guys symon is capable to monitor each IP address then make a graph for web?
On Saturday 04 March 2006 17:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> guys symon is capable to monitor each IP address then make a graph for web?
No, but there are tools in ports that such as ipaudit and some other tools
(that I cant remember the names of right now) that can do what you need.
---
Lars Han
i'm trying to install ipaudit-web in openbsd 3.8 but their's an error when
i tried to compile. anybody tried to install ipaudit-web in openbsd 3.8?
thanks.
> Here i am again with my new old sun ultra 1 boxes.
>
> When playing with i386 boxes, i used to let a initial 63 sectors for
> the boot procedure. So, i never used my whole disk. For sun, i don't
> know whether i have to let some space or may just go using from sector
> 0.
You can start at secto
Hi,
Actually just 802.11b works for the ath, because of some quirks in the
driver code. Reyk knows about the problem, but it seems not so easy to
fix.
Regards,
Marcus
On Sat, 4 Mar 2006 07:11:21 +0100 Fridtjof Busse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * "Andrew Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Seconde
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 06:14:00PM +0100, oliver simon wrote:
> Still no success ...
>
> On the next firewall, tcpdump only shows the private IP-Address from the
> bsd-machine, trying to connect the outer world ...
>
> 17:51:38.109862 10.50.0.10.47888 > 83.146.78.121.ssh: S
> 3774377327:377437732
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 03:09:17PM -0600, Harry Putnam wrote:
> I'm not sure which way to jump with this question which is a
> reflection of unskilled, inexperienced networking background.
>
> This may not even be the right way to do it.
>
> First: This is all something of a training exercise an
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 07:13:52PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> i'm trying to install ipaudit-web in openbsd 3.8 but their's an error when
> i tried to compile. anybody tried to install ipaudit-web in openbsd 3.8?
pkg_add ipaudit-0.95 works for me. What are you trying to do, and more
importan
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 01:10:29PM +0700, Cahyo wrote:
> On 3/3/06, Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 09:47:35PM +0700, Cahyo wrote:
> > > I wish someone make this
> > > http://www.docum.org/docum.org/faq/cache/65.html for obsd pf n altq,
> > > because very use
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 11:10:22PM -0500, Steve Shockley wrote:
> I'm using relaydb to scan through my mailbox (maildir format) to
> whitelist and blacklist. I do something like this in my Inbox:
>
> for message in $MAILBASE/cur/*
> do
> cat $message | /usr/local/bin/relaydb -vwf /var/spamd/rela
Is there a new default prefix limit in OpenBSD (v3.9)?? I got the
follwoing messages below when trying out the snapshot this weekend, I
don't remembere seeing anything like this in V3.8
Glenn
"Mar 2 20:59:34 www bgpd[238]: neighbor 2001:4830:e2:25::1 (AS30071):
prefix limit reached"
Chris Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Friday 03 March 2006 16:46, Bryan Irvine wrote:
>> Gmail b0rked your ASCII diagram.
>
> Looks fine here when viewed with a fixed font, at least I think it does,
> but I'm not sure what the question is either. I also fail to see the
> logic in sending
"Bryan Irvine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> uh, what did you just say? I don't understand.
>
> What are you trying to do?
>
> why would you need a second name server on your local LAN? The
> netgear can only port forward for one. Are you trying to route
> between the 2 nics on the OBSD mac
Just a quick one...
I did the following to update to patch, and it's been "updating" for over an
hour now and I haven't seen any output. Just want to make sure I did the
right thing...
First I downloaded src.tar.gz and sys.tar.gz and unpacked them in /usr/src
$ cd /usr/src
$ export [EMAIL PROTEC
Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, I am not sure exactly what you are trying to do, but getting 1.1
> to talk to 1.2 might be somewhat interesting. Nothing too bad, but not
> exactly simple either.
I've gone clear around the bend ... over complicating.
So backing off to the rec
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 11:50:58PM +1030, Brendan Grossman wrote:
> Just a quick one...
>
> I did the following to update to patch, and it's been "updating" for over an
> hour now and I haven't seen any output. Just want to make sure I did the
> right thing...
>
> First I downloaded src.tar.gz an
Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's usually better to divide into subnets. /24 is the standard, and
> plenty big enough for any home LAN. This makes routing tables less
> complicated (for instance, the NetGear would need a /32 route entry for
> both 1.1 and 1.2, as would 0.4 and 0.
Hello people,
I boot on bsd.rd, install the sets over ftp and reboot:
Sun Ultra 30 UPA/PCI (UltraSPARC-II 296MHz), Keyboard Present
OpenBoot 3.27, 512 MB memmory installed, Serial #8838654.
Ethernet address 8:0:20:86:dd:fe, Host ID: 8086ddfe.
ok .version
Release 3.27 Version 0 created 2000/08/2
Steve Shockley wrote:
I'm using relaydb to scan through my mailbox (maildir format) to
whitelist and blacklist. I do something like this in my Inbox:
for message in $MAILBASE/cur/*
do
cat $message | /usr/local/bin/relaydb -vwf /var/spamd/relaydb
done
The problem with this is that I keep mess
Hi,
Lets try a install here on a 3.8 system ..
==> Checking files for ipaudit-0.95
>> ipaudit-0.95.tgz doesn't seem to exist on this system.
>> Attempting to fetch /usr/ports/distfiles/ipaudit-0.95.tgz from
>> http://ipaudit.sourceforge.net//download/.
100% |***
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006, Matthew Closson wrote:
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006, Joachim Schipper wrote:
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 10:29:11AM -0500, Matthew Closson wrote:
Rather than have isakmpd bring up all tunnels when the daemon starts up,
is there a way to have it bring up the tunnels on demand? For exa
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 07:37:48AM -0600, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Well, I am not sure exactly what you are trying to do, but getting 1.1
> > to talk to 1.2 might be somewhat interesting. Nothing too bad, but not
> > exactly simple either.
>
> I've
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 07:58:37AM -0600, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > It's usually better to divide into subnets. /24 is the standard, and
> > plenty big enough for any home LAN. This makes routing tables less
> > complicated (for instance, the NetGear
E-motions: Vol. No. 1, Issue No. 22 Brought to you by California News
Tech (OTC BB: CNTE)
By: Tai Nicolopoulos
E-Motions Writer
02/16/2006
Boomerâs Own Attitudes Shape the Way the Market Sees These Aging
Consumers
===
I'll bet you the mirrors are swamped. To see what it is doing try
updating without -q.
Brendan Grossman wrote:
Just a quick one...
I did the following to update to patch, and it's been "updating" for over an
hour now and I haven't seen any output. Just want to make sure I did the
right thing.
OpenBSD 3.8 GENERIC -patch
Can someone confirm or negate if this is a correct possible use of
trunk. I have two 'external' interfaces (em1 & em2) which grab
dynamic IPs from my ISP. I have a single 'internal' interface (em0)
which is bound to my internal network 10.10.50.0/24. I boot, receive
t
> Can someone confirm or negate if this is a correct possible use of
> trunk. I have two 'external' interfaces (em1 & em2) which grab
> dynamic IPs from my ISP. I have a single 'internal' interface (em0)
> which is bound to my internal network 10.10.50.0/24. I boot, receive
> the dynamic IPs on
On 3/4/06, Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Can someone confirm or negate if this is a correct possible use of
> > trunk. I have two 'external' interfaces (em1 & em2) which grab
> > dynamic IPs from my ISP. I have a single 'internal' interface (em0)
> > which is bound to my internal n
On 3/4/06, Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No hack right now. You can go into dhclient and make it not listen
> to the routing socket anymore.
>
What are the implications of doing this on the normal fuctionality of
dhclient on the external interfaces?
Hi, misc.
Whether there is a way restriction of quantity of simultaneous
connections from one ip address, using pf?
--
Sizov A.V. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sizov Alexander wrote:
Hi, misc.
Whether there is a way restriction of quantity of simultaneous
connections from one ip address, using pf?
I would suggest you start by reading the following:
http://openbsd.org/faq/pf/filter.html
And as you are at it. Read the complete PF FAQ, it's very
Sizov Alexander wrote:
Whether there is a way restriction of quantity of simultaneous
connections from one ip address, using pf?
man pf.conf(5) and look for "max-src-conn"
--
Darrin Chandler| Phoenix BSD Users Group
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://bsd.phoenix.az.us/
http://www.
I know this was asked before and not much available, but I keep looking
for one clear DS3 channel cards that would be natively supported in
OpenBSD with decent results to directly replace "M2T-T3+ pa" from Cisco
without additional external CSU/DSU.
It's kind of a quest if you like. I review th
By the way, I should have added that the only one I know of is this one,
for clear DS3:
wanPMC-xT3E3
from:
http://www.sbei.com/index.php/products/wan/wanpmc_xt3e3/
Any feedback on this? Good bad, work, doesn't, reliable, crash, etc...
Not sure how well is work under OpenBSD?
I'm attempting to get a bridging firewall setup going... with
two servers rigged as a fault tolerant pair.
CARP of course won't work in this setup... as I'm not sharing
an IP.
So... I'm using spanning tree protocol.
so... graphically:
Firewall A
Host -- switch <|
On 3/3/06, Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is anybody using 802.11a with ath?
> > The manpage lists a/b/g as working, although g definitly doesn't work
> > for me, only b does. Now I'm curious if anything besides b actually
> > works before I buy an antenna for a.
> > Or is it just my
Hello Gustavo,
On 2006.03.04, at 2:51 AM, Gustavo Rios wrote:
These machine are very old, and hardware documentation has been lost.
It has a serial port, doesn't it?
Sun Ultra 1 Service Manual:
http://www.sun.com/products-n-solutions/hardware/docs/pdf/
802-3819-10.pdf
Sun Ultra 5/10 Serv
Hi list
I want to set the group when mounting msdos partitions in /etc/fstab, but
there doesn't seem to be an option...
In mount_msdos(8) you can use -g, but what are the options to put in
/etc/fstab?
I also want to set the umask.
Running 3.8-stable.
Brendan
38 matches
Mail list logo
