On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 01:49:59AM +0100, Paolo Aglialoro wrote:
> So this means that on sparc64 life would be way easier ;)
> Thanks!
I never tested root-on-softraid on single-stage booting architectures. I
don't have any handy. You'll have to test that yourself!
So this means that on sparc64 life would be way easier ;)
Thanks!
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Josh Grosse wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 12:32:59AM +0100, Paolo Aglialoro wrote:
>
> > running on -current and, similar to the example, having the following
> > disklabel:
> >
> > /boot on bo
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 12:32:59AM +0100, Paolo Aglialoro wrote:
> running on -current and, similar to the example, having the following
> disklabel:
>
> /boot on both sd0a and sd1a
> / on sd2a which is the raid result of sd0d and sd1d
For i386 and amd64, architectures which have a two-stage bo
Just a question:
running on -current and, similar to the example, having the following
disklabel:
/boot on both sd0a and sd1a
/ on sd2a which is the raid result of sd0d and sd1d
would the snapshot upgrade process be consistent through the standard
installer or should one always go to shell, make
On 24.12.2011 P3. 15:42 Q., Ivo Chutkin wrote:
On 24.12.2011 P3. 15:06 Q., Josh Grosse wrote:
On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 02:26:26PM +0200, Ivo Chutkin wrote:
Sorry for hijacking this tread.
Can someone take time to clarify install process on softraid.
I read the article on undeadly.org, preform
On 24.12.2011 P3. 15:06 Q., Josh Grosse wrote:
On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 02:26:26PM +0200, Ivo Chutkin wrote:
Sorry for hijacking this tread.
Can someone take time to clarify install process on softraid.
I read the article on undeadly.org, preform the install on sd2, my
softraid0, copy kernels o
On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 02:26:26PM +0200, Ivo Chutkin wrote:
> Sorry for hijacking this tread.
> Can someone take time to clarify install process on softraid.
> I read the article on undeadly.org, preform the install on sd2, my
> softraid0, copy kernels on sd0a and sd1a, everything went well, and
On 23.12.2011 P3. 08:01 Q., Raymond Lillard wrote:
On 12/22/2011 09:07 PM, Paul B. Henson wrote:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 08:08:08PM -0800, Josh Grosse wrote:
Woops. I misread your post. The commits were September 19, which is
-current, beyond 5.0-release.
You must either migrate to -current,
On 12/22/2011 09:07 PM, Paul B. Henson wrote:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 08:08:08PM -0800, Josh Grosse wrote:
Woops. I misread your post. The commits were September 19, which is
-current, beyond 5.0-release.
You must either migrate to -current, or await 5.1-release.
Ah, ok, thanks for the cla
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 08:08:08PM -0800, Josh Grosse wrote:
> Woops. I misread your post. The commits were September 19, which is
> -current, beyond 5.0-release.
>
> You must either migrate to -current, or await 5.1-release.
Ah, ok, thanks for the clarification. The installboot piece that let
Josh Grosse jggimi.homeip.net> writes:
>
> Paul B. Henson acm.org> writes:
>
> >
> > I've been running openbsd 4.6 for a couple years now with root on
> > softraid, booting off a CF card with a kernel compiled to hardcode
> > root/swap on sd0.
> >
> > I read about official support for root o
Paul B. Henson acm.org> writes:
>
> I've been running openbsd 4.6 for a couple years now with root on
> softraid, booting off a CF card with a kernel compiled to hardcode
> root/swap on sd0.
>
> I read about official support for root on softraid
> Anyway, just to clarify my understanding,
I've been running openbsd 4.6 for a couple years now with root on
softraid, booting off a CF card with a kernel compiled to hardcode
root/swap on sd0.
I read about official support for root on softraid:
http://www.undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20111002154251
and got the impression it would
13 matches
Mail list logo
