Michael Schmidt wrote:
Why may ssh be broken down when jailkit is used?
chrooting ssh is DANGEROUS. it was discussed many times.
search archives.
there is better alternative w/o need to breaking ssh down:
An alternative to jailkit is chrsh
http://www.adg.us/computers/chrsh.html
it also does not require changing any code in ssh,
it is a chroot jail wrapper, invoked by setting user's shell
to the wrapper.
(warning - warning - if you inc
Michael Schmidt wrote:
After having done a bit more researching I have seen that there is a kit
called jailkit, its website is:
http://olivier.sessink.nl/jailkit/
Who on this misc mailing list knows jailkit?
Which experiences did you make with it?
How secure is it?
search in archives for an
Alexey E. Suslikov wrote:
Michael Schmidt wrote:
http://olivier.sessink.nl/jailkit/
Who on this misc mailing list knows jailkit?
Which experiences did you make with it?
How secure is it?
there is better alternative w/o need to breaking ssh down:
Why may ssh be broken down when jailkit is us
Tobias Ulmer wrote:
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 05:35:31PM +0100, Michael Schmidt wrote:
I am looking for both sftp and scp configurations where client users are
forced into chroot jails from where they cannot escape from and cannot
break.
Look at scponly. However, do not enable additional
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 05:35:31PM +0100, Michael Schmidt wrote:
> Hello,
>
> OpenBSD version 3.8
> Architecture i386
>
> After having read several man pages and faqs I have found nothing
> describing sftp jailed by chroot and scp jailed by chroot.
> I am looking for both sftp and scp configurat
Hello,
OpenBSD version 3.8
Architecture i386
After having read several man pages and faqs I have found nothing
describing sftp jailed by chroot and scp jailed by chroot.
I am looking for both sftp and scp configurations where client users are
forced into chroot jails from where they cannot esc
7 matches
Mail list logo
