Ok,
ktrace showed up that processes having problems to grab a socket. e.g. out of
fds.
Question:
How far can I rise kern.maxfiles having following conditions:
16G RAM total
prefork 16 relayd procs
openfiles-max=65536 in login.conf for relayd class.
Out of my calc it is 16*65536 just to accommod
My intention with this mail is to gather more qualitative help
to, hopefully, ever solve this or to have more info so it can be provided
to someone whom can solve this, if it is a bug.
What I know for sure is that those boxes (dual-node setup) are exposed to a
large HTTP PUT/POST requests.
Large
> >> ktrace gives me following:
> >> 4013 relayd CALL getdtablecount()
> >> 4013 relayd RET getdtablecount 101/0x65
> >> 4013 relayd CALL getrlimit(RLIMIT_NOFILE,0x7f7bb630)
> >> 4013 relayd STRU struct rlimit { cur=3D65536, max=3D65536 }
> >> 4013 relayd RET getrlimit 0
>
Hey,
had to bring this up again as I’m facing the same problem.
Exactly with the same ’error 35’ in trace.
This time it is a 6.0-stable.
Anything else can be done to track this down?
Br
Maxim
> 24 feb. 2016 kl. 10:53 skrev Stuart Henderson :
>
> On 2016-02-24, mxb mailto:m...@alumni.chalmers.se
On 2016-02-24, mxb wrote:
> Hey,
> I have a strange behavior of relayd running on 5.8.
> This machine almost exclusively terminates TLS traffic.
> Exceptions are forwards which are in backup state (listen on CARP).
>
> Some times one or two relayd processes out of many consumes a lot of CPU
> and
Hey,
I have a strange behavior of relayd running on 5.8.
This machine almost exclusively terminates TLS traffic.
Exceptions are forwards which are in backup state (listen on CARP).
Some times one or two relayd processes out of many consumes a lot of CPU
and stays like this until I restart relayd.
6 matches
Mail list logo