Re: route add -interface

2009-05-17 Thread Felipe Alfaro Solana
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Claudio Jeker wrote: > On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 11:39:43AM +0200, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote: > > On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Claudio Jeker >wrote: > > > > > On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 01:13:29AM +0200, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote: > > > > Hi misc, > > > > route a

Re: route add -interface

2009-05-17 Thread Felipe Alfaro Solana
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Claudio Jeker wrote: > On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 01:38:07PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2009-05-17, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote: > > > > > > The problem with incorrectly-sourced IP datagrams seems to be NAT: > > > > > > nat on vr2 inet from 172.16.0.1/24 to

Re: route add -interface

2009-05-17 Thread Felipe Alfaro Solana
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2009-05-17, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote: > > > > The problem with incorrectly-sourced IP datagrams seems to be NAT: > > > > nat on vr2 inet from 172.16.0.1/24 to any -> (vr2) round-robin > > > > This rule is created as: > > > > nat on $

Re: route add -interface

2009-05-17 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 11:39:43AM +0200, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote: > On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Claudio Jeker > wrote: > > > On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 01:13:29AM +0200, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote: > > > Hi misc, > > > route add allows one to specify a directly-connected route reachable ove

Re: route add -interface

2009-05-17 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 01:38:07PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2009-05-17, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote: > > > > The problem with incorrectly-sourced IP datagrams seems to be NAT: > > > > nat on vr2 inet from 172.16.0.1/24 to any -> (vr2) round-robin > > > > This rule is created as: > > > >

Re: route add -interface

2009-05-17 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2009-05-17, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote: > > The problem with incorrectly-sourced IP datagrams seems to be NAT: > > nat on vr2 inet from 172.16.0.1/24 to any -> (vr2) round-robin > > This rule is created as: > > nat on $ext_if from $int_if:network to any -> ($ext_if) > > I understand the problem

Re: route add -interface

2009-05-17 Thread Felipe Alfaro Solana
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Felipe Alfaro Solana < felipe.alf...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Claudio Jeker > wrote: > >> On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 01:13:29AM +0200, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote: >> > Hi misc, >> > route add allows one to specify a directly-connected rou

Re: route add -interface

2009-05-17 Thread Felipe Alfaro Solana
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Claudio Jeker wrote: > On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 01:13:29AM +0200, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote: > > Hi misc, > > route add allows one to specify a directly-connected route reachable over > an > > interface, using the -interface switch. However, I can't seem to figure

Re: route add -interface

2009-05-17 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 01:13:29AM +0200, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote: > Hi misc, > route add allows one to specify a directly-connected route reachable over an > interface, using the -interface switch. However, I can't seem to figure out > if it's possible to specify just the interface name to the

route add -interface

2009-05-16 Thread Felipe Alfaro Solana
Hi misc, route add allows one to specify a directly-connected route reachable over an interface, using the -interface switch. However, I can't seem to figure out if it's possible to specify just the interface name to the -interface switch. According to the manual page, only an IP address is allowed