On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 11:36:24AM +0300, Paul Irofti wrote:
> Since the Hackathon every time I update to the latest snapshots and run
> a pkg_add -iuv I get fatal errors with random package updates.
>
> I usually have to remove by hand (pkg_delete fails) and reinstall the
> given package.
>
> Th
Since the Hackathon every time I update to the latest snapshots and run
a pkg_add -iuv I get fatal errors with random package updates.
I usually have to remove by hand (pkg_delete fails) and reinstall the
given package.
The errors I get are along the lines of:
qt3-mt-3.7p5 (deleting): complete
U
syl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm not sure if I'm at the right place to ask this question, but I
> might aswell try; I'm writing you this mail because there is one thing
> I can't understand in the openbsd kthread.
>
> Actually, it is those two functions from the kthread's m
Hi Ben,
than You for answer. My PostgreSQL instance works fine. The problem is
in OpenBSD unfortunately. PostgreSQL uses COLLATION support served by
operating system and default BSD has C and POSSIX COLLATION. I am looking
for solution for this problem. I need native support for polish lang
Forgot to mention that this repros on two i386 machines and an amd64.
Hi list,
I have successfully set up a client for diskless(8) booting.
However, this works only when booting from the first (onboard) nic.
When i use another nic, the kernel still tries to do revarp from the
first nic, which fails.
sys/nfs/nfs_boot.c offers a possibility to override the default
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 11:08:48AM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 11:36:24AM +0300, Paul Irofti wrote:
> > Since the Hackathon every time I update to the latest snapshots and run
> > a pkg_add -iuv I get fatal errors with random package updates.
> >
> > I usually have to remove
hi!
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 11:50:03AM +0200, Heinrich Rebehn wrote:
> I have successfully set up a client for diskless(8) booting.
> However, this works only when booting from the first (onboard) nic.
> When i use another nic, the kernel still tries to do revarp from the
> first nic, which fails
Hi Philip,
thank You match for answer and nice words :).
I am starting be concern for my problem but my "love" for OpenBSD is
stronger then sort problems (data on my web are sorted not correctly) and I
do not want to change system on may server.
Maybe in the nearest feature OpenBSD Develo
Reyk Floeter wrote:
hi!
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 11:50:03AM +0200, Heinrich Rebehn wrote:
I have successfully set up a client for diskless(8) booting.
However, this works only when booting from the first (onboard) nic.
When i use another nic, the kernel still tries to do revarp from the
first n
Heinrich Rebehn wrote:
> Reyk Floeter wrote:
>> hi!
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 11:50:03AM +0200, Heinrich Rebehn wrote:
>>> I have successfully set up a client for diskless(8) booting.
>>> However, this works only when booting from the first (onboard) nic.
>>> When i use another nic, the kernel
And here are the dmesgs before and after the latest snapshot update.
OpenBSD 4.1-current (GENERIC) #1122: Wed Jun 20 22:10:55 MDT 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC
real mem = 1073016832 (1023MB)
avail mem = 1030762496 (983MB)
mainbus0 at root
bios0 at mainbus0: SMB
> I have successfully ported the relevant material from the NetBSD patches
>
>
> http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/sys/compat/linux/common/linux_misc.c.diff?r1=1.140&r2=1.141
>
>
> http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/sys/compat/linux/common/linux_mmap.h.diff?r1=1.16&r2=1.17
>
> h
OK...
I know I did not give enough information to allow people help.
So here are some more.
The firewall works fine running routed most of the time. It is
running 4.1-STABLE (below is a dmesg).
I see a lot of interrupts on both internal and external interfaces
sk0 and sk1. Something like 3600. T
I hope there are people using/testing/developing rthreads out there who can
explain to me why
syscall getthrid fails with SIGSYS on my system, 4.1-release.
1. I have RTHREADS defined in my kernel. I have checked that the
rthread code is included at compile time, and I also tried this:
$ grep gett
Hello,
Although aware of the general aversion against web gui's on this list
(which I understand) I still would like to be able to allow people to
manage their own zonefile.
Allowing so from within a webpage seems the most logical step for me.
Looking at the many webbased clients outthere I am
At 05:31 PM 6/25/2007 +0200, you wrote:
Hello,
Although aware of the general aversion against web gui's on this list
(which I understand) I still would like to be able to allow people to
manage their own zonefile.
Webmin will do what you wish, .. but it might take some scripting to manage
p
Hello,
I wanted to use xfce for my systems' windows manager, which packages are
must required? (I have install the X base).
thanks!
Alex
Hello,
I see that OpenBSD 3.7 isakmpd and OpenBSD 4.0 isakmpd do not establish
security associations. I get an INVALID-PAYLOAD-TYPE message. isakmpd 3.7 does
not seem to understand payload RESERVED.
Is there a way I can run isakmpd 4.0 downgraded or any other way to get the
two of th
x11/xfce4
On 6/25/07, Alex Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I wanted to use xfce for my systems' windows manager, which packages are
must required? (I have install the X base).
thanks!
Alex
--
almir
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 11:27:11PM -0400, Alex Feldman wrote:
> Hi Andrew
>
> You crash dump doesn't show that it crashed on san driver. I'm saying that
> this is not the problem with san driver but it doesn't show any driver
> related function in crash trace.
I do not see that either. However,
Here are the packages (and their dependencies) that I install
to get a nice Xfce desktop:
xfce-utils
xfce4-session
xfce4-taskbar
xfdesktop
xfwm4
Nick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Alex Kwan
Sent: Mon 6/25/2007 11:26 AM
To: OpenBSD general usage list
Subject: xf
For the archives:
After a lot of head scratching, I discovered that symlinking /var/www
to somewhere else using an absolute path causes problems such as what
I was seeing during install. It is normal since the root location
changes. Use relative symlinks.
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 11:48:14AM -0500, Craig Brozefsky wrote:
> I recently burned two DVDs with my new DVD burner and I am unable to
> mount them on my OpenBSD box using the same burner, tho my Linux
> laptop mounts them. I am running OpenBSD 4.1 amd64. Pleae let me
> know if there is any othe
Yes, I know it's a bad idea, but for reasons beyond my control, I need to
provide a telnet service on an OpeBSD 4.0 machine. Unfortunately there does
not seem to be a telnetd built by default.
How can I get this daemon built?
--
I'm sorry, no one here has any intentions of helping you with anyth
Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
have two machines that are carped and have mysql databases on them.
one machine is the mysql master and the other a slave that replicates
the master. this keeps things ready for what i've just experienced:
mysql master machine goes down. now that a master failure has
o
Hi Misc@,
I was wondering what the general census on port knocking in the OpenBSD
community is. I like the idea of hiding services but I don't like the
idea of relying on a piece of code that's not part of the OpenBSD core.
I know when it comes down to it, it's only hiding ports and not actually
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, stan wrote:
Yes, I know it's a bad idea, but for reasons beyond my control, I need to
provide a telnet service on an OpeBSD 4.0 machine. Unfortunately there does
not seem to be a telnetd built by default.
Yes it was removed and you could've searched the archives:
http://op
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 02:59:58PM -0400, stan wrote:
> Yes, I know it's a bad idea, but for reasons beyond my control, I
> need to provide a telnet service on an OpeBSD 4.0 machine.
> Unfortunately there does not seem to be a telnetd built by
> default.
>
> How can I get this daemon built?
Searc
2007/6/25, John N. Brahy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I was wondering what the general census on port knocking in the OpenBSD
community is. I like the idea of hiding services but I don't
List archives exist.
Best
Martin
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 10:48:20AM -0700, John N. Brahy wrote:
> I know when it comes down to it, it's only hiding ports and not actually
> securing anything.
There, you've hit the nail on the head.
But it's worse. Go find some people using port knocking - you probably
know some. Ask them if they
On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 10:48 -0700, John N. Brahy wrote:
> Hi Misc@,
>
>
>
> I was wondering what the general census on port knocking in the OpenBSD
> community is. I like the idea of hiding services but I don't like the
> idea of relying on a piece of code that's not part of the OpenBSD core.
>
Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You are mounting the wrong device; try /dev/cd0a.
Ah, I tried that earlier, this is what I get.:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/public_html/bbb$ sudo mount -t cd9660 /dev/cd0a /mnt/cdrom
mount_cd9660: /dev/cd0a on /mnt/cdrom: Device not configured
[EMAIL
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 02:31:49PM -0500, Craig Brozefsky wrote:
> Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > You are mounting the wrong device; try /dev/cd0a.
>
> Ah, I tried that earlier, this is what I get.:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/public_html/bbb$ sudo mount -t cd9660 /dev/cd0a
>
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 11:50:10AM +0200, Artur Litwinowicz wrote:
> Hi Philip,
>thank You match for answer and nice words :).
> I am starting be concern for my problem but my "love" for OpenBSD is
> stronger then sort problems (data on my web are sorted not correctly) and I
> do not want to c
Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Start by putting in a disk that really should work - any factory-pressed
> disk. If OpenBSD understands this, it means that the disk drive is not
> completely unsupported or something stupid like that.
Ok, I have read discs with this, tho it took a f
When multiple users with the same source IP want access through the firewall
authpf grants access to the newly authenticating user and kicks off the
previous user. Is there a way to turn off this behaviour so both users
maintain authpf tables?
Works:
1a. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -> authpf -> maintains l
Nope. That's how it is supposed to work.
The point of authpf is for the user to say "this IP
is me" - if that IP could perhaps not be him, well, this
is not an application for authpf. I.E. if your users
are coming in from a NAT, you should rethink what you
are doing.
-Bo
On 6/25/07, Vortechz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I hope there are people using/testing/developing rthreads out there who can
explain to me why
syscall getthrid fails with SIGSYS on my system, 4.1-release.
it looks like you've done everything right. SIGSYS means the kernel
doesn't support the sy
On 6/25/07, Matthew Szudzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have successfully ported the relevant material from the NetBSD patches
thanks, good work.
Bob Beck-2 wrote:
>
> The point of authpf is for the user to say "this IP
> is me" - if that IP could perhaps not be him, well, this
> is not an application for authpf. I.E. if your users
> are coming in from a NAT, you should rethink what you
> are doing.
>
> -Bob
>
I fully unde
> In short, I know the consequences of authenticating multiple users from
> the same IP... is there an easy way to turn off this authpf feature? ;)
You still don't understand.
It's not a feature. It is a requirement.
If you don't like it, then you can't provide any of the functional
parts tha
This is related and may be of interest to some ppl. I have posted some
modifications to the excellent LiveCD instructions by Andreas Bihlmaier to
create a Live USB (if you have a USB key thingie and you want to save space)
http://openbsd-wiki.org/index.php?title=LiveUSB
G
On 6/24/07, Alex Kwan
> I fully understand your reasoning. Under normal circumstances users
> authenticate from their desktop machines (which is a unique IP) and
> therefore not a problem. However, sometimes they are VNC'd into servers
> (more CPU power) and want to access resources behind the internal
> 'firewall'.
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 10:48:20 -0700, John N. Brahy wrote:
>I was wondering what the general census on port knocking in the OpenBSD
>community is. I like the idea of hiding services but I don't like the
>idea of relying on a piece of code that's not part of the OpenBSD core.
>I know when it comes do
Good Day,
My apologies if this question has been asked a million times before. I want to
know if there is a good book out there to learn C++ on UNIX/Linux. I have
browsed Amazon but almost all the books available there are either Windows based
or they have very bad reviews.
I have been doing LAN
Im having some trouble accessing certain sites from my laptop going
through a obsd router doing nat
I have 2 tested configurations
Laptop--->Cisco1721[doing nat]--->internet > msn.com
and
Laptop--->Cisco1721--(gre0)>Openbsd[doing nat]--->internet > msn.com
in the first setup
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, Vortechz wrote:
> I hope there are people using/testing/developing rthreads out there who can
> explain to me why
> syscall getthrid fails with SIGSYS on my system, 4.1-release.
>
> 1. I have RTHREADS defined in my kernel. I have checked that the
> rthread code is included at
48 matches
Mail list logo
