A
Bonjour,
Nous nous permettons de vous faire parvenir ce courriel afin de vous
prisenter lannuaire de lentreprise.
Annuaire-entreprises.com est un annuaire B to B qui offre un service
simple d'utilisation et efficace pour trouver en quelques clics
l'entreprise qui ripondra au mieux ` vos besoins
Have you tried tcpdumping on the enc0 interface on both gateways to see
what happens on when pinging? tcpdump -n -s 1600 -i enc0
Is there a firewall enabled on the non-responsive end hosts? I've seen
recent versions of Windows block or drop icmp echo requests, maybe some
recent service pack rele
Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
...
So the question is how to properly install and boot OpenBSD on an extended
partition? I couldn't find any relevant documentation anywhere...
Booting from extended partitions is not supported by the OpenBSD boot
system. OpenBSD has to be installed on a primary pa
Edd Barrett wrote:
On 20/07/07, Mark Leisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
% cd /var/yp ; make
Everything builds OK (/var/yp//*.db and /etc/*.db) and I am
not running a slave.
Now as far as I know, yp uses the normal linux/unix passwd format (not
master.passwd). Did you forget pwd_mkd -p /etc/ma
On 23/07/07, Mark Leisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Edd Barrett wrote:
> On 20/07/07, Mark Leisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> % cd /var/yp ; make
>>
>> Everything builds OK (/var/yp//*.db and /etc/*.db) and I am
>> not running a slave.
>
> Now as far as I know, yp uses the normal linux/unix p
Sorry for Out of Topic,
but I don't know where to ask for the meaning of this:
I don't want to urgure with Mr.Siu.
What is the meaning of "urgure"?
Thanks,
Darek
Hello again,
I forgot to mention that I'm not subscribed so please CC: me personally in all
replies.
I know that installation on extended partitions is not officially supported,
that's why I'm asking for "unofficial" information. If I could choose I would
of course had tried installation on
On 23/07/07, Darek Stojek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry for Out of Topic,
but I don't know where to ask for the meaning of this:
I don't want to urgure with Mr.Siu.
What is the meaning of "urgure"?
Hi,
It looks like a typographical error to me.
Or perhaps bad English.
--
~michael
www.bsdq
On Jul 23, 2007, at 8:58 AM, Darek Stojek wrote:
> What is the meaning of "urgure"?
I think that's where you examine the intestines of a sacred chicken
to see what the future portends? No, wait, that's "augure". :-)
--
Jack J. Woehr
Director of Development
Absolute Performance, Inc.
[EMAIL PROT
Hi all
For the archives: isakmpd.policy for authenticating users by their
certificates' subjects (ASN1 DNs):
KeyNote-Version: 2
Authenticator: "POLICY"
Licensees: "DN:/C=CH/O=My Org/CN=My Org's CA Cert Subject"
Conditions: app_domain == "IPsec policy" &&
doi == "ipsec" &&
esp_present =="yes"
On 7/23/07, Darek Stojek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry for Out of Topic,
but I don't know where to ask for the meaning of this:
I don't want to urgure with Mr.Siu.
What is the meaning of "urgure"?
it means somebody can't spell "argue".
Edd Barrett wrote:
Like I said, everything, including /etc/*.db (output of pwd_mkdb),
builds OK. Everything is located in the default directories.
--
Mark Leisher
Maybe thats how it works? Perhaps kill -HUP is required.
ypserv only reloads its ACL file on SIGHUP.
--
Mark Leisher
Otto , i couldn't apply the patch , i get some errors:
patch -p0 < patch1.txt
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--
|Index: setup.c
|===
|RCS file: /cvs/src/sbin/fsck_ff
Friday we added TMOUT=600 to the user's profiles for ksh to
automatically log them out after 10 minutes of inactivity. We started
having processes like sendmail start to freeze, and figured that it was
a software issue as our test machine is running just fine and the only
differences are some m
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 03:02:52PM -0700, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On 6/21/07, andrew fresh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I have several routers that have been running great for many months.
> >(even better since I upgraded to 4.1 on them oround May 4th)
> >
> >OpenBSD 4.1-stable (GENERIC.MP) #0: Fri M
To upgrade to a newer network setup, we kind of need a particular
piece of equipment:
Cisco T1 DSU/CSU WAN Interface Card (WIC-1DSU-T1-V2)
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps221/products_data_sheet09186a00801a9184.html
It has to be the V2 model.
If someone can get one to me, that
On 23/07/07, Mark Leisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ypserv only reloads its ACL file on SIGHUP.
I added a user to my nis domain today, and immediately the user was visible.
all i did was:
adduser
cat /etc/master.passwd | grep [theuser] >> /etc/yp/master.passwd
cat /etc/group | grep [theuser]
I was configuring zones on a fiber channel switch today and
needed the World Wide port Name info. I realized it isn't
printed out when the mpi(4) device is discovered. Digging
into it further I realized it was available at one time
then disabled with this diff
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsw
Greetings,
I'm trying to get a mail server running with spamd. I've read
the relevant man pages, but that's not to say I completely
understand everything perfectly.
I'm actually curious about the expected behavior of spamd and
how effective it is against spam on its own (i.e., without any
addit
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 08:05:45PM -0700, patrick keshishian wrote:
> I'm actually curious about the expected behavior of spamd and
> how effective it is against spam on its own (i.e., without any
> additional SPAM retardants, such as SpamAssassin, etc).
Putting spamd (with greylisting) on some de
On 7/23/07, Darrin Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It seems normal enough. What I and some others have done in addition is
to add a whitelist that bypasses spamd altogether. Into that whitelist
goes gmail (host -ttxt gmail.com) and other large providers using pools
for outgoing mail.
Good p
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 20:51:33 -0700, Darrin Chandler wrote:
>Also, though spamd works GREAT, it is what it is. As I mentioned above,
>it will not stop spam from real mail servers, whether open relays or
>spam house servers. You may get to the point where you do want to add
>ports/packages). I deal
39 matches
Mail list logo
