Re: usage of pf overload table option inside anchors

I was missing the anchor argument in pf when listing tables. Thank you for your insight, Pedro Caetano On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 6:16 AM, Jan Kalkus wrote: > > > On Nov 9, 2016, at 10:37 PM, Jan Kalkus wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> How does one use the overload state option inside an anchor? > >

Re: usage of pf overload table option inside anchors

> On Nov 9, 2016, at 10:37 PM, Jan Kalkus wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> How does one use the overload state option inside an anchor? >> >> I'm running -current (7th november snapshot) 64bit, sample pf >> configurations follow with two different configuration attempts. >> Both print the following warning:

Re: usage of pf overload table option inside anchors

> Hi, > > How does one use the overload state option inside an anchor? > > I'm running -current (7th november snapshot) 64bit, sample pf > configurations follow with two different configuration attempts. > Both print the following warning: > > pfctl: warning: namespace collision with global table.

usage of pf overload table option inside anchors

Hi, How does one use the overload state option inside an anchor? I'm running -current (7th november snapshot) 64bit, sample pf configurations follow with two different configuration attempts. Both print the following warning: pfctl: warning: namespace collision with global table. sample pf co