Re: spamd - good job!

2007-04-20 Thread Bob Beck
Yes, the upgrading to 4.1 page mentions this. -Bob * Frank Bax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-20 12:43]: > Is there a place that documents the spamd differences from 4.0 to 4.1; or > am I left with detecting the differences in documentation? I see 41.htm > mentions greylist sync

Re: spamd - good job!

2007-04-20 Thread Curt Micol
This will set you in the right direction: http://www.undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20070301144846 On 4/20/07, Frank Bax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is there a place that documents the spamd differences from 4.0 to 4.1; or am I left with detecting the differences in documentation? I see 41.

Re: spamd - good job!

2007-04-20 Thread Frank Bax
Is there a place that documents the spamd differences from 4.0 to 4.1; or am I left with detecting the differences in documentation? I see 41.htm mentions greylist sync which I won't need (although I could see a one-time use when migrating boxes); greytrapping sounds interesting, might try that

Re: spamd - good job!

2007-04-20 Thread Bob Beck
Thanks. 4.1 has some major changes too, so bear in mind spamd wise it's a big change from 4.0 -Bob * Frank Bax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-20 08:29]: > I'm finally upgrading from 3.5 to 4.0! I use the whitelist from puremagic > and in the past 2.5 years I have also added anoth

spamd - good job!

2007-04-20 Thread Frank Bax
I'm finally upgrading from 3.5 to 4.0! I use the whitelist from puremagic and in the past 2.5 years I have also added another 10 ip addresses to spamd whitelist because of problems with mail getting through. This week I did tests on 3 of those ip addresses and we are 3/3 for current spamd acc