On 5/20/06, Chad M Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I worked with a customer once that had a software based load
balancing solution. I liked the way it worked. While I was working
on the box if I was going to take the service down for maintenance I
could tell the local agent and the box was r
On May 21, 2006, at 11:25 AM, Joachim Schipper wrote:
There are various proxies, talking either a specific protocol. Most
should either be able to do failover or be able to be re-configured
for
a new host very quickly.
A bit of scripting might glue this all together. Was there a specific
ap
On May 21, 2006, at 10:18 AM, Morten Liebach wrote:
On 2006-05-20 20:48:13 -0400, Chad M Stewart wrote:
I worked with a customer once that had a software based load
balancing solution. I liked the way it worked. While I was working
on the box if I was going to take the service down for mainte
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 08:48:13PM -0400, Chad M Stewart wrote:
> I worked with a customer once that had a software based load
> balancing solution. I liked the way it worked. While I was working
> on the box if I was going to take the service down for maintenance I
> could tell the local a
On 2006-05-20 20:48:13 -0400, Chad M Stewart wrote:
> I worked with a customer once that had a software based load
> balancing solution. I liked the way it worked. While I was working
> on the box if I was going to take the service down for maintenance I
> could tell the local agent and the
I worked with a customer once that had a software based load
balancing solution. I liked the way it worked. While I was working
on the box if I was going to take the service down for maintenance I
could tell the local agent and the box was removed from the pool of
servers.
Anyone know o
6 matches
Mail list logo
