On Friday 16 June 2006 04:27, Lawrence Horvath wrote:
> > You can rate limit with the altq built into pf.
> Can i rate limit both ways, incomming and outgoing, the pf
> documentation for queues sd only one way, but is there a way to keep
> the system from downloading as much to it? so as to keep u
On 6/15/06, John R. Shannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Lawrence Horvath wrote:
> On 6/15/06, John R. Shannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Lawrence Horvath wrote:
>> > 3.9 GENERIC#617 i386
>> >
>> > Wanted to know what are the possible ways to rate limit an ethernet
>> > interface, if queues in p
Thordur I. Bjornsson wrote:
Lawrence Horvath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu 15.Jun'06 at 13:27:54 -0700
Can i rate limit both ways, incomming and outgoing, the pf
documentation for queues sd only one way, but is there a way to keep
the system from downloading as much to it? so as to keep un
Lawrence Horvath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu 15.Jun'06 at 13:27:54 -0700
> On 6/15/06, John R. Shannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Lawrence Horvath wrote:
> >> 3.9 GENERIC#617 i386
> >>
> >> Wanted to know what are the possible ways to rate limit an ethernet
> >> interface, if queues in pf
On 6/15/06, John R. Shannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Lawrence Horvath wrote:
> 3.9 GENERIC#617 i386
>
> Wanted to know what are the possible ways to rate limit an ethernet
> interface, if queues in pf will do this, or is any other way, i have a
> 2meg colo connection and dont wnat to go over it
3.9 GENERIC#617 i386
Wanted to know what are the possible ways to rate limit an ethernet
interface, if queues in pf will do this, or is any other way, i have a
2meg colo connection and dont wnat to go over it or ill get charged,
and the ISP wont cap it, so i have to cap myself.
Thanks
--
-Lawren
6 matches
Mail list logo
