Howdy,
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 09:12:42AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> That said, this is not enough reason to entirely delete the code. It
> still has uses.
It's useful for checking ports are not dumping junk all over the
file-system. Please keep it.
Best Regards
Edd Barrett
(Freelance softw
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 8:23 AM, Jonathan Schleifer
wrote:
> It was removed when I reported a bug in NETBSD-5-0 that would crash
> the Kernel when you tried to use systrace. Instead of fixing that,
> they removed it.
Looks like you will have to run OpenBSD then. For my personal use, I
find syst
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Theo de Raadt
> wrote:
>
> > real; systrace does have the ability to "grant root" unless you build
>
> Should that read "does not"?
>
> > the policy specifically to do such a stupid thing (actually, I am not
Oh, indeed. Sorry. systrace cannot grant root u
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> real; systrace does have the ability to "grant root" unless you build
Should that read "does not"?
> the policy specifically to do such a stupid thing (actually, I am not
-g
Am 26.03.2009 um 16:12 schrieb Theo de Raadt:
> They freaked out and did the wrong thing.
It was removed when I reported a bug in NETBSD-5-0 that would crash
the Kernel when you tried to use systrace. Instead of fixing that,
they removed it.
> systrace has a small problem. It is a very diff
> > I guess you should take a look at Systrace:
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systrace
>
>
> This was removed from NetBSD some time ago because it is vulnerable.
> They said it's not only possible to circumvent it, but also gain root
> using it. Is this fixed in OpenBSD somehow?
They frea
Am 26.03.2009 um 07:17 schrieb Tobias Weisserth:
> I guess you should take a look at Systrace:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systrace
This was removed from NetBSD some time ago because it is vulnerable.
They said it's not only possible to circumvent it, but also gain root
using it. Is this
7 matches
Mail list logo
