On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Mattieu Baptiste wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:58 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011, Mattieu Baptiste wrote:
>>
>>> After digging around this problem with help from Pedro, I noticed that
>>> a 4.9-release kernel works ok, whereas a 5.0-beta does
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:58 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011, Mattieu Baptiste wrote:
>
>> After digging around this problem with help from Pedro, I noticed that
>> a 4.9-release kernel works ok, whereas a 5.0-beta does not. So I tried
>> to identify which commit was responsible and
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011, Mattieu Baptiste wrote:
> After digging around this problem with help from Pedro, I noticed that
> a 4.9-release kernel works ok, whereas a 5.0-beta does not. So I tried
> to identify which commit was responsible and found out this one is
> responsible of *very* slow writes w
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Mattieu Baptiste
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It's really weird. I see very slow writes when softdep is enabled.
> Write caches seem to be enabled on disks. Utilities like bonnie++
> confirm that writes are very slow with softdep enabled (although it
> helps with lots of f
Hi all,
It's really weird. I see very slow writes when softdep is enabled.
Write caches seem to be enabled on disks. Utilities like bonnie++
confirm that writes are very slow with softdep enabled (although it
helps with lots of file creations). This happens whether I use native
disks or RAID 1 vol
5 matches
Mail list logo
