Re: trunk failover without failing back to master port

2008-02-25 Thread Vijay Sankar
On February 25, 2008 04:08:24 pm Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2008-02-25, Vijay Sankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks very much for your reply. The Cisco switches have STP enabled but > > not RSTP. Basically it looks like when a switch comes back on line, it > > takes close to 30s before the

Re: trunk failover without failing back to master port

2008-02-25 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2008-02-25, Vijay Sankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks very much for your reply. The Cisco switches have STP enabled but not > RSTP. Basically it looks like when a switch comes back on line, it takes > close to 30s before the port is active (meaning orange light turning to green > for t

Re: trunk failover without failing back to master port

2008-02-25 Thread Vijay Sankar
On February 25, 2008 01:46:04 pm Richard Daemon wrote: > On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 9:33 AM, Vijay Sankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Good day, > > > > I have two interfaces -- nfe0 on switch0 and nfe1 on switch1 are part of > > trunk0. Trunk failover from nfe0 to nfe1 works very well. No proble

Re: trunk failover without failing back to master port

2008-02-25 Thread Richard Daemon
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 9:33 AM, Vijay Sankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Good day, > > I have two interfaces -- nfe0 on switch0 and nfe1 on switch1 are part of > trunk0. Trunk failover from nfe0 to nfe1 works very well. No problems if > switch 0 goes offline -- traffic goes through switch1 fl

trunk failover without failing back to master port

2008-02-24 Thread Vijay Sankar
Good day, I have two interfaces -- nfe0 on switch0 and nfe1 on switch1 are part of trunk0. Trunk failover from nfe0 to nfe1 works very well. No problems if switch 0 goes offline -- traffic goes through switch1 flawlessly. Once switch0 comes back online, traffic is disrupted for about 30 second