On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 06:45:18AM +0200, Patrik Lundin wrote:
>
> I am currently testing this patch, I will report back once I have
> some results.
>
So have have tried to stress test the patch, and while it seems to
superficially work it doesnt really seem stable.
I have written a rather silly
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 04:51:34PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
>
> Indeed, I think maybe this is ok.
>
> Index: ffs_vfsops.c
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.136
> diff -u -p -r1.136 ffs_vfs
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 20:54, Alexander Hall wrote:
> I do the 'mount -uw / do_stuff / mount -ur' dance as part of my backup
> system in order to minimize fsck time and disk corruption in case of
> unexpected power outages etc. I don't have softdep on those, but that's
> not really the point.
>
On 05/28/13 19:54, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 19:37, Patrik Lundin wrote:
However, once I update it to read-only again the softdep flag is
removed:
# mount -ur /usr/src
/dev/sd0i on /usr/src type ffs (local, nodev, nosuid, read-only)
The softdep flag is cleared when you change
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 01:54:50PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
>
> The softdep flag is cleared when you change a mount to read only. What
> would a read only softdep filesystem do?
>
I was only surprised that updating a filesystem to read-only and back to
read/write would result in another state th
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 19:37, Patrik Lundin wrote:
>
> However, once I update it to read-only again the softdep flag is
> removed:
> # mount -ur /usr/src
> /dev/sd0i on /usr/src type ffs (local, nodev, nosuid, read-only)
The softdep flag is cleared when you change a mount to read only. What
woul
Hello,
I have a simple fileserver that performs a nightly backup to an extra
disk mounted at /backup using rsync with --link-dest.
The backup disk is normally mounted read-only except when rsync is
running.
A few days ago i figured it would be interesting to enable softdeps on
the backup disk to
7 matches
Mail list logo
