On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 09:39:56AM +0200, Paul Irofti wrote:
> I'll send a new dmesg and notify if anything has changed when I get
> back.
Got back, it was the graphics card not the mobo, but I did ask him to
test my NIC too and he said it ran just fine (of course I asked for a
specific duplex tes
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 09:59:49PM -0500, Nick Holland wrote:
> First of all, regarding your dmesg: that's a feature, not a bug. The
> system attempts to store multiple dmesgs in RAM and keep them after a
> reboot. This can be very handy at times, but disconcerting to those
> not expecting it. T
Paul Irofti wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 11:00:07PM +0200, Paul Irofti wrote:
>> Strange, the dmesg I submitted (and the one dmesg shows:) both point to
>> my configuration before the snapshot update. But the login informs me
>> that I'm running ``OpenBSD 4.1-beta (GENERIC) #847'' and uname say
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 11:00:07PM +0200, Paul Irofti wrote:
> Strange, the dmesg I submitted (and the one dmesg shows:) both point to
> my configuration before the snapshot update. But the login informs me
> that I'm running ``OpenBSD 4.1-beta (GENERIC) #847'' and uname says the
> same:
>
> $ una
I've received a new mobo with a vr(4) NIC. Ever since I installed it I'm
getting very slow transfer speeds (i.e. from 7-8 mb/s to 0.3-0.4 mb/s).
I've googled and stfa and found some complaints on the freebsd mailing
lists but wasn't able to find a solution. Is this a known bug? Should I
just buy an
Strange, the dmesg I submitted (and the one dmesg shows:) both point to
my configuration before the snapshot update. But the login informs me
that I'm running ``OpenBSD 4.1-beta (GENERIC) #847'' and uname says the
same:
$ uname -rsv
OpenBSD 4.1 GENERIC#847
6 matches
Mail list logo
