On 8/7/07, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2007/08/07 15:46, Austin Murphy wrote:
> > If I made a new file with a just the new rules and loaded it with
> > something like "pfctl -f two.pf.rules.conf", would all the existing
> > filter rules be dropped and would only the two new rul
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 18:31:53 -0500, Mike Piety wrote:
>On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 15:46:41 -0400
>"Austin Murphy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I inherited a "transparent" bridging firewall running
>> OpenBSD 3.8 and pf. I would like to add two new filter
>> rules without disrupting the current network
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 15:46:41 -0400
"Austin Murphy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I inherited a "transparent" bridging firewall running
> OpenBSD 3.8 and pf. I would like to add two new filter
> rules without disrupting the current network traffic. The
> pfctl man page did not seem to indicate a w
On 2007/08/07 15:46, Austin Murphy wrote:
> If I made a new file with a just the new rules and loaded it with
> something like "pfctl -f two.pf.rules.conf", would all the existing
> filter rules be dropped and would only the two new rules be in effect?
Yes.
> Let's say I updated the existing conf
I inherited a "transparent" bridging firewall running OpenBSD 3.8 and
pf. I would like to add two new filter rules without disrupting the
current network traffic. The pfctl man page did not seem to indicate
a way to load a single filter rule to a running configuration.
If I made a new file with
5 matches
Mail list logo
