Re: trivial smtpd scheduler diff

On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 07:32:38PM +0100, percy piper wrote: > I'd say twice per message processed is unnecessarily verbose but I > assume you want it that way for a reason. > ok that's too verbose indeed. > It is a trivial niggle and probably irritates only me :-) > no i can understand, i us

Re: trivial smtpd scheduler diff

I'd say twice per message processed is unnecessarily verbose but I assume you want it that way for a reason. It is a trivial niggle and probably irritates only me :-) Thanks for looking Gilles. Percy. On 17 July 2012 19:04, Gilles Chehade wrote: > mh, is it really that verbose ?

Re: trivial smtpd scheduler diff

mh, is it really that verbose ? Gilles On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 06:54:41PM +0100, percy piper wrote: > Any objections to making the scheduler a little less verbose? > > Cheers, > Percy. > > Index: scheduler.c > === > RCS file: /cvs

trivial smtpd scheduler diff

Any objections to making the scheduler a little less verbose? Cheers, Percy. Index: scheduler.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/smtpd/scheduler.c,v retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -p -r1.6 scheduler.c --- scheduler.c 10 Jul 2012 11:1