On Thursday 12 April 2007 18:28, Niall O'Higgins wrote:
> Interesting, I have always found the radio in ural(4) (and rum(4) which
> is next-generation chip) to be excellent. Much better than ral(4) and
> even wi(4) in my experience.
Better than Senao/Engenius wi(4)?
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 09:37:31AM +0200, Wijnand Wiersma wrote:
> 2007/4/12, Darrin Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 02:18:28AM +0200, Maxime DERCHE wrote:
> >> A recent thread (04/04/2007) on this list showed that the ralink
> >> chipsets are well supported by OpenBSD.
> >
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 10:04:44 +0200
Claudio Jeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm a big fan of acx(4) as AP. acx(4) has an excellent radio chip compared
> to ral(4) PCI card I used before. There are some high power wi(4) that
> make also very nice access points (11b only but strong signal).
Do yo
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 02:15:45AM +0100, pedro la peu wrote:
> > The usual recommendation is ral(4)
>
> Or acx(4), ath(4), rtw(4), rum(4), wi(4).
>
rtw(4) seems to have some issues with hostap. At least it did not send out
beacons. jsg@ may know more (I don't have such a card to play).
I'm a b
2007/4/12, Darrin Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 02:18:28AM +0200, Maxime DERCHE wrote:
> A recent thread (04/04/2007) on this list showed that the ralink
> chipsets are well supported by OpenBSD.
If I recall, there was also talk about lower signal strength with
ralink. Fo
- Original message -
Or acx(4), ath(4), rtw(4), rum(4), wi(4).
I thought we shouldn't support ath?
On 4/11/07, pedro la peu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The usual recommendation is ral(4)
Or acx(4), ath(4), rtw(4), rum(4), wi(4).
My advice would be ral(4) I have also used ath(4) however the G mode
does not work real well, I would suspect that ral(4) would be one of
the first devices to support 80.211n. in OpenBSD (Someone correct me
if I am wrong on this)
Sam Fourman Jr.
On 4/11/07, Darrin Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The usual recommendation is ral(4)
Or acx(4), ath(4), rtw(4), rum(4), wi(4).
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 02:18:28AM +0200, Maxime DERCHE wrote:
> A recent thread (04/04/2007) on this list showed that the ralink
> chipsets are well supported by OpenBSD.
If I recall, there was also talk about lower signal strength with
ralink. For an access point this is important, but could be
A recent thread (04/04/2007) on this list showed that the ralink
chipsets are well supported by OpenBSD.
I think any wireless card with a ralink chipset will do the job.
See http://openbsd.org/i386.html#hardware ("Wireless Ethernet Adapters")
if you need more information.
Maxime
Peter wrote:
> I
On 4/11/07, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm looking to build on OpenBSD 4.0 (4.1?) a wireless access point for a small
network. I would like to hear what cards have proven to be the most
effective in this arena. I am very interested in small form factor machines
with possible onboard wirel
I'm looking to build on OpenBSD 4.0 (4.1?) a wireless access point for a small
network. I would like to hear what cards have proven to be the most
effective in this arena. I am very interested in small form factor machines
with possible onboard wireless adapters. The client systems will be ru
12 matches
Mail list logo
