On Thu, 8 Sep 2005 20:10:48 -0300
Gustavo Rios <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 0) Very high process overhead, i.e., each pair
> requires 2 other process for monitoring, and
Considering how small these processes are it's not a real problem on
any even remotely modern hardware.
> 1) djb license: i be
On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Gustavo Rios wrote:
Ok, i see! What, then, should i address more?
There is no guarantee that 3rd party code will be included in OpenBSD.
Frankly, the odds are against importing random software into base unless
it is quite wonderful, but getting software in to ports is som
Ok, i see! What, then, should i address more?
Thanks once more.
2005/9/8, Damien Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Gustavo Rios wrote:
>
> > By using BSD license, would i be able to confidently consider my tools
> > to be included wihtin OBSD?
>
> this is a necessary but by no m
On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Gustavo Rios wrote:
By using BSD license, would i be able to confidently consider my tools
to be included wihtin OBSD?
this is a necessary but by no means sufficient quality.
Hey folks,
i am using obsd for a shell server access. For monitoring daemons, i
use DJB daemontools. What i dislike about it, is:
0) Very high process overhead, i.e., each pair
requires 2 other process for monitoring, and
1) djb license: i believe the old abd good BSD one.
So, i decided to came
5 matches
Mail list logo
