* Owain Ainsworth [2009-07-14 18:33]:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 04:19:28PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
> > * Owain Ainsworth [2009-07-14 16:12]:
> > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 03:23:09PM +0200, Nido wrote:
> > > > According to the xclock man page, under options, at '-render', it
> > > > claims us
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 04:19:28PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Owain Ainsworth [2009-07-14 16:12]:
> > On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 03:23:09PM +0200, Nido wrote:
> > > According to the xclock man page, under options, at '-render', it
> > > claims using Xrender is default when xclock is compiled wi
> if memory serves we changed the default locally tho.
I have checked the xclock behaviour on Fedora 11; and it works as
described in the manpage. Also, the code in the freedesktop.org git
repository matches with Owain's patch. Thus it seems the OpenBSD X
code was changed indeed. I will refrain fr
* Owain Ainsworth [2009-07-14 16:12]:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 03:23:09PM +0200, Nido wrote:
> > According to the xclock man page, under options, at '-render', it
> > claims using Xrender is default when xclock is compiled with Xrender
> > support.
> >
> > However; running xclock without argumen
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 03:23:09PM +0200, Nido wrote:
> According to the xclock man page, under options, at '-render', it
> claims using Xrender is default when xclock is compiled with Xrender
> support.
>
> However; running xclock without arguments looks the same as when ran
> with the -norender
According to the xclock man page, under options, at '-render', it
claims using Xrender is default when xclock is compiled with Xrender
support.
However; running xclock without arguments looks the same as when ran
with the -norender option. Running xclock with the -render gives
smooth clock hands,
6 matches
Mail list logo
