On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 01:40:29PM -0500, Jose Fragoso wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Looking at the diff between dmesg running GENERIC kernel and dmesg running
> .MP kernel, I noticed the line below:
>
> ioapic0: pin 16 shares different IPL interrupts (40..50), degraded
> performance
>
> in the .MP dmesg. Co
>> can i see a dmesg as well? if you're running the machine as an
>> amd64, can you try it again as an i386?
I am running as an i386
$ arch
OpenBSD.i386
The dmesg follows.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Jose
OpenBSD 4.0 (GENERIC.MP) #936: Sat Sep 16 19:27:28 MDT 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/
can i see a dmesg as well? if you're running the machine as an amd64,
can you try it again as an i386?
dlg
On 15/02/2007, at 3:38 AM, Jose Fragoso wrote:
thats very... vague...
Sorry. I agree.
where are you creating this 50G partitiong? in the installer, or in
the installed operating sys
>> thats very... vague...
Sorry. I agree.
>> where are you creating this 50G partitiong? in the installer, or in
>> the installed operating system? what command did you use?
In the installer.
>> how long did it actually take? "a really long time" could be 5
>> seconds if you're expectations are
On 14/02/2007, at 9:59 PM, Jose Fragoso wrote:
Hi,
I just installed OpenBSD 4.0 on an IBM xSeries 336. I have noticed
that, for
some reason,
I/O operations are not carried out as fast as one would expect for
a machine
with SCSI
disks. For instance, the creation of a 50GB partion took a re
Hi,
I just installed OpenBSD 4.0 on an IBM xSeries 336. I have noticed that, for
some reason,
I/O operations are not carried out as fast as one would expect for a machine
with SCSI
disks. For instance, the creation of a 50GB partion took a really long time.
The command
4tar xzvf ports.tar.gz4 took
6 matches
Mail list logo
