It would be nice if someone could dig up a single DIMM for me.
A Samsung M381L6423ETM-CB0 (512MB PC1200 266MHz 64Mx72 ECC
non-buffered). It's to expand a Cisco 2811 that's involved in moving
openbsd traffic, in case anyone needs to know.
Thanks. Anything within about a week or so should be fine
Also, something else a lot of us urgely need is more CX4 cabling for
10GE driver development and performance testing. We've got a few,
but would like a few more in the 4-5meter range -- in australia,
calgary, germany, and switzerland.
Please help out. It'll improve your net.
Theo de Raadt wrote:
It would be nice if someone could dig up a single DIMM for me.
A Samsung M381L6423ETM-CB0 (512MB PC1200 266MHz 64Mx72 ECC
non-buffered). It's to expand a Cisco 2811 that's involved in moving
openbsd traffic, in case anyone needs to know.
Thanks. Anything within about a we
On 2007/06/18 13:48, Wilson Liu wrote:
> What does problem look like? How can I load isakmpd properly?
What's logged? (/var/log/daemon)
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 09:24:16PM -0400, Arnaud Bergeron wrote:
> I have a problem where I need to know how much traffic has passed on a
> given interface. I don't need it broken down by IPs, protocols or
> whatever of the sort.
>
> After a bit of research I discovered the SIOCGIFDATA ioctl that
some news:
i have installed 4.1-current. if the card is inserted while booting then
the ral0 is recognized and can be used ok, no timeout messages. if i
remove it i get the detached message, but if i reinsert the card then
there is no attaced message and the system freezes without going into d
2007/6/20, Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
yes, reloading the rules makes another copy then switches over. if
you have a really large table, this means having two copies of the
table during the transition.
Thank you for your answer.
I've just tried to set table-entries to 550K, more than do
"Francesco Toscan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've just tried to set table-entries to 550K, more than double the
> content of (210144 entries) but reload always gives:
> /etc/pf.conf.queue:17: cannot define table large_table: Cannot allocate memory
You may be hitting one or more of the severa
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 12:06:37PM +0300, Jussi Peltola wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 06:49:57PM +1000, Craig Hammond wrote:
> > A long long time ago in a very distant galaxy, I am pretty sure I got
> > a Netcomm USB Roadster (AM5055) to work in OpenBSD 3.0 or 3.1 or
> > something.
> I also have
2007/6/21, Peter N. M. Hansteen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
You may be hitting one or more of the several relevant limits, but
have you tried something like 'pfctl -T flush -t tablename' before
reloading the table data?
Yes, if I first flush the table it works flawlessy. The 'problem'
occurs only re
* Raimo Niskanen wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 12:06:37PM +0300, Jussi Peltola wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 06:49:57PM +1000, Craig Hammond wrote:
> > > A long long time ago in a very distant galaxy, I am pretty sure I got
> > > a Netcomm USB Roadster (AM5055) to work in OpenBSD 3.0 or 3.1
* Claudio Jeker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 11:14:29AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 11:43:03PM +, Jon Morby wrote:
> > > I've noticed since updating to current from 4.0-current in January to
> > > -current "now" that certain commands through
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 12:05:27PM +0200, Marc Balmer wrote:
> * Raimo Niskanen wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 12:06:37PM +0300, Jussi Peltola wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 06:49:57PM +1000, Craig Hammond wrote:
> > > > A long long time ago in a very distant galaxy, I am pretty sure I go
* Raimo Niskanen wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 12:05:27PM +0200, Marc Balmer wrote:
> > * Raimo Niskanen wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 12:06:37PM +0300, Jussi Peltola wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 06:49:57PM +1000, Craig Hammond wrote:
> > > > > A long long time ago in a very dis
On 2007/06/21 13:17, Marc Balmer wrote:
> if they give full docs, why not. if they give source code, it has to
> be under an acceptable licens, i.e. BSD or MIT.
blah blah blah blah blah
blah blah blah
Blah!
(as if you didn't guess.. :-)
Hi there,
I walked through these steps to try to follow the stable branch (from
OpenBSD 4.1 -release):
cd /usr
export [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs # (here I used an
existing/real anon cvs)
cvs -d$CVSROOT checkout -rOPENBSD_4_1 -P src # (finished without any error)
cd /usr/src/sys/arch/i386/co
On 6/21/07, Claudio Jeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 09:24:16PM -0400, Arnaud Bergeron wrote:
> I have a problem where I need to know how much traffic has passed on a
> given interface. I don't need it broken down by IPs, protocols or
> whatever of the sort.
>
> After a b
Hello,
> It would be nice if someone could dig up a single DIMM for me.
>
> A Samsung M381L6423ETM-CB0 (512MB PC1200 266MHz 64Mx72 ECC
> non-buffered). It's to expand a Cisco 2811 that's involved in moving
> openbsd traffic, in case anyone needs to know.
>
> Thanks. Anything within about a week
find something else in my own ways.
If anyone can take a try, also look at openbsd.org/want.html to see
if there's any other requests other developers put up recently.
Thanks a lot.
______ NOD32 2342 (20070621) Information __
This message was checked by NOD32 an
Hi,
On 21/06/07, Rivanor P. Soares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Stop in /usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC (line 894 of Makefile).
Is it an i386 machine? Daft question I know, but I've tryed build i386
kernels acidentally many times on my sparc64's.
Make a habbit of sending a dmesg.
--
Bes
Hi,
Other than a hardware problem (interface, switch, cabling, etc.),
What could cause such an error?
I have an OpenBSD 4.1 station configured as a firewall/router,
in which the internal interface has address 200.232.120.1/24
and the external interface has address 200.232.140.3/24.
Even when I t
Index: locate.1
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/locate/locate/locate.1,v
retrieving revision 1.24
diff -u -p -r1.24 locate.1
--- locate.131 May 2007 19:20:12 - 1.24
+++ locate.121 Jun 2007 14:50:03 -
@@ -106,7 +106,
On 6/21/07, Edd Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On 21/06/07, Rivanor P. Soares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stop in /usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC (line 894 of Makefile).
Is it an i386 machine? Daft question I know, but I've tryed build i386
kernels acidentally many times on my s
Hi!
I am first time to install Open BSD, is the OpenBSD files' system same
as FreeBSD?
many thanks!
Alex
On 21/06/07, Alex Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi!
I am first time to install Open BSD, is the OpenBSD files' system same
as FreeBSD?
many thanks!
Short answer: no.
Long answer: From what I learned from mailing lists and knowledgeable
people, they are similiar but they treat critical parts
Alex Kwan wrote:
Hi!
I am first time to install Open BSD, is the OpenBSD files' system same
as FreeBSD?
many thanks!
Alex
man hier
will answer your question.
HTH
Fred
--
http://www.crowsons.com/puters/x41.htm
Alex Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am first time to install Open BSD, is the OpenBSD files' system
> same as FreeBSD? many thanks!
They share a common ancestry and the teams tend to look at the good
bits produced by the others from time to time, so with a bit of luck
it is possible you co
Hi,
I am running OpenBSD 4.1 on a firewall/router.
For some unknown reason (to me), whenever I start the command
nice route monitor
after a little while, I begin to get an enormous quantity of
messages like:
got message of size 104 on ...
RTM_MISS: Lookup failed on this address: len 104, table
On Thursday 21 June 2007 00:36:36 Joe S wrote:
> Ok. So it appears the port I want is in CURRENT ports. Since we're not
> supposed to mix CURRENT ports with a STABLE system (or vice-versa), I have
> to wait for this port to get included in STABLE, which I'm guessing would
> be in 4.2 or build it fr
Here is the full dmesg output.
I couldn't find the exact commands for ddb someone requested on
this list, but I tried trace and ps. If you require specific
commands please let me know and I'll reproduce.
This is still the same machine as the last time.
figured
cpu0 at mainbus0
pci0 at mainbus0
I have several routers that have been running great for many months.
(even better since I upgraded to 4.1 on them oround May 4th)
OpenBSD 4.1-stable (GENERIC.MP) #0: Fri May 4 21:56:51 MST 2007
This morning, one of them went down and nagios paged me. Getting to
work, I just thought it was odd,
> I see "san2: LCP keepalive timeout" output to the console and the below
> in /var/log/messages right around when it locked up but the traces don't
> seem to have anything to do with the network.
>
> Jun 21 06:05:05 rrlhcrtr0200 /bsd: san3: T1 YELLOW ON
> Jun 21 06:05:05 rrlhcrtr0200 /bsd: san3:
On 6/21/07, Jeff Santos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
1. Is this address an IPv6 one? Can I find out who is asking for
it and why?
ugghh, named log? tcpdump?
2. How can I tell named not to deal with IPv6?
an ugly workaround would be to block all ipv6 traffic on named port.
--
almir
On 6/21/07, andrew fresh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have several routers that have been running great for many months.
(even better since I upgraded to 4.1 on them oround May 4th)
OpenBSD 4.1-stable (GENERIC.MP) #0: Fri May 4 21:56:51 MST 2007
This morning, one of them went down and nagios p
Fugulta live-cd (OpenBSD 4.1)
# dmesg
"Intel 82573E AMT" rev 0x03 at pci4 dev 0 function 3 not configured
"Intel 82573E KCS (Active Management)" rev 0x03 at pci4 dev 0 function 4 not
configured
ichiic0 at pci0 dev 31 function 3 "Intel 82801GB SMBus" rev 0x01: irq 10
iic0 at ichiic0
adt0 at iic0 ad
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 03:29:04PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Sangoma has made it pretty clear (by ignoring problem reports
> from our developers) that they don't care at all.
>
> I suggest you call them, and add your voice there.
I certainly will. Unfortunately I think these cards showed up
TD Canada Trust
You have Won $2000 iTunes Gift Card
Wed like to thank you for banking with TD Canada Trust. You have Won
$2000 iTunes Gift Card and You can also win $10,000.00 by using TD Canada
Trust EasySwitch. Every time you make an eligible transaction from your
personal account using TD Can
On 6/21/07, Jeff Santos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
sockaddrs:
2001:503:a83e::2:31
...
My question are:
1. Is this address an IPv6 one? Can I find out who is asking for
it and why?
Yes, it's an IPv6 address. It's almost certainly being asked for by
named in the course of trying to reso
> > 20188 MathKernel CALL mprotect(0xcfbc1000,0x1000,0x107)
> > 20188 MathKernel RET mprotect -1 errno 22 Invalid argument
>
> In OpenBSD, the only legal values for the third argument of mprotect are
> the bitwise sums of
>
> #define PROT_NONE 0x00/* no permissions */
>
Greetings,
I'm trying to configure ftpd(8) to work on my OpenBSD 4.1 firewall
which currently proxies without issue client FTP connections to
outside FTP servers via ftp-proxy(8).
Having read the faq/pf/ftp.html I understand that I need to have two
different instances of ftp-proxy doing the work
I've successfully update my port tr/ee and i've used for this
http://www.openbsd.org/anoncvs.html. I've downloaded and updated current
tree on OpenBSD 4.1. When i trying to install nano 2.0.6 from
/usr/ports/editors/nano && make install then following error displaying.
What did i wrong?
# make ins
I've updated my ports tree to current. And when i trying to install any port
then following error is displaying
Checksum mismatch for . (sha256)
Has anyone faced with this problem? And i also tried to change ports distinfo
files sha256 checksum using HashCalc then ports with no error. What sh
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Erdenebat Guntomor wrote:
I've updated my ports tree to current. And when i trying to install
any port then following error is displaying
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq15.html#NoFun
--
Antoine
43 matches
Mail list logo
