On 6/11/05, Graham Gower <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > rdr on $int_if inet proto tcp from $int_net to any port ftp ->
> > > 127.0.0.1 port 8021
> >
> > this works only for packets that *come to* OpenBSD box to be
> > routed, not the packets that are *originated* at the OpenBSD box.
>
> Are you
On 6/11/05, Denis Doroshenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> tell me, why sending a message that doesn't answer the
> question? what is it? is it my poor english or explaining
> skills or is it you, being slacker and not trying to understand
> the question asked?
Maybe if you had stated the question
> On 6/10/05, Jason Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It's very simple, try reading the ftp-proxy man page, as it has an
> > example for exactly what you're doing, something like:
> > rdr on $int_if inet proto tcp from $int_net to any port ftp ->
> > 127.0.0.1 port 8021
>
> this works only f
tell me, why sending a message that doesn't answer the
question? what is it? is it my poor english or explaining
skills or is it you, being slacker and not trying to understand
the question asked?
On 6/10/05, Jason Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's very simple, try reading the ftp-proxy m
It's very simple, try reading the ftp-proxy man page, as it has an
example for exactly what you're doing, something like:
rdr on $int_if inet proto tcp from $int_net to any port ftp ->
127.0.0.1 port 8021
I believe pf.conf man page also has examples for this too. Really,
read the docs, because you
hello,
is there possibility to catch outgoing packets on an interface?
while the question seems dumb, i seem to be stuck and
no man page/PF faq/web searches help me. it seems
that PF rdr-s only incoming packets. is this a correct
statement? is there any thoughts of extending PF
functionality to co
6 matches
Mail list logo
