Hi all,
I looked in man 4 ath, man 8 ifconfig and man 8 wicontrol but did find
out the answer to my question:
Is there any tool like wicontrol for ath cards ?
Typically, how can I scan for access points ?
Yours,
Alexandre Stefani
Hello! I'm have problem :( My server is HP DL380 G3.
#uname -a
OpenBSD .econmos.com 3.8 GENERIC#202 i386
#dmesg
OpenBSD 3.8-current (GENERIC) #202: Wed Oct 19 17:52:24 MDT 2005
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.06GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-c
Hi all,
Is ike over tcp supported under isakmpd on obsd 3.7?? where I can
find docs about this configuration ??
Thanks.
--
CL Martinez
carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com
Hi Alexandre,
I don't know of a control tool for ath(4) because all can be done over
ifconfig(8). To scan for access points do simply:
ifconfig -M ath0
I also did a wmdockapp which does a bit monitoring of your wireless card,
which works pretty good with ath(4). That's the port for the latest
From: "Alexandre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi all,
I looked in man 4 ath, man 8 ifconfig and man 8 wicontrol but did find out
the answer to my question:
Is there any tool like wicontrol for ath cards ?
Typically, how can I scan for access points ?
I think this was added post 3.7, but you might b
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 10:24:25AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is ike over tcp supported under isakmpd on obsd 3.7?? where I can
no
> My problem (!!!) - bge1 at pci4 dev 2 function 0 "Broadcom BCM5703X" rev 0x02:
> couldn't establish interrupt at irq 15.
> Howto ? RTFM ? Help me!
Try to set it to a different IRQ in the BIOS.
The whole matter is strange on irq15, which is usually for secondary IDE.
Uwe
Thx! IRQ = 7 all work OK!
- Original Message -
From: "Uwe Dippel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 12:43 PM
Subject: Re: HP DL 380 G3 + OpenBSD 3.8
My problem (!!!) - bge1 at pci4 dev 2 function 0 "Broadcom BCM5703X" rev
0x02:
couldn't establish interrupt at
Hi,
I just wrote this article about migrating to a new HD after the
old one got too flakey.
I maintain the original over here:
http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/documents/hd-migration
HD MIGRATION:
It started with my HD failing to sync when I was rebooting. And
some odd errormessages I saw. So I w
Hello!
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 12:42:04PM +0200, Han Boetes wrote:
>I just wrote this article about migrating to a new HD after the
>old one got too flakey.
>[...]
I like a dump | restore combo, because dump is quite fast.
I.e. partition the new disk similar to the old one (sizes may vary as
lo
On 10/26/05, Chris Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Running 3.8, 2 nics, 1 statically assigned, and the other using dhcp.
> Problem is that resolv.conf is always overwritten. Using
> resolv.conf.tail doesn't help as the information is just tacked on at
> the end of the dhcp supplied in
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 12:42:04PM +0200, Han Boetes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just wrote this article about migrating to a new HD after the
> old one got too flakey.
>
> I maintain the original over here:
>
> http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/documents/hd-migration
>
>
> HD MIGRATION:
>
> It started wit
Hannah Schroeter wrote:
> I like a dump | restore combo, because dump is quite fast.
Sounds interesting, I'll look into it.
> I.e. partition the new disk similar to the old one (sizes may
> vary as long as stuff will fit on the new disk). dump|restore
> for every filesystem (partition) you have,
James,
The more I think about this one, the more I think there is no
solution to your issue. Well okay there are two choices, either use
spamd or not. :)
You would have to have ESP to know from which IP address a particular
sender would be sending. If I'm sitting in a hotel and using th
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 20:57:15 -0500
James Harless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What I'm looking for is a way to whitelist them based on user
> input.. before their initial email has been sent. In this somewhat typical
> scenario, the user has contacted me and said "I don't want mail from
> [EMAIL P
Hi,
I tried installing nmap and got some dependency problems. I am running
snapshots.
pkg_add
ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/i386/nmap-3.93.tgz
Can't install
ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/i386/nmap-3.93.tgz:
lib not found pcap.3.1
Even by looking
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
> Rico
> Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 8:55 AM
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: Problem installing nmap from packages
>
> Hi,
>
> I tried installing nmap and got some dependency problems. I am runni
Rico [Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 02:55:02PM +0200] wrote:
>I tried installing nmap and got some dependency problems. I am running
>snapshots.
>
>pkg_add
>ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/i386/nmap-3.93.tgz
>Can't install
>ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/i386/nma
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 02:55:02PM +0200, Rico wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried installing nmap and got some dependency problems. I am running
> snapshots.
>
> pkg_add
> ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/i386/nmap-3.93.tgz
> Can't install
> ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots
Chad,
I appreciate the insight. I do realize it's a difficult problem but,
I think that there's a solution (albeit possibly from someone smarter
than I).
I do have variables that are known (the sender email address and the
recipient email address). The problem is tying them to the IP Address
of
Hi,
slightly OT, I created Frappr! openbsd map
(http://www.frappr.com/openbsd). Join it and well, we could see who
and where does use OpenBSD.
Regards
Petr R.
--
"Security is decided by quality" -- Theo de Raadt
On Wed 2005.10.26 at 14:55 +0200, Rico wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried installing nmap and got some dependency problems. I am running
> snapshots.
>
> pkg_add
> ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/i386/nmap-3.93.tgz
> Can't install
> ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/package
On 10/26/05, lEBEDEW aNDREJ gERMANOWI^ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My problem (!!!) - bge1 at pci4 dev 2 function 0 "Broadcom BCM5703X" rev 0x02:
> couldn't establish interrupt at irq 15.
> Howto ? RTFM ? Help me!
In the Compaq BIOS, make sure nothing is configured for IRQ 15. It's
an annoying i
--On 26 October 2005 08:21 -0500, James Harless wrote:
I do have variables that are known (the sender email address and the
recipient email address). The problem is tying them to the IP Address
of the MTA when it's seen @ spamd. It may be that there isn't a
solution without direct modification
Thanks all! The problem is solved by recustomizing IRQ in BIOS.
# dmesg | grep bge1
bge1 at pci4 dev 2 function 0 "Broadcom BCM5703X" rev 0x02, BCM5703 A2
(0x1002): irq 7 address 00:0e:7f:ad:0e:e3
brgphy1 at bge1 phy 1: BCM5703 10/100/1000baseT PHY, rev. 2
bge1: flags=8843 mtu 1500
lladdr
I'm looking at buying a ECS A900 or A901 laptop and i'm curious if
anyone has any experience running OpenBSD on such a machine?
Tech specs, for those interested:
http://www.ecsusa.com/products/a900_spec.html
http://www.ecsusa.com/products/a901_spec.html
---
Lars Hansson
Message from: Lars Hansso
At 09:57 PM 10/25/05, James Harless wrote:
I appreciate the suggestions, but, not quite what I'm looking for yet.
Either of these would allow me to whitelist someone AFTER they had been
greylisting. What I'm looking for is a way to whitelist them based on user
input.. before their initial email
On Wednesday 26 October 2005 07:38 am, Siju George wrote:
> Now My /etc/dhclient.conf looks like this
These two lines worked fine here:
---
request subnet-mask, broadcast-address, routers;
supersede domain-name-servers "192.168.107.2";
--
On 10/26/05, Frank Bax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> At 09:57 PM 10/25/05, James Harless wrote:
>
> >I appreciate the suggestions, but, not quite what I'm looking for yet.
> >Either of these would allow me to whitelist someone AFTER they had been
> >greylisting. What I'm looking for is a way to wh
If you are using spamlogd correctly, so that it is whitelisting the
destination addresses of target mailservers, I find the actual need
for this to be near zero, since most people send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and as soon as they do the server is whitelisted for
the reply - this is not the
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 09:06:11 -0600, Bob Beck proclaimed...
> Basically, the correct answer is "suck it up princess, in
> pathological cases someone's email might be delayed by a short while
> getting to you" in normal cases it won't. Usually users ask for this
> when you tell them what you
> My experience is that greylisting requires at least 2 failed attempts.
> Maybe my pf.conf isn't setup properly. But, there's always 1 'extra' failure
> that seems to me should pass through.
James is right, it's a design flaw of spamd that two failed attempts
are required. This is what happens:
On 10/26/05, James Harless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chad,
>
> I appreciate the insight. I do realize it's a difficult problem but,
> I think that there's a solution (albeit possibly from someone smarter
> than I).
Nope there's just not.
> I do have variables that are known (the sender email
I wanted to set up a system which has two ether cards (it's part of
a transparent bridge so it'll be inline with someone's connection)
such that it'll pick up a DHCP address on *both* cards ... the trick
comes from not knowing in advance whether the DHCP server will be
on the inside connection or t
Hi
I'm running a 3.7 (all patches applied, everthing else default) on an
old box (dmesg at the end). It fetches mail for me with the following
script:
---8<---
#! /bin/sh
LOCK="$HOME/.getmail.lock"
if ! [ -f $LOCK ]
then
touch $LOCK
getmail 2>&1 > /dev/null
rm $LOCK
fi
-
On Oct 26, 2005, at 11:54 AM, Graham Toal wrote:
My experience is that greylisting requires at least 2 failed
attempts.
Maybe my pf.conf isn't setup properly. But, there's always 1
'extra' failure
that seems to me should pass through.
James is right, it's a design flaw of spamd that two
> How would you find an unknown ip of an unknown machine? About the
> only *chance* you have is doing MX lookup's and hoping that email
> comes from that same server. If their organization uses various
> relays and proxies to send, you are out of luck. There's no way to
> get that information wi
Graham Toal wrote:
The only fix for this is a *major* redesign of spamd (or equivalently
incorporating spamd's greylisting code into a spamfilter which *does*
relay connections at the IP level to an MTA - which is actually what I'm
working on at the moment)
Why start from scratch ? There are e
I didn't see any specifics in the archives or from Google. As this
type of software tuner can be had for cheap (locally here I've found
the Asus TV FM tuner PCI card for under $40cdn), I was wondering if
OpenBSD had support for it?
Many thanks in advance!
--
I know too much and yet not enough
FYI, Hakan tells me this isn't possible now, but might be someday.
Sean Knox wrote:
[I didn't get much response on the openbsd-ipsec list, so I'm reposting
here]
I'm having problems allowing roadwarrior connections from aggressive and
main mode clients to connect isakmpd at the same time.
--On 26 October 2005 09:12 -0400, Frank Bax wrote:
Have you tried whitelisting these servers:
http://greylisting.org/whitelisting.shtml
That list by policy only includes 'shared queue' servers on blocks
larger than /24 (the greylisting software written by the list compiler
usually m
On 10/26/05, Graham Toal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I wanted to set up a system which has two ether cards (it's part of
> a transparent bridge so it'll be inline with someone's connection)
> such that it'll pick up a DHCP address on *both* cards ... the trick
> comes from not knowing in advance
I have been reading through the archives but have not found a reliable answer
yet. I have recently been converting vpns from manual to isakmpd, with one
of the other endpoints being a Cisco box. I can bring up a single subnet/IP
no problem but if I try to add another phase2 connection it fails.
At 11:05 AM 10/26/05, James Harless wrote:
On 10/26/05, Frank Bax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> spamd only delays the *first* message between the two parties. After that
> there is no delay - as long as sender continues to use the same SMTP
> server.
My experience is that greylisting requires a
Stuart Henderson wrote:
--On 26 October 2005 08:21 -0500, James Harless wrote:
I do have variables that are known (the sender email address and the
recipient email address). The problem is tying them to the IP Address
of the MTA when it's seen @ spamd. It may be that there isn't a
solution w
Graham,
I use a bridge and assign the IP to one NIC, albeit statically assigned,
on several "production" OpenBSD 3.5 systems. If I ever switched the IP to
the Other NIC, I would lose connectivity until the ARP tables on the
various LAN hosts updated with the new MAC address. Maybe about 10 minu
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm running a 3.7 (all patches applied, everthing else default) on an
> old box (dmesg at the end). It fetches mail for me with the following
> script:
>
> ---8<---
> #! /bin/sh
>
> LOCK="$HOME/.getmail.lock"
>
> if ! [ -f $LOCK ]
> then
>
Requires fingers to be functional :)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Roy Morris
> Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 2:41 PM
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: isakmpd - Single Phase 1 - Multiple Phase 2 Address
>
>
> I have been re
> I use a bridge and assign the IP to one NIC, albeit statically assigned,
> on several "production" OpenBSD 3.5 systems. If I ever switched the IP to
> the Other NIC, I would lose connectivity until the ARP tables on the
> various LAN hosts updated with the new MAC address. Maybe about 10 minut
> Maybe I'm not understanding the problem, but for a tranparent bridge, you
> wouldn't want it to be assigned an IP address on either network card. hence
> the "transparent" part.
You would think so, but you would be wrong. As I was when I started
this project. In OpenBSD a bridge must either ha
On 10/26/05, Lars Hansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm looking at buying a ECS A900 or A901 laptop and i'm curious if
> anyone has any experience running OpenBSD on such a machine?
i have an A900, but unfortunately, due to some critical apps that i
have on that thing, am not able to convert it
> >The only fix for this is a *major* redesign of spamd (or equivalently
> >incorporating spamd's greylisting code into a spamfilter which *does*
> >relay connections at the IP level to an MTA - which is actually what I'm
> >working on at the moment)
> Why start from scratch ? There are enough sea
> On 10/26/05, James Harless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Chad,
> >
> > I appreciate the insight. I do realize it's a difficult problem but,
> > I think that there's a solution (albeit possibly from someone smarter
> > than I).
>
> Nope there's just not.
There is, but not with spamd as currentl
On 10/26/05, Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Oct 2005, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
> > GNU gdb 6.3
> > [...]
> > This GDB was configured as "i386-unknown-openbsd3.7"...
> > Core was generated by `sh'.
> > Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
> > #0 0x1c027ed6 in _we
> It *ought* to be possible to configure both hostname.xl0 and hostname.fxp1
> as dhcp, and whichever one comes up first, will then bridge through the
> DHCP server for the other. Unfortunately it just happens by luck of
> alphabetical order, that the one which comes up first is *not* looking
> at
A while back, I had problems installing OpenBSD on Proliants. I'd get all the
way through the installation process and reboot the computer, and the BIOS
wouldn't boot OpenBSD from the first the RAID1 hard disk. Playing with
disklabel and using other commands to copy the MBR didn't work. If I b
> Assuming that the problem turns out to be that the dhcp request for
> fxp1 is always routed out of fxp1 (makes sense, right?) what can I do
> to have it routed out the other interface via bridging? (Remembering
> that the solution has to work symmetrically, if in some other deployment
> it is th
Why not start the system with one interface down (so you know which way
to route to) then "up" it at the end of the boot sequence and start the
dhclient?
Graham Toal wrote:
Assuming that the problem turns out to be that the dhcp request for
fxp1 is always routed out of fxp1 (makes sense, righ
2005/8/30, Alexander von Gernler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> just resumed my work on i386-laptop.html after vacation, and I noticed
> we don't have any reports on the IBM/Lenovo Thinkpad X41.
>
> Does anyone out there have this machine running under OpenBSD?
> Please report.
Hi all,
It's not an X41, b
Jonas Carlsson wrote:
In what ways will I suffer if I simply re-enable null mounts to bring
some discspace from /home into my apache chroot on a much smaller /var
partition? I've used this solution without problems for a few versions.
Maybe you won't suffer at all, maybe you get corrupted file
> From: Kevin Frand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Why not start the system with one interface down (so you know which way
> to route to) then "up" it at the end of the boot sequence and start the
> dhclient?
Because DHCP isn't a routable protocol, so knowing that
information doesn't help. (Although y
Han Boetes wrote:
It started with my HD failing to sync when I was rebooting. And
some odd errormessages I saw. So I was holding my breath hoping
for it to be something else or just an incident.
DejC!-vC9. You are describing my laptop with its crappy Hitachi hard drive.
But it only got
worse.
Graham Toal wrote:
I could force the traffic from one interface to the other with pf
and a route-to option, but only if I know which interface the dhcp
server is connected to. Since I cannot make that assumption (it
depends on where in the network the bridge is inserted) I can't see
a solution.
anyone have any luck getting apps running under linux emulation that
don't check whether they can play at a certain sampling rates to play
properly on hardware like auich(4) stuck on 48kHz?
I've tried running the redhat esound libs against the native daemon with
no luck (sound doesn't play).
R
Making, drinking tea and reading an opus magnum from James Wright:
[Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> anyone have any luck getting apps running under linux emulation that
> don't check whether they can play at a certain sampling rates to play
> properly on hardware like aui
Robert,
If I remember correctly, bridging only works in hostap mode.
Rgds,
Anwar Puthu
___
Sent with SnapperMail
www.snappermail.com
.. Original Message ...
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 12:36:04 +0200 "Robert Stepanek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Hi list,
>
>When setting up a wireless bridge to
> If I remember correctly, bridging only works in hostap mode.
Bingo, someone remembered -- and that is correct.
In the other modes, MAC addresses of course do not get exposed
correctly, and your access point cannot impersonate the other
hosts it is required to.
It is fairly obvious if you think
...a while back, i wrote a tutorial for RAIFRame RAID1 as a root FS on
NetBSD. I used the "bootstrap" method. Sometime not soon after, NetBSD
added RAIDFrame to the INSTALL* kernels and presumably menus to sysinst,
mitigating the need for this approach.
the boostrap process is:
*) do a basi
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:42:43 -0500, Graham Toal wrote:
> What I expected was that the first would sleep for a
> short time then ask again, and get it OK. I haven't seen that happen -
> about 30 minutes later and the interface still has no IP.
[This goes vastly OT, I know:]
I am blank astonished
Oct 26 2005 c. 20:42 Graham Toal wrote:
> I wanted to set up a system which has two ether cards (it's part of
> a transparent bridge so it'll be inline with someone's connection)
> such that it'll pick up a DHCP address on *both* cards ... the
> trick comes from not knowing in advance whether the D
> > What I expected was that the first would sleep for a
> > short time then ask again, and get it OK. I haven't seen that happen -
> > about 30 minutes later and the interface still has no IP.
>
> [This goes vastly OT, I know:]
>
> I am blank astonished that it seems to be impossible to get two
>
there is a diff from gordon klok in the snapshots that should improve
support for k7 and k8 family powernow (cool and quiet). i'd like to
know where/if it works, what messages get printed, and if hw.setperf
does anything useful. md5 -t with setperf=0 and 100 would be nice.
Graham Toal([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on 2005.10.26 23:52:28 +:
> They're not both connected to a DHCP server. The DHCP server is
> only connected to one of the NICs. Nevertheless I want both NICs
> to get an IP from that DHCP server. I thought I could do it because
> they were bridged NICs. I was
73 matches
Mail list logo
