Kernelpanic: Re: upl(4) interface not working

2006-03-02 Thread Lars Weste
Hi, i had an other ethernet interface configured and the default route via the other interface. I removed this hostname.if and restarted. then i did the following: # ifconfig upl0 inet 10.200.200.1 10.200.200.2 netmask 255.255.255.252 up # route add default 10.200.200.2 # ping 10.200.200.1 PING

Re: upl(4) interface not working

2006-03-01 Thread Lars Weste
Hi all, >On Wednesday 01 March 2006 21:09, Lars Weste wrote: >> I configured it on the first machine: >> ifconfig upl0 inet 10.200.200.1 10.200.200.2 netmask 255.255.255.255 up > >Wrong netmask. point-to-point links usually use 255.255.255.252 (a /30). I tried with different netmasks, /30, /31,

Re: upl(4) interface not working

2006-03-01 Thread Lars Hansson
On Wednesday 01 March 2006 21:09, Lars Weste wrote: > I configured it on the first machine: > ifconfig upl0 inet 10.200.200.1 10.200.200.2 netmask 255.255.255.255 up Wrong netmask. point-to-point links usually use 255.255.255.252 (a /30). --- Lars Hansson

Re: upl(4) interface not working

2006-03-01 Thread Lars Weste
Hi Sebastian, Henning, > --- Urspr|ngliche Nachricht --- > Von: Sebastian Schmitzdorff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > An: misc@openbsd.org > Kopie: Lars Weste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Betreff: Re: upl(4) interface not working > Datum: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 15:15:07 +0100 > > I

Re: upl(4) interface not working

2006-03-01 Thread Sebastian Schmitzdorff
I'm not much of an network expert but wouldn't it help to use a /31 (255.255.255.254) instead of a /32 (255.255.255.255) mask? sebastian

upl(4) interface not working

2006-03-01 Thread Lars Weste
Hi list, first I was happy to find this upl(4) device. after connecting it to the usb port, the device shows up as: upl0 at uhub0 port 2 upl0: Prolific Technology Inc. PL2302 Host-Host Interface, rev 1.00/0.01, addr 2 I configured it on the first machine: ifconfig upl0 inet 10.200.200.1 10.200