Re: vio(4) tap(4) question

2017-08-28 Thread Mike Larkin
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 09:35:52PM -0400, Bryan Harris wrote: > Somehow this thread gave me the idea to try: > > pass on { vether* tap* } > > Which did not work. But it lead to the idea to use the group names: > > pass on { vether tap } > > Which does work. It's funny because I like using gro

Re: vio(4) tap(4) question

2017-08-28 Thread Bryan Harris
Hi Trond, We must have been typing at the same time, yes that ended up working. I tried a * character first but that didn't work (and wasn't in the man page anyway). V/r, Bryan On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 9:32 PM, trondd wrote: > On Mon, August 28, 2017 6:03 pm, Bryan Harris wrote: >> >> pass on {

Re: vio(4) tap(4) question

2017-08-28 Thread Bryan Harris
Somehow this thread gave me the idea to try: pass on { vether* tap* } Which did not work. But it lead to the idea to use the group names: pass on { vether tap } Which does work. It's funny because I like using group names (like egress) and I noticed earlier today that all taps are in a group

Re: vio(4) tap(4) question

2017-08-28 Thread trondd
On Mon, August 28, 2017 6:03 pm, Bryan Harris wrote: > > pass on { vether0 tap0 tap1 tap2 tap3 tap4 tap5 tap6 tap7 tap8 tap9 } > > Thanks all. > > V/r, > Bryan > Can't you just use the interface group 'tap'? pass on { vether0 tap }

Re: vio(4) tap(4) question

2017-08-28 Thread Mike Larkin
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 06:48:20PM -0400, Bryan Harris wrote: > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 6:18 PM, Mike Larkin wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 06:03:16PM -0400, Bryan Harris wrote: > > >> If the vio is connected to the virtual switch, and the switch is > > > > But the vio(4) interface isn't visi

Re: vio(4) tap(4) question

2017-08-28 Thread Bryan Harris
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 6:18 PM, Mike Larkin wrote: > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 06:03:16PM -0400, Bryan Harris wrote: >> If the vio is connected to the virtual switch, and the switch is > > But the vio(4) interface isn't visible to the host. So what you said there > doesn't make sense. It's connect

Re: vio(4) tap(4) question

2017-08-28 Thread Mike Larkin
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 06:03:16PM -0400, Bryan Harris wrote: > Hi folks, > > I am in the learning process about vmd. When I read the vmctl(8) man > page I have incorrectly got the idea that I can have a VM that has a > vio interface but without a mapping to a host tap interface, simply by > omit

vio(4) tap(4) question

2017-08-28 Thread Bryan Harris
Hi folks, I am in the learning process about vmd. When I read the vmctl(8) man page I have incorrectly got the idea that I can have a VM that has a vio interface but without a mapping to a host tap interface, simply by omitting the -i option from the "vmctl start vmX" command. However, if I read